We hope you are having a great time participating in our Summer Camp activities. (Haven’t heard about Summer Camp ’21 yet? Go check the activities and contest here)
And while you are here, we have some good news to share with you.
On popular demand, we are bringing back BYJU’S Solve the Mystery Case – Season 2!
So quickly grab your Sherlock hat and get ready to solve some of the greatest mysteries of all time.
Ready? Get. Set. Go!
The unsolved mysteries have been solved. Scroll down for the answers.
To all those little Sherlocks who helped us crack these mystery cases, bravo! You did an excellent job. To everyone else who were close to cracking these codes, don’t worry. We’ll be back next year with another set of unsolved mystery cases. In the mean time here is a list of real life famous detectives whom you may already be a fan of.
Stay tuned and keep reading our stories on The Learning Tree page.
Books are Tanaya Goswami’s first love and cheesecakes come a close second. Talking about movies, music, calligraphy, politics, and Elon Musk will get you listed under the friends’ section of her diary. Ever since moving on from her job as an English lecturer, she spends her time at BYJU’S crafting stories filled with emotion and sprinkled with sarcasm. Outside of work, she’s either learning something new (French, most recently!) or is curled up with a book and a cup of coffee. She firmly believes that discovering what you don’t know is the key to knowledge and is constantly working towards improving herself. Drop in a line at storyweavers@byjus.com if you liked her stories, have something nice to say, or if you have compelling ideas to share!
Arya C is a 4th grader who talks about her transition from the US to India and how BYJU`S has helped her at that. She also loves how BYJU`S has made learning a lot more fun.
Meet Sourabh who has a ton to say about his BYJU`S learning experience. His love for quizzes, games and other fun activities are paying off!
V Shriya is a class eight student who has been using BYJU’S for a year now. She shares her experiences with using the app and how it has helped her in improving her academic performance.
Aanvi from class 9 has been with BYJU`S for just 6 months and hear what she has to say about her learning experience with the app.
Comments
Joel John
September 26, 2021
1QA) Under the Eiffel tower because if he sits under it he can only see the bushes and trees.
Urvi sinari
September 18, 2021
Case 2: Raghu because who can write the exam on the first day of school.
Case 3: it was David’s twin brother and Joseph was able to recognise the stranger
Case 5: is the thief had come from outside the house then most of the glass particles would have fallen inside the house where the window is located but they were outside so someone from the inside has broken the window and the small window particles were outside the house.
Priyanka
August 11, 2021
Ans of case 4 – Rishab was lying because he told that he found the will between page no. 113 & 114 of Sidney Sheldon but in this book those page no. are on the opposite sides of the same page so the will cannot be found in between.
Hence proved he is lying.
Ans of case 5 – The policeman was sure that no one from the outside had came because the crack in the window was very small for any human to come inside.
Hence proved no one has come from outside.
Ananya.R
August 6, 2021
1.Far away from the city or in underground
Dhruvika D Singh
August 3, 2021
Case 1 The guilty is Raghu because there are no exam on the first day of any School.
Case 2 It may be someone related to David who may look quite similar to him.
Case 3 The guilty can anyone from the couple because if there would be any thief entering the house most of the window particles would had fallen in the house but it wasn’t like it.
I enjoyed a lot while answering this question……. thanks……I wish ?Season 3 should come very soon………
A great detective
August 2, 2021
That was nice !! . The great detective ?️♀️ is happy ?
Anubhav
July 27, 2021
Case 2 ) Raghu was writing the exam, if he was writing the exam then every student should also write the exam
but nobody do that.
Anubhav
July 27, 2021
Writer must have his lunch from outside the Paris !!
Janani Chandra .P
July 27, 2021
Case2=raghu.the principal suspected Raghu .as it is mentioned first the it was the first day of the school then she lost fees so that means there is no chance that Raghu was writing exam paper it was the first day of school and there is no exam so the principal is suspecting raghu.case4=if the robber enter the house to the window like the directive song there was was supposed to be a lot of shattered glass but there was a tiny piece and the tiny hole so there is no chance of the robber coming through the window.
Sridhar kotyada
July 19, 2021
He was sitting under the Eiffel Tower
Raghu, who writes exams on the first day
He is David’s twin
113 and 114 pages of a book are on two sides of a paper
If it was broken from how come there is little glass inside?
Samanvi
Nachiket patel
July 18, 2021
1. At the exact bottom of the tower
2. Raghu- only he was writing the paper and not others.
4. The pages 114 and 114 are on two opposite of one page.
5. A person could not enter through a window with only few pieces broken.
chama
July 15, 2021
nice
Himika Bhakta
July 14, 2021
I gave the answers but before reading the answer…. ( honest )
Himika Bhakta
July 14, 2021
Case 1 – By the tower restaurant.
Case 2 – Raghu, because how can there be an exam day in the first day of school?
Case 3 – It is J+ O + H + N = JOHN
Case 4 – Rishab could not find the will of the 113th pages and 114th pages of the book
Case 5 – The window glass was on the outside not the inside
Himika Bhakta
July 14, 2021
Case 1 – Underneath the tower
Case 2 – Raghu, because how can there be an exam day in the first day of school?
Case 3 – It is J+ O + H + N = JOHN
Case 4 – Rishab could not find the will of the 113th pages and 114th pages of the book
Case 5 – The window glass was on the outside not the inside
Ratakonda Yashaswi
July 14, 2021
1. He can sit inside the Cafe.
2. Raghu he can’t write test in the first day of school!!!
3. Maybe David’s twin brother so Joseph could easily recognize him~
4. Rishab cannot keep in middle of pg.113 and 114 because they are one page!!!
5. By a small hole a robberer cannot enter the the house.
Diyabinoj
July 13, 2021
1) under the Eiffel Tower
2)Raghu no one writes an exam paper on the first day of school
3)Because David told him about the “stanger” whom he was related to
5)the glaspeices where on wrong side of the winfow
Aditi
July 12, 2021
1st case – because he was eating right in the cafe down to the tower .
2nd case – because we cannot have exam on the first day of the school.
3rd case – because he was his twin .
4th case – don’t know
5th case – don’t know
Swarnendu
July 11, 2021
Tricky case ?️
Rucha Deshpande
July 10, 2021
1) in the restaurant under the ifel tower
2) Raghu as there is no exam on first day of school and if there was exam for Raghu in it would also have been for others
3) he may be David’s twin brother
4) as pages 113 and 114 are back to back and nothing can be kept between them
5)if windows were broken from outside then glasses would have been inside not outside.
Harimurali Muraleedharan
July 4, 2021
Sorry that I didn’t get to know about this but answers are
1. He ate somewhere at the top or bottom of the tower
2. Raghu,he can’t answer an exam at the first day
3. Might be his friends twin?
4. Pages 113 and 114 are on the same page 🙂
5. If the burgler broke in from outside pieces of glass would be more inside.
And thanks for this quest 🙂
Mardav
July 3, 2021
Nice
Oishika Sarkar
June 30, 2021
Answers- Case1. He ate in the restaurant that was located at the base of the tower.
Case2. Raghu, as he can’t write exam papers on the first day of school,can he?
Case3.He was David’s twin hence it was easy for Joseph to recognize the stranger.
Case4. Rishab could not found the will between pages 113 and 114 as he claimed.Try putting a piece of paper between those pages in the book nearest and you will know why.
Case5. If the window was broken by a thief from outside,most of the glass would be on inside not outside……
By Oishika Sarkar
Thank you and please tell the winner ?…..
Hanshikha
June 27, 2021
Ans 1 because he ate in the restaurant that was located at the base of the tower.
Ans 2 Raghu as he can’t write exam papers on the first day of school, can he?
Ans 3 He was David’s twin brother, hence it was easy for Joseph to recognise the strainer.
Ans 4 Rishab couldn’t have found pages 113 and 114 as he claimed.try putting a piece of paper between those pages in the book nearest you and you will know why!
Ans 5 If the window was broken by thief from outside, most of the glass will be found on the inside of the house,not on the outside.
Anand
June 25, 2021
?
Reeva Sachin Gajjar
June 24, 2021
Answer:1-He ate in the restaurant that was located at the
base of the tower.
Answer:2-Raghu, as he cannot write exam papers on the
first day of school, can he?
Answer:3-He was David’s twin brother, hence it was easy
for Joseph to recognise the stranger.
Answer:4-Rishab could not have found the will between
pages 113 and 114 as he claimed. Try putting a
piece of paper between those pages in the book
nearest you and you will know why!
Answer:5-If the window was broken by a thief from outside,
most of the glass will be found on the inside of
the house, not on the outside.
Saniya Deshmukh
June 23, 2021
2.- Raghu is suspected as if exam was being conducted other three could also would have been writing exam
Prajwal Singh
June 23, 2021
Case 1
He ate the in the restaurant which was located at the base of the tower.
Case 2
Raghu was guilty because no school conducts test on the first day of school.
Case 3
He was the twin brother of Joseph’s friend.
Case 4
Pages 113 and 114 will be the opposite sides of the same page. So how can he find it in between those pages.
Case 5
There were very few glass pieces found near the window so, nobody can enter through such a small hole.
Anubha
June 22, 2021
Case 2- he can’t write exam papers at first day of school
Case 5- if thief breaks the window then the glass particle mostly found in inside not outside
Bhumika
June 22, 2021
Thanks Byju’s
Pawani
June 22, 2021
.I think it is becoz Kabir said that he went down half an hour ago….then how could he confidently say that Akash died 15 min ago…
2 I think so Raghu
3.John
5.Becoz if someone broked the window there must be more pieces of window…but I think the husband and his wife only broked the window …so only tiny pieces
P.Mariya Nithiya
June 22, 2021
Case 2:Answer is Raghu.
Case 3:I think that they were twins.
Aditi
June 22, 2021
1 case:He was eating below the Eiffel tower.
2 case:Raghu was lying as it was the first day of school . How could he write the exam on first day?
3 case:he was David’s twin brother
5 case:Because the broken pieces should be inside house but it was outside the home
M . Subham Das
June 22, 2021
Case 1 – The writer taken the lunch under Eiffel tower .
Case 2 – The principal should suspect Raghu because there is no exam on the first day of school .
Case 3 – With the help of Codeward .
Case 4 – Rishab couldn’t have found the will between pages 113 and 114 as he claimed. Try putting a piece of paper between those pages in the book nearest you and you will know why .
Case 5 – If the window was broken by a thief from outside, most of the glass will be found on the inside of the house, not on the outside .
Rishu Raj
June 21, 2021
I am the student of class 7
Vidushi Singh
June 21, 2021
Case 1- at the restaurant
Case 2-Raghu because there is no exam at the first day of school.
Case 3-he was one of his friends friend. That’s the maybe reason Joseph recognized him.
Case 4-because the pages 113 and 114 are in the same page. Therefore Rishab cannot find the will in the pages between 113 and 114.
Case 5-if the theif would have come through the window then the small pieces of window glass will be more inside the house not outside the house.
Vaibhav shinde
June 21, 2021
Good
Krithi
June 20, 2021
1. Anywhere but Paris/ Facing away from the Eiffel tower
2. Raghu because there couldn’t have been an exam on the first day of school
5. If the robber had broken the window from outside, the glass pieces must’ve fallen inside
Darshil
June 20, 2021
Case 1: On opposite side of Eiffel tower
Case 2: Raghu
Case 3: Because the stranger was David’s twin brother.
Case 4: pg. 113 and 114vare single page
Case 5: Police man was sure after seeing the pieces of glass scattered outside.
Darshil
June 20, 2021
Case 1: On opposite side of Eiffel tower
Case 2: Raghu
Case 3: Because the stranger was David’s twin brother.??
Case 4: pg. 113 and 114vare single page??
Case 5: Police man was sure after seeing the pieces of glass scattered outside.?
Khushal mhatre
June 20, 2021
Thanks for it
Syna Chatterjee
June 20, 2021
In case5 the policeman was sure that the burglar couldn’t steal as it was impossible for him to enter through such a small break in window
abhi don
June 20, 2021
Raghu is guilty another reason is that
– all the students are not giving exam and how only raghu is giving exam
Syna Chatterjee
June 20, 2021
I think Raghu as it was the first day of school anh how can an exam occur on the first day of school? So it is RAGHU
Tanmayee
June 19, 2021
Case 1 …. Under or below the Eiffel tower
Case 2 …. Tina .Because if she lost her tuition fee she should complain in tuition
Case 4 …. If the nephew had seen on April 11 how can he complain or report on April 10th
Sreeja Sardar
June 19, 2021
1 . In my opinion he had lunch outside the city or he might promised to not see the tower while taking lunch
2 . The teacher have suspected Raghu and Debby as that was the first day of school and Raghu was writing exam paper . The school should close at a particular time ,Debby cannot enter the school late .
3. The stranger was David’s brother so he looked similar to David . So Joseph understood who he was .
4. Nobody would keep an important paper like a will in between pages of a book . Secondly no person must not give his property to his nephew by discrimating his sons . Thirdly why Rishab was going through the particular book Sidney Sheldon . Last but not the least why Rishab did not informed his cousins and uncle about the will which he had got a week ago before his uncle’s dismissal.
5. The policeman told so because no thief will enter the house by breaking a small part of the window as there were ony few pieces of glass outside the house .
Aparna Singh
June 19, 2021
Case 2 raghu
Vishal Gupta
June 18, 2021
He was David’s twin brother, hence it was easy for Joseph to recognise stranger
Vishal Gupta
June 18, 2021
He ate in the restaurant that was located at the base of the tower
Vishal Gupta
June 18, 2021
Case 2- principal suspect Raghu as on the first day of school how he can not write exam papers
Harshini
June 18, 2021
Case 2- who writes exam papers on the first day of school
Ansh Shah
June 18, 2021
Ans 1 on the top of iffel tower
V.Kushal
June 18, 2021
1) The detective thought that this was not a suicide , we know that cyanide kills them instantly but the detective told to arrest Kabir because he have brought the bottle to the room and Kabir also knew that he died 15 minutes ago , this means he only killed aakash.
2) I think Raghu is the suspect because there was no exams in the class so what he was doing? He only stole the money
3) I think Julien killed the widow as the the dates of the months are the starting dates of that month , I think the widow dint gave the housemaid the money in these months
4) The inspector said because , it was may be a bad will or the will was written by Rishabh only
5) Because if any outsider would have broken the window then the pieces inside the house and not outside the house
Darshana
June 18, 2021
1. He would have ate his lunch at a restaurant.
2. Rahul. Because it was the first day of school so how could he write exam.
3. He is David twin brother.so he recognised the stranger.
Madhusri?
June 18, 2021
Very nice ?
Divisha
June 17, 2021
Case 1) He ate his lunch at the top of Eiffel Tower.
Case 2) Raghu because it was the first day of school and there are no exams on the day.
Case 3) The stranger is Joseph’s twin brother.
Case 4) Rishabh could not have found the will in between pages 113 and 114 as it is the same page.
Case 5) As, if the window was broken by a burglar, he/she will break it from outside. And there were no shards of glass inside the house.
Akankshya p. Swain
June 17, 2021
1-The poet may be eating in restaurant near the Eiffel tower.
2-It was the first day of the school so how can Raghu write his exam .
3-He may be the twin brother of David or else how can he talk to any stranger.
4-Rishab may found the will in page number 113 and 114 because they are joint.
5-The their may trying to broke the window from outside as the prices were found inside .
Namami Chourey
June 17, 2021
The french artist had lunch beneath the eiffel tower from where it was not visible
Ahad Muhammad s
June 17, 2021
Case 1 – top of the Eiffel tower
Case-2- principal suspect’s Raghu because there was no exam that day
Case 3- Because the stranger was David’s brother
Case 4- the will was Dhivhars
Case 5- Because no human being can enter through a tiny piece of broken window
divyanshi manda
June 17, 2021
case 5 policeman is so sure because the glass broke and make small hole and the human doesn’t go inside
The house from small hole
Ann Maria Martin
June 17, 2021
2. Raghu
divyanshi manda
June 17, 2021
case 4 inspector say this because inspector hide the file of will
Pragya Gupta
June 17, 2021
The answer of Case 5 = The policeman is sure because there are only few inty pieces of glass is inside of the house and the rest of the pieces is outside of house
Pragya Gupta
June 17, 2021
The answer of Case 2 is Raghu because this is the first day of school and he said that he is writing exam
divyanshi manda
June 17, 2021
case 3 David;friend knew that the Joseph talks like this
Priyansh verma
June 17, 2021
Very nice
Sheryl Rajesh
June 17, 2021
1.The Poet was sitting on the Eiffel tower.
2.Raghu because it was the first day of school how could he write the exam.
3.It was his twin brother.
4.Page no 113 and 114 are both the same page they can never be seprate.
5.If someone enters from outside the glass the scatter outside.
divyanshi manda
June 17, 2021
case2 the principal suspected Debby
Divyanshi
June 17, 2021
case1 from the top of the eiffel tower
PALLE AVISHI REDDY
June 17, 2021
Case 1= At any other country
Case 2= Raghu
Case 3= Joseph was briefed about the stranger by David so….
Case 4=’Cause Sidney Sheldon’s book doesn’t usually lie in the collection of Mr. Bhosle
Case 5= The husband claimed that the burglar broke the window which was outside the house, whereas the Policeman found the glass pieces inside the house, which points that the husband was lying.
Sudarsan
June 17, 2021
Detective
Pihu Tiwari
June 17, 2021
nice!
Sreedev KP
June 17, 2021
Where is the answers of this
Sukanya
June 17, 2021
Where are the answers?????????
Aaryan
June 17, 2021
Byju’s can you plz send the answers. I am eagerly waiting for them
Atif malika mujawar
June 17, 2021
Case 5-because the hole in the window was small to a burglar or an outsider to enter .
Atif malika mujawar
June 17, 2021
Case 2 ans-raghu
Sudiksha Podder
June 17, 2021
2. Raghu
Greeshma GS
June 17, 2021
Are you husband’s expected by principal because he is writing exam is everyone will be writing exam so you tell lie.
Aditi Hitendra Joshi
June 17, 2021
3.From its behaviours
2.Raghu
ARNAV KUMAR SAHOO
June 17, 2021
Case 1: He might be standing on the top of the tower.
Case 2 : Raghu will be suspect because on the first of the of school their is no exam .
Chaturya
June 17, 2021
Case:1- The writer had his lunch inside the Eiffel tower. As he could not see it if his was inside it.
Case:2- The principal would have suspected Raghu as at 8:00 am there was assembly and no exam was conducted. And in the case of others Ron was chatting with his friends , Arushi was reading news in the morning assembly and Debby was running late and reached school at only 8:10 am . So raghu was the one who stole Tina’s tuition fee.
Case:3- It must have been David itself as the description of the person was not mentioned neither he was famous nor he was related to Joseph. Maybe David decided to surprise Joseph.
Case:4- The inspector would have probably said to keep it back because he was not sure about trusting Mr. Bhosle’s nephew because if Mr. Bosley really had written the will he would have not kept in a book .
Case:5- The police man was so sure that no outsider had entered the couple’s house because the bulgar would have breaker the window if he wanted to come inside . Probably a ball had came and hit the window while some was playing .
Manas Bhange
June 17, 2021
waiting for answer !
Nilanjana Hota
June 17, 2021
1) In the Eiffel Tower
2) Raghu. Because he couldn’t appear any exam when his classmates are not
3) He may be calling Joseph’s name to find him
4) –
5) The presence of glass pieces outside of the house instead of inside.
Gunjan Shirbhate
June 17, 2021
when will i get the answers
Mayuri Laxman Dhanak
June 17, 2021
Raghu is the one who theft Tina’s tution fee. As it was the first day of school and how could one write exam on first day of school? Therefore Raghu stole Tina’s tution fee.
Sarah
June 16, 2021
Case -1 He had his lunch in the Eiffel Tower .
Case -2 Raghu .
Case – 3 It’s his twin brother .
Case – 4 The inspector said that since page 113 and 114 are a back and front page , he couldn’t have found it in the middle of it .
Case – 5 No one can break into a house with that a small crack . If they had there would be more pieces of glass around the broken window and it would be a bigger crack .
Am I right in any of them ?
Sagnik Ghosh
June 16, 2021
Good
Saksham Raj Singh
June 16, 2021
1. At the base of Eiffel Tower.
2. Raghu because there can’t be an exam in the first day of the school. (But why will and carry tution fees at
tee first day though?)
3. He was a twin brother of David.
4. This is because it will add more delay, expense and conflict.
5. Because if the burglar had entered the house glasses will be outside of the house is not inside of the house.
adidev c s
June 16, 2021
case 5.no one could enter a house with so small hole.we can assume that by the number of broken glass pieces.also if anyone entered,there will be atleast some drop of blood
Samit Tendulkar
June 16, 2021
1) He must be eating his lunch in the eigeel tower restaurant.
2) Raghu, on first day of school no one gives exams
3) David was with Joseph when he met stranger
4) The will produced was older to the latest will of April 20
5) if robber had come from outside window glasses would have not fallen outside the house.
Vanshika Goyal
June 16, 2021
Ques 1 . The writer is having lunch under the tower where there is a slanting semi circle or near the tower
Ques 2. The teacher will accept Debby statement as he said that he was going to be late and he was trying to come as fast as hi can
Ques 3. May be he was his a school times friend whom he forgotten or may be the boy he meets was a stranger or a hacker
Ques 4.beacuse my be the inspector not doen that thing and caught him lying and said him that please keep it back from where you bring
Ques 5. Beacuse if the theif come he could break full window so that he will be able to go properly but the window is broken very less in small pieces
Ramsha siddiqui
June 16, 2021
Governing, I am Ramsha Siddiqui I have taken the course of byjus till 5 to 10 so can you please tell me how to join summer camp 21 I want to join summer camp
Advaith
June 16, 2021
Waiting for the mysteries to be solved!!! It’s 16th today… I CANNOT WAIT FOR THE ANSWERS ANYMORE!!!!
Vibhavaree Sinha
June 16, 2021
I tried and could easily solve 1, 2, 3and 4
ans 1- he was sitting on the top of the eiffle tower.
ans2 -raghu said he was writing the exam but its mentioned that it was the first day of school.
ans 3 – he was david’s twin
ans 4 – sidney sheldon is an author not a book.
I am not too sure about the 5 one but, if the window is broken from outside the glass pieces should be inside.
Adi Harshith Naidu Lanka
June 16, 2021
Case 1: He might have had eaten lunch outside of the Paris city.
Case 2 : Raghu was suspected because he was not writing an exam at the assembly time.
Case 3 : When David told Joseph, the stranger told to Joseph that David told about Joseph and that’s how Joseph understood that he is friend of David.
Case 4:Sidney Sheldon is not a book but a famous writer, Hence he was lying.
Case 5 : The policeman was so sure because the thief cannot enter through a small broken hole which was formed in the window, that’s how the policeman was so sure about that.
Sakshi
June 16, 2021
Case 1
Inside the house with windows closed.
Case 2
Raghu: how can a school conduct exams on first day ?
Aditi Shrivastav
June 16, 2021
1. He would have taken lunch inside his home with keeping the windows and curtains closed.
2. The Principal would have suspected Raghu because he was writing exam paper and according to my information there was no exam at that time.
3. Because it is possible that they would have decided the venue and time where to meet.
4. Because the will would be stolen also and it would be better if he would left it there.
5. The poilceman made it sure because there were only a little pieces of windows cracked from between and no one could enter from such a little space. It’s logical.
Srijoni Dutta
June 16, 2021
Case 1: Somewhere in base of the Eiffel tower.
Case 2: Ron because how can he chat inside school
Case 4: He is lying because it’s impossible to be in between page numbers 113 and 114
Case 5: Because through that tiny space in window no burglar can pass
Aminta Binu
June 16, 2021
1. He ate by showing his back to the Eiffel tower.
2. Raghu was the suspect because who writes an exam on the first day of school?
3. Maybe he was twin of David
4. Pages 113 & 114 can’t be kept open at the same time.
5. If the robber broke the glass window from outside, there should be more pieces of broken glass inside. If the broken pieces are only little that means someone from inside did it.
Sehajleen Kaur
June 16, 2021
Case 1 he ate his each lunch at the top of the tower that’s why Eiffel tower is not visible to him
Ahana Mitra
June 16, 2021
The writer was having the lunch in the room, closing the doors
Parth
June 16, 2021
1 caseOutside the city, 3case stranger,5case because the crack in the window was small
Bikramjit Singh
June 16, 2021
Answer of Case 1. The writer will have his lunch at the first floor of the tower.
Answer of Case 2. It’s Raghu , as it was the first day of school . So, no test will be there .
Answer of Case 3. The stranger was the twin brother of one of Joseph’s friends.
Answer of Case 4. Inspector Diwakar said this because he is one of the sons of Mr.Bhosle.
Answer of Case 5. When a window is broken from the outside by a thief, most of the glass will be found on the i
inside of the house, not on the outside of the house.
divya
June 16, 2021
Very nice questions
Kinjal Mukesh Gupta
June 16, 2021
Case 1. Writer Lunch in the Eiffel Tower
Case 2. Raghu because on the first day of school there was not a exam
Case 3. David & Joseph are friends
Case 4. Rishab is telling lie because Diwakar had said on April 20
Case 5. Burglar is the enemy of that couple
Janhvi
June 16, 2021
Answer to of case 1
He sat on the top of the Eiffel tower
Ranon
June 16, 2021
Case 1: he had his breakfast on top of the Eiffel tower
Case 2: It was Raghu. Exams aren’t conducted on the first day to school
Case 3: he was his friends(david) twin?
Case 5: if a burglar had broken into the house the glass pieces will fall inside the house as the burglar had entered from the outside but here the glass pieces were outside the house meaning the glass was broken from the inside
Arundhati das
June 16, 2021
1st he was eating lunch on the top the Eiffel tower
2nd Raghu had the tution fees
3rd David,s twin brother
4th he was telling a lie about the will
5th because the glass was broken inside out
Bhavana S Fattepur
June 16, 2021
I love BYJU’s a lot
Bhavana S Fattepur
June 16, 2021
I love BYJU’s
Hetansh Mehta
June 16, 2021
Answer 1 – He ate his lunch on the top of the eiffel tower only.
Answer 2- Raghu as No one takes exams on the first day of school.
Answer 3- He was a twin brother of his friend David.
Answer 4 – He said so because it is not mentioned that the author is dead
Answer 5 – Inspector was sure because if a burglar had broke in than glass would have shattered inside the house.
Niyati
June 16, 2021
Byjus team i have not received the correct answers till now. Pls send them
Chitralekha Killi
June 16, 2021
Case 1 – Guy De Maupassant sat in the base of the Eiffel tower to eat lunch
Case 2 – Raghu is the suspect as he told that he was writing exam when the assembly was going on
Case 3 – Joseph had a photo of the stranger
Case 4 – Page no.s 113 and 114 are the same sheet
Case 5 – The person broke the glass from inside because there were very few pieces of glass inside the room
Nathan
June 16, 2021
>> Watch this space on June 15 for answers
Waiting for answers.
Suryansh Verma
June 16, 2021
In case 2 answer is Raghu have the money of Tina
Punya jain
June 16, 2021
My answers-
Case 1 – the writer had his lunch in the Eiffel tower itself
Case 2 – Raghu because Ron could have chatted I the assembly with his friends and arushi was reading the news in morning and debby reached late..if they were in same class then how could only Raghu be writing the exam and not others.
Case 3 – He was a twin brother of David
Case 4 – because Rishab’s father was a writer so that paper might be a part of his new publishing.
Case 5 – When a window is broken from the outside by a thief, most of the glass will be found on the inside of the house, but only few pieces were scattered
Thanks byjus for these brainstorming mysteries
Punya jain
June 16, 2021
Case 1 – the writer had his lunch in the Eiffel tower itself
Case 2 – Raghu because Ron could have chatted I the assembly with his friends and arushi was reading the news in morning and debby reached late..if they were in same class then how could only Raghu be writing the exam and not others.
Case 3 – He was a twin brother of David
Case 4 – because Rishab’s father was a writer so that paper might be a part of his new publishing.
Case 5 – When a window is broken from the outside by a thief, most of the glass will be found on the inside of the house, but only few pieces were scattered
Sukanya
June 16, 2021
Amazing cases
Ashwin Sinha
June 16, 2021
Case I :- The writer probably had his lunch on the top of the Eiffel Tower so that the Eiffel Tower is not visible to him.
Case II :- Raghu is the one who stole the tution fees and whom the Principal suspected because it was the first day of the school and on the first day how could a student write his exams.
Case III :- The reason behind Joseph knowing him was his friend David might have told his name and not his appearance.
Case IV :- It might have been a page of the book Sidney Sheldon where the will might have been the part of the book’s story.
Case V :- If any person or burglary or some other outsider would want to enter the house then by breaking the windows would have made a loud sound .
SAMRIDDHI BANERJEE
June 16, 2021
ANSWER OF CASE 2 IS RAGHU
SAMRIDDHI BANERJEE
June 16, 2021
ANSWER OF CASE 1 IS PARACHUTE
arpita
June 16, 2021
from where to get the answers
swastik das
June 16, 2021
Where are the answers of case study
MANVITHA
June 16, 2021
1. On the top of the Eiffel tower. B’cause if he sat on the top of the tower he wouldn’t look down b’cause of its height.
2. It is Raghu. It was the first day of school and they did not learn anything how would he write the exam paper.
I can solve only two??
MANVITHA
June 16, 2021
1. On the top of the Eiffel tower. B’cause if he sat on the top of the tower he wouldn’t look down b’cause of its height.
2. It is Raghu. It was the first day of school and they did not learn anything how would he write the exam paper.
I can solve only two??
Amogh
June 16, 2021
Case 1 – Top of the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2 – Raghu, Because it was the first day of the school nobody will be having exam at the first day at the school.
Case 3 – because he called or met his friend David and asked about it.
Case 5 – Because he noticed that there was only a few glass particles near the window
Shlok
June 16, 2021
[1] Top of the Eiffel Tower
[2] Raghu
[3] He heard about him
[4] There was no such book
[5] Broken window glasses outside of the house
Subhrajyoti Mallick
June 16, 2021
Case 1 – The writer ate his lunch at the base of Eifel tower
Ayushi Gupta
June 16, 2021
case 2:-
The principal suspected Raghu
Kartavya Singh
June 16, 2021
I will try to solve them all
Gauri Pandey
June 16, 2021
CASE 3) The moment Joseph met the stranger he understood who he was because when we meet someone we introduce ourselves and the stranger also did the same !
Hence , Joseph understood that who he was .
Rakshitha G
June 16, 2021
2. Debby
Rakshitha G
June 16, 2021
1. Under the Eiffel Tower
Gauri Pandey
June 16, 2021
CASE 2) Principal suspected Raghu because it was morning time and except Raghu everyone are busy in morning assembly , chatting and one of them got late to school !
So , how can raghu write exam paper in the morning assembly ?
????
AVNI
June 16, 2021
1. He sat under the Eiffel tower
2. Raghu because no one can have an exam on the first day of school
3. IDK
4. It was a will from the book itself
5. The glass broken was very small
Tushara
June 16, 2021
Answer s please
Tanvi Rajendra Meshram
June 16, 2021
Ans 4 As risabh said that he saw the will between the page no. 113 and 114 of a book .As both the page will be on a same page,so no one can put will between them.that’s why inspector ask rishabh to put the will back between the page.
Soham deshpande
June 16, 2021
Case1 – on the Eiffel tower itself
Case2 – Raghu, because how he can write exam on first day of school
Case3 -David might have told the stranger that how Joseph looked
Case4 – risabh confirmed the date on which the will was written or the ink how old it was might be another reason
Case5- no human can go through from such a tiny hole
Shreyansh Srivastava
June 16, 2021
1) He was sitting under the tower.
2) Principal would suspect Raghu as there is no exam at the first day of school.
3) His friend David was also with him, so David helped joseph to identify.
5) Policemen was sure because no human can enter through a small hole.
All the riddles were interesting, I enjoyed a lot!!!!!!! Thanks #Byju’s.
I couldn’t’ solve the 4th riddle, so please answer that!
Shreyansh
Sreedev KP
June 16, 2021
Where is the answers?
Jagadeesh kaliyamoorthi
June 16, 2021
1. He will be eating under the Eiffel Tower.
2. Raghu is the the one who stole her money.
3. He was Joseph’s boss.
4. Page 113 and 114 are on the same
sheet so he cannot find them in between these pages
5. If the glass was broken from the outside then the glass pieces should have fallen inside the house, but there where no glass pieces inside the house. So the police confirmed it wasn’t a Robbery.
5.
Aastha Rai
June 16, 2021
When will the resuls come?
Tanvi Rajendra Meshram
June 16, 2021
Ans 3 because he was a stranger
Tanvi Rajendra Meshram
June 16, 2021
Ans:2 Principal will suspend Raghu because it was first day of school and he was telling the principal that he was writing exam.
PRADYUMNA ROY CHOUDHURY
June 16, 2021
Case 1-Writer had his lunch at the foot of the Eiffel Tower
Case 2-Debby, because he was the only child who mentioned the time, had he/she not known the incident how can he/she know about the time?
Case 3-Either Joseph was carrying an ID inscribing his name or during introduction he must have mentioned his name
Case 4-Will which is the last one is valid. Since the earlier Will made 10 days ago is invalid he said so.
Case 5-It is impossible to take entry into the house from outside within such a small hole made in the glass window, so the Policeman said this.
Tanvi Rajendra Meshram
June 16, 2021
Ans: 1 In Effil tower
Shriram g gouda
June 16, 2021
1. In height of the 81 storey building in Mississauga , so Eiffel tower in Paris cannot see from there,so French writer can go to there
2.Raghu,because in that time who also not writing the exam paper
3.He was a tiwn brother of one of Joseph’s friend
4.Because the in Mr.bhosle collection was not SidneySheldon he was American writter and in between pages 113 and 114 there not be a letter and inspector now he is telling lies to him,so he say that
5. From that tiny broken window glasses burglar not come inside,so for inspector that made sure
UDAY
June 16, 2021
1.IN FRENCH
2.RAGHU TAKEN THE TINA TUTION FEE.RAGHU TELLED I WAS WRITING EXAM PAPER . IN 8 AM NOT CONDUCT THE EXAM.
3.HE WAS DAVID
4.
5.THE POLICE MAN NOTICED WINDOW WAS BROKEN VERY SMALL . IN THAT HOLE BURGLUR WAS NOT ENTER TO THE ROOM
v.charvi
June 16, 2021
1
Aadrika Singh
June 16, 2021
1- He ate lunch everyday at the base of the Eiffel Tower.
2- Raghu
3- He was a twin brother of one of Joseph’s friend.
4- Because pg.113 and pg.114 never come together.
5- When a window is broken from outside by a theif, most of the glass will be found inside of the house, not outside of the house.
Nandini Ray
June 16, 2021
When will result come…….. I just can’t wait
Aditya
June 16, 2021
Raghu case no.3
Harshita
June 16, 2021
Case 5 – if the window was broken from outside then the pieces of the glass were found inside the house.
Shaalmali Kulkarni
June 16, 2021
1) On an air balloon
2) Raghu
3) It was David’s twin brother
4) It was a bookmark
5) Because it was made by children while playing
Tripti Sharma
June 16, 2021
1.
2. Raghu
3. I felt the stranger told his name to him
4. Because the policeman knew that Rishab was lying.
5. Because only a few particles of glass founded by the policeman so no outsider could enter the house because as a few particles of glass are broken so the hole was also so small so no outsider can inter the house from the window.
Aranya Samanta
June 15, 2021
The answer of second question is the principal suspect Ron because Ron was in school and mobiles are not allowed so how Ron will chat with his friends but I think the answer can be also Raghu because on the first day of school why there will be any exams if then why Tina have not given the exam.????????
Rudra
June 15, 2021
Yes
Sai Santosh Ingle
June 15, 2021
1.below the Eiffel tower
2.Raghu,As he can’t give exams on the first day of the school
3.?
4.The paper cannot be between pages 113 and 114
5.Because if the window is broken from outside then most broken glasses will be inside. But what was seen by policeman is exactly opposite.
shruti pappu
June 15, 2021
i think that the writer sat in the effile tower so that he couldn’t see the it
Anuj Shankar Tewary
June 15, 2021
Case 1: because he ate under the tower
Case 2: Raghu is the suspect because at 8 am they had assembly not exams
Case 3: Maybe because David told Joseph where he was
Case 4: _
Case 5: it was broken from the inside as there were small pieces of glass inside
Srijani Mukherjee
June 15, 2021
Case 1:Had his lunch below the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2:Raghu;No one writes a exam paper at the time when the school just starts.
Case 3:By his name.
Case 4: Page 113 and 114 never form two opposite pages in a book.
Case 5: the pieces of glass were shattered close to the window .If broken then it would scattered to a distance atleast.
sachin
June 15, 2021
nice
Debojani Mishra
June 15, 2021
1.the writer would have his lunch under the Eiffel tower.
2.The principle suspected Raghu because Raghu said that “he was writing an exam paper “but it was the first day of school and on the first day of the school exam is not there.
3. Because David had shown the picture of the stranger to Joseph before…
4.the inspector said this because Rishabh said that”he found the paper between the pages 113 and 114 “and 113 and 114 are consecutive numbers and there are no numbers between 113 and 114 ….so Rishabh was lying…
5. The policeman was so sure because if the bulglar or any outsider would come after breaking the window then the glasses of the window would fall inside the house but the glasses were outside the house … That means no one has come from outside the house …
Srijani Mukherjee
June 15, 2021
Case 1:Had his lunch below the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2:Raghu;No one writes a exam paper at the when the school just starts.
Case 3:By his name.
Case 4: Page 113 and 114 never form two opposite pages in a book.
Case 5 :If the burglar had entered the house through the window the pieces of glass would be outside the house not inside it ,since he broke it from the outside.
Yuit Kalpesh Shah
June 15, 2021
1) The writer ate the lunch outside the city
2) The principal suspected Raghu as it was the first day how could he be writing exam paper
3) The stranger must have told him who he is when Joseph saw him
4)
5) The police officer told no robbery has happened because if the burglar had come in by breaking the window the pices of glass would be inside the house.
Tejal Vijay
June 15, 2021
Case 1-Just below the tower.
Case 2-Ron because they were all new and couldn’t make friends so fast.
Case 3-Joseph was wearing same shoes as the stranger’s so he understood that it was David’s known(stranger) as Joseph might have gifted David those shoes which David gave to the stranger.
Case 4-Page number 113 and 114 can never come together. They will be like back and forth pages.
Case 5-If the burglar entered through the window the window must have damaged completely and a lot of pieces might have been there as when window was broken from outside all the broken glass pieces must have fallen inside the house.
Sharanya
June 15, 2021
1.writer should have lunch at effiel tower since the tower is not visible from that point
3. The moment Joseph met him he understood that he was the person he was looking fpr because another person was too looking for someone
4. The inspector said so because it is not possible to have in between 113 and 114
Ayushi Dhar Chowdhury
June 15, 2021
1: The writer ate his lunch right below the Eiffel Tower.
2: It was Raghu, because when assembly is going on, he cannot write an exam.
3: Because it was David’s twin brother.
4: This could never happen that the revised version of the will (written on 20th April), is written on 10th April. So, the inspector understood that he was telling lie.
5: If the number of pieces of broken glasses are more on the outside than inside, then the window must have been broken from inside to outside.
Soumili Layek
June 15, 2021
1. The writer had his lunch in a restaurant under the Eiffel tower.
2. Raghu. Because no exam is held on the first day of school
3. The stranger must have been a twin of Joseph’s friend David.
4.
5. The policeman said so because it was not possible for a person to come in through such a small hole on the window. It must have done by someone inside the house and they broke the window so that they wouldn’t be the suspect.
Aditya Thakur
June 15, 2021
1. On the top of Eiffel tower
2. Raghu because it was the first day of school and he was writing exam paper
5. When burglar entered from outside than more pieces of glass scattered inside the house
Ramanunni C
June 15, 2021
1 : For Guy de Maupassant not to view the Eiffel Tower, he must have been on The Eiffel Tower.
2 : Raghu is the culprit here, as it was the first day of school, there wouldn’t have been any exam.
3 : Possibility 1 – David must have showed Joseph a picture of
the person/stranger.
Possibility 2 – The person must have been a twin brother of
David whom Joseph knew about, but he never met,
otherwise he wouldn’t recognise the person/stranger at
once.
4 : In a book, pages 113 and 114 would’ve been on either side
of one single page, so he could have never found the will in
‘between’ those pages.
5 : Because the window was broken from the inside. If the
window was broken from outside, there would have been
more glass shards would have been present in the inside
of the house, but instead the glass shards were outside.
So it was probably broken from the inside of the house.
Zenisha Laskar
June 15, 2021
Case – 1= Under the Tower.
Case – 1= Raghu. Because at first day how he was writing exam paper.
Case – 3=Talk with the man.
Case – 4=If Rishab was correct, he put the will on the correct described place.
Case – 5=Because, the size of the broken part of the window was very small. A person can’t entered into the broken part of the window.
Sreedev KP
June 15, 2021
Where is the answers
Nandita Kharche
June 15, 2021
Case 1: the writer had lunch under the Eiffel tower
Case 2: Raghu
Case 3: the stranger was David’s twin brother.
Case 4: page no. 113 and 114 lie on the same paper sides
Case 5: the can’t enter through a tiny hole in the window.
Advaith A.J.
June 15, 2021
Answer of case 1: May be he is sitting in inside his room on
his house
Case 2: Raghu because there is no exam in 1st day of school.
?
Case 3: I think they were met by saying there name or any
code
Case 4: Rishab said lie because page number 113 and 114 is
on the same sheet there is no pages between it
Case 5: If the window was broken from outside Major pieces
of broken glass would be in inside the house ? but it
is on outside in this case…
Hari Prasanna G
June 15, 2021
Case 1
Ans. Under the Eiffel tower.
Case 2
Ans. Raghu stole Tina tuition fee.
Case 3
Ans. He was a thief.
Case 4
Ans.
Case 5
Ans. The police man was sure because no one could fit through the broken area in the window.
Harazeez
June 15, 2021
1) he never lived in Paris as France has other places as well?
2) Raghu as on the first day to school there cannot be any exam?
3) he came to know that he was a stranger!!?
4) his nephew was lying as 113 and 114 are two sides of the same page…. So can’t keep a page in be?
5) only a few pieces were inside but others were outside… Which cannot be possible as if someone entered from outside the pieces should all have been inside the house!!?
Avanthika Hareesh
June 15, 2021
Case 1 – Guy de Maupassant ate his lunch in the Eiffel Tower restaurant, the only place in Paris where it wasn’t visible.
Case 2 – The principal suspected Raghu as he said that he was writing an exam paper. No school conducts an exam on the very first day.
Case 3 – The stranger was David’s twin brother.
Case 4 – Rishab came up with a new will on 18th of April and said that his uncle revised his will on April 10th. But the date of original will was April 20.
Case 5 – When a window is broken from the outside most glass pieces will fall inside the house. But the husband showed the policeman broken window glasses on the outside of the house.
Manvir Singh
June 15, 2021
I only the ans foR one he could have eaten lunch at the base or underground or in a closed room
Aathithyan Manoharan
June 15, 2021
Case 2 :
The principal suspects Raghu, because he said that iam writing exam paper but innthe 1st day of the school how will he writes exam papers?? So Raghu is the person who stoled the tutiuon fee .
Meenakshi Joshi
June 15, 2021
Answer no.1 The writer will have its lunch at the 81-storey building.
Answer no.2 The principal will suspect Raghav because there was no exam that day.
Answer no.3 Because David told about the stranger to Joesoph.
Answer no.4 Because his uncle has left one more live for them or their life story belongs to the story of Sidney Sheldon.
Answer no.5 the police man made sure because it was a very tiny holes so anyone can’t reach inside the house from the little crack.
Niveditha Chowdary
June 15, 2021
Case 1 – I think the writer is sitting on the top of the eiffel tower . So that the writer can’t see the Eiffel tower.
Akilesh
June 15, 2021
1.
2.ron because at the time of 8 am all are assemble at the school.
Mohit Srivastav
June 15, 2021
Than you
Rudransh Sekhar
June 15, 2021
1.Below the Eiffel tower
2.according to me it was Raghu who stole Tina’s fees because as Arushi said she was reading newspaper in the morning assembly so how Raghu wrote the exam paper
3. Joseph would have understood who he was because it can be that he met him before.
4.Diwakar questioned Rishab because he can be lying
Vijit
June 15, 2021
Case 1 : he had his lunch from towers top.
Archisha Nayak
June 15, 2021
1) That lich place might be an underground restaurant.
2) Raghu as because everybody should be writing exampaper with him.
3) He might be his twin brother.
Priya tepan
June 15, 2021
Case 5 The policeman was so sured because he noticed that only few tiny pieces of the glass were scattered
so no outsider can entered in the house and if anyone can entered so the window had to be more pieces of the glass were scattered about near broken window area . But not more pieces . So robbery is done by anyone from inside the house.
Mohit Kumar Maurya
June 15, 2021
Case 1- Under the Eiffel tower
Case 2- Raghu, because on the first day of the school he was writing the exam.
Case 5 – The police man was sure because there was a very small hole which was created by breaking the window and nobody could enter through that small hole.
Priya tepan
June 15, 2021
Case 4 Inspector said that because he wanted to know that really rishab found that paper from his uncle’s written papers or not . For founding that rishab was lying or not.
Dhrithi G Rao
June 15, 2021
I guess these are the answers to the above given cases.
Case 1:
He sat under the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2:
The principal suspected Raghu because all the students would write the exam together. How come he was the only one writing the exam? So, this shows that Raghu lied.
Case 3:
I guess it is one of Joseph’s co-worker’s twin.
Case 4:
The inspector said so because Rishab knew that his uncle had revised the will. How did he know that? Why didn’t Rishab bring the will earlier?
Case 5:
Policeman was sure that nobody from outside entered the house because only tiny pieces and few pieces of the glass was inside the house and if someone from outside entered the house, they would have hit the glass harder due to which larger and many pieces of glass would have been inside the house.
Dhrithi G Rao
June 15, 2021
I guess these are the answers to the given cases.
Case 1:
He sat under the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2:
The principal suspected Raghu because all the students would write the exam together. How come he was the only one writing the exam? So, this shows that Raghu lied.
Case 3:
I guess it is one of Joseph’s co-worker’s twin.
Case 4:
The inspector said so because Rishab knew that his uncle had revised the will. How did he know that? Why didn’t Rishab bring the will earlier?
Case 5:
Policeman was sure that nobody from outside entered the house because only tiny pieces and few pieces of the glass was inside the house and if someone from outside entered the house, they would have hit the glass harder due to which larger and many pieces of glass would have been inside the house.
Priya tepan
June 15, 2021
Case 3 joseph understood who was the person. How? When they met the stranger talking about David after hearing about David joseph surprised and said I also know about David he was my friend.
Priya tepan
June 15, 2021
Case 2 The Principal suspect four new friends of Tina because The Principal wanted to knew that whom stolen Tina’s tuition fee . The Principal suspect raghu because raghu was lying that he was writing exam paper that day but exam was not on that day.
Aparna Jha
June 15, 2021
Case1 He might have gone to other Citi than Paris.
Case2 Raghu is the suspect.
Because if it is a normal day then how could he write an exam.
Case4 Because pages 113 and 114are adjacent pages.
Case5 Because if there was really any robbery then most of the glass pieces would have fallen inside the house.
Priya tepan
June 15, 2021
Case 1 Writer had his lunch on hot air balloon because the balloon is little up from the Eiffel tower so he could not saw the tower from it.
Priya tepan
June 15, 2021
Case 1 : Writer had his lunch on hot air balloon . Because hot air balloon is little up from the Eiffel tower so he could not saw the tower from it.
Case 2: Principal suspect four new friends of Tina because The Principal wanted to knew that whom stolen Tina’s tuition fee… so the Principal asked them that what they are doing at 8 : 00 am that day …
The Principal heard all the answers then they suspect raghu because raghu was lying that he was writing exam paper . But the exam are not on that day so how can he wrote exam paper that day so Principal found the theif who had stolen Tina’s tuition fee. Theif is raghu.
Case 3 : Joseph met him and understood that he was the man whom I heard from David. Because when they met the stranger man talking about David then Joseph surprised and said him what!you know about David he said yes so that’s how Joseph knew the stranger man..
Case 4 : Inspector said that because he wanted to know that really rishab found that paper from his uncle’s written papers or not. For finding that Rishab was lying or not.
Case 5 : The policeman was so sured because he noticed that only few tiny piece of glass were scattered about near broken window area so if someone from outside entered in the house then there had to be more pieces of the glass and the window had to be fully broken. So no outsider come in the house. Robbery is done by anyone from inside.
Yuvraj
June 15, 2021
In case 3
Joshep understood who was that stranger by seeing that stranger person because he had heard about him from his friend David then stranger might be David’s elder brother or his father.
Yuvraj
June 15, 2021
In case 2
Principal should suspect on Ron because Ron’s reason is utter for defending himself because his reason is very cheap among all friends.
Sai Vaibhav
June 15, 2021
Case 1: Guy de Maupassant ate his lunch at the top of the Eifell Tower
Harshit raj
June 15, 2021
In case 2 the principal suspect is on Raghu
Manas Jha
June 15, 2021
(in the case 2) Arushi was speaking lie
Carolyn Mary E
June 15, 2021
Case1= He was probably sitting somewhere which is not in Paris.
Case2=Raghu, because it is the first day so there wouldn’t be any exam.
Case3=David probably told Joseph the stranger’s name while talking about him(the stranger).
Case5=If there was only a little broken pieces which means there was only a small hole where the thief/burglar would not be able to enter.
S. Divya
June 15, 2021
1.His back was facing the Eiffel tower
2.Raghu – He wouldn’t have been asked to write a test on the first day of the school.
3. The stranger was David’s twin brother.
4. Pages 113 and114 were printed on the opposite sides of the same page.
5. The pieces of glass were outside the window , the window should have been hit from the inside…
Daksh Sharma
June 15, 2021
Case 1 : He had his lunch underground.
Case 2 : Debby because as she was running late she must have stolen the tution fees on the way.
Case 3 : He knew him because he was his friend but his name was changed so he couldnt recognise him by name.
Case 5 : Only few glass particles were scattered around, if a burglar had broken the window a lot of big glass pieces would have been scattered on the ground
KAASHVI GUJRATI
June 15, 2021
1. in his house where all windows are closed no door is open, in short a all sides closed room.
2. no one as why will tina bring his tuition fee to school .
3. because joseph has eyes to see who is that man.
4. because when rishab will put back the will inspector will take it and replace it with other.
5. because the pieces of window glass were scattered outside the house and is theif can only enter the house from breaking the glass window and most glass should be inside the house .
Ellin
June 15, 2021
case 1 he sat with his back facing the tower
case2 it was ron because most of the friends wre doing their own work so there is no way ron was talking to his friends
case3 the stranger s not related to joseph but knows him from his friend david
case4 (not sure)
case 5 the window was froken from the in side so most of the glass wass outside
Ellin
June 15, 2021
case 1 he sat with his back facing the tower
case2 it was ron because most of the friends wre doing their own work so there is no way ron was talking to his friends
case3 the stranger s not related to joseph but knows him from his friend david
case4 (not sure) my be the sydny sheldon is not that big of a book to have 113 or 114 pages
case 5 the window was froken from the in side so most of the glass wass outside
Aaditya Bhatta
June 15, 2021
Case 2 answer :-
This is the first day of the school . How can Raghu be writing the test . So Raghu stole Tina’s money
Kedarnath Bisoyi
June 15, 2021
Case 2 ans is ( Debby) because he camed late in that and he was only the theft.
Samradhi
June 15, 2021
In case 2, the principle suspected Raghu since there couldn’t have been an exam on the very first day
Jiya Jayaraj
June 15, 2021
Case-1
The writer sat on top of the tower and had lunch so he wouldn’t see the tower.
Case-2
The principal suspected Raghu as he was writing the exam paper while other students weren’t.
Case-3
Because the stranger looked and behaved just like David , Joseph’s friend.
Case-4
The inspector said so because Rishabh mentioned that he found the paper in between pages 113 and 114 which are two consecutive pages ..between these no such paper can be hidden.
Case-5
Because it was a small hole and through it a person can’t enter.
Malay Archit
June 15, 2021
1) It is the tallest monument but it is equal to 81 storey building so he must have gone to a 81 storey building
2) Raghu because 1 was late , others were talking in assembly , so assembly is for all , which exam was Raghu giving?
3) Maybe he would be twin brother of Joseph’s that friend
4) He said this because his nephew was lying as pages are always in between even and odd but 113 and 114 of book are odd even which is impossible for any book
5) As husband told that the burglar entered from outside and broke the window glass but if he entered from outside , maximum glass pieces should be broken and fallen inside the room as he entered from outside and broke the window in inward direction and so pieces should not be outside the room
Parishi Gudwal
June 15, 2021
1.) In Eiffel tower itself
2.) Raghu as it was first day of school and first day of school doesn’t have an exam .
3.) Due to talks about him ( particularly behaviour )
4.) Because of days gap between bill shown and death .
5.) Due to window cracked pieces as a big man cannot enter throw such a small hole .
Heer Anand Jagiwala
June 15, 2021
I want attend your summer camp
Jui Shah
June 15, 2021
Case-2
The principal suspects Raghu as he could not possibly be giving an exam, because it was the first day of school.
Aadyashrita Mohanty
June 15, 2021
1. on the tower, in an underground cell
2. Raghu, because he was writing the exam while others were not
3. They were introduced when the met, David was there with the stranger
4. He suspected that the pg113 and pg114 were not two different leaves of the book
5. Because the broken glass was outside the house, as if someone had broken out of the house
Jagriti tak
June 15, 2021
I feel good thank you so much
Nice mystery case
June 15, 2021
Ans :1place where the was not visible .
Ans:2 Debby called Iam coming 8:10 but he present
8:00.
Ans :3 But he was only heared by dravid but he was not related Joseph.
Ans :4 inspector diwakar called Mr bhoshle well i am not sure how genuine your will is but it is better if you put back where you found it .
Ans :5 policemen called window glass broken inside a few tiny pieces it was burgland not outsiders come to home .
Jagriti tak
June 15, 2021
I feel very good
Bhavya Dey
June 15, 2021
Case 1
He will be sitting on the Eiffel tower to have his lunch.
Case 2
It’s Ron because with whom was he chatting because everyone were busy in their work.
Case 3
Because he met him the second time.
Case 4
Because before he said that it was 10 days but now he saying it was a week ago where in a week there are only 7 days.
Case 5
He identified it because a robber cannot go inside through such a small hole.
Ayush Santhosh
June 15, 2021
1) He ate his lunch inside the Eiffel Tower.
2) Raghu. It was the first day of school. Nobody writes exams on the first day without first learning the portions.
3) Maybe he had a badge on???
4) Mr. Bhonsle was dismissed on April 20, Rishab found the will a week ago, when Mr. Bhonsle still had not been dismissed.
5) If a burglar had entered into their house through the window from the outside , the glass would have broken and most of the shards would have fallen inside the house. In this case, only few shards were found inside the house and more on the outside, indicating that someone broke the glass from the inside of the house.
Aryan
June 15, 2021
1) writer was on Eiffel Tower and was having lunch so he couldn’t see Eiffel Tower
2) If there was exam Debby would come early and Ron would study instead of chatting and arushi would also know because she was reading school news so raghu was suspect
3) he was David I think
4) IDK
5) If thief or someone break in broken glass pieces would be big
Atmadeep Roy
June 15, 2021
1. The writer had his lunch on the top floor of any multi storeyed building which is higher than the Eiffel Tower.
OR
The writer took his lunch outside the city.
2. Raghu because he told lie as no one could not give exam on the first day of school.
3. Joseph met a person whose face resembled with David.
4. Most probably Mr Bhosle rote the will for his children after 10th April and before or on 20th April.
5. The window glass had been broken from inside the room so the question of robbery was unimportant.
Aradhya Jha
June 15, 2021
2. Raghu because on the first day of school examination cannot be held.
4. Page 113 and page 114 is single paper page 114 is on the back of 113
Praneet Ingle
June 15, 2021
1) on the tip of the Eiffel tower
2)Debby because he reached school at 8:10 that’s he must have done the robbery
3) Because in that particular area Joseph would have been familiar with all the others except the stranger
4)I don’t know
5) Because the size of a bulgrary or any other human being is large so a large part of the window should have been broken
Thanikachalam
June 15, 2021
Case 1-mr Guy de Maupassant would have sat in the Eiffel tower itself because it will not be visible to him because he is in it.
Case-2 It was the first day of school and there will be no exam conducted so it will be Raghu
Case-3 the starnger would have been alone
Case-4 because in any book 113 and 114 is made of the same page but faces two different sides
Case-5 The police was sure because if the glass was broken from inside there would have been more pieces inside
Sanjana Tiwari
June 15, 2021
1. Guy De Maupassant made the lunch point at the base of the Eiffel Tower
2. Raghu was the suspect
5. Because broken glass outside of the house
Meghashree
June 15, 2021
3.Beacause he might have heard him talking on the phone
Yukti
June 15, 2021
Ans 1) He was at the base of Effiel Tower.
Meghashree
June 15, 2021
Raghu took the fee beacause there were no exam going on
Shaishaw Kumar
June 15, 2021
Case 2, I think Raghu is the suspected person because, he was writing the exam paper on the first day of the school. Generally no school takes exam at its first day of the session.
Meghashree
June 15, 2021
1. The writer had his lunch under the Eiffel tower.
Shreyashi
June 15, 2021
4- he said so because he knew that Rishab was lying…because page no 113 and 114 never comes side by side !!
And he said that he found it between the page 113 and 114 which is impossible!
Kanishka Das
June 15, 2021
1. On top of the tower or in a room with no windows.
2.Raghu, because it’s impossible to have an exam on the first day of school.
3.Perhaps someone related to David?
4. Pages 113 and 114 are two sides of the same paper, hence no paper or will can be kept within them.
5. Since and intruder broke inside from outside of the house, majority of the glass shards had to be scattered inside the house
Shaishaw Kumar
June 15, 2021
Case 4 ,It is possible that he has written a story and Rishab has just found a page of that book.
Kanak Goel
June 15, 2021
In case 2 Arushi is the suspect
Shaishaw Kumar
June 15, 2021
Case :1 The place would be just below the tall Eiffel tower. I think so because anyone would not be able to see the tall Eiffel tower which is just above your head.
Shivam Chauhan
June 15, 2021
case2: raghu is the person who thief her tuition fee ,because there is no exam held that day.
Shreyashi
June 15, 2021
1- he would have his lunch just below the Eiffel Tower
Shaishaw Kumar
June 15, 2021
Case 2 ,Raghu, it wasn’t exam time because if it was exam time then why would Tina have brought her tution fee.
Bharaghave shri c g
June 15, 2021
1. He must be sitting backwards or under the Eiffel tower.
2. Raghu is the culprit, because it is mentioned in the question that “First day of the school”.So on every First day nobody is gonna , conduct the exam
4.Rishab said that he found the will paper between the pages 113 and 114 of Sidney Sheldon..but the page 113 and 114 pages will not be in alternative order . So the incepter found that he is lying
5. Because more off glass pieces is seen outside than inside becaxuse whomever breaks the glass from inside more of glass pieces should be there outside rather than inside.
3 shadow.
AVNI BHARDWAJ
June 15, 2021
Case-2 RAGHU IS THE THIEF AS IT WAS THE FIRST DAY IN THE SCHOOL AND THERE IS NO EXAM ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE SCHOOL.
Shaishaw Kumar
June 15, 2021
( case 5 ) How could a person can enter through a very small broken glass. The broken part was even smaller than his head.
Bernice
June 15, 2021
1. He ate his lunch in a shop under the Eiffel tower.
2.It is Raghu.
3. He understood it was a friend of David’s.
4. Because he is lying. Nobody can put the will between those pages as they booth are printed on the same page as they are back to back.
5. Because it is too small for a burglar or an adult to get through.
AVNI BHARDWAJ
June 15, 2021
Case-1 THE WRITTER SHOUL EAT HIS LUNCH NEAREST TO THE TOWER BUT FACING OPPISITE TO IT.
Avani Nilesh Paygude
June 15, 2021
1. Inside the Eiffel tower
2. Raghu, as there won’t be any exam on the first day of school
3. He was David’s brother and looked just like him
4. Pg 113 and 114 will be back to back and nothing can be put between them
5. More pieces of broken glass were on outside which means that the window glass was broken from inside
Parithi R
June 15, 2021
Case 5
The window was broken from inside
Ruth vilas kokane
June 15, 2021
Case 4 – the inspector says this because Rishab said that he found that paper between 113 and 114 . There is no no. in between 113 and 114.
Araghya Gupta
June 15, 2021
Answer 1 = he must have locked the door and curtained the windows that way he can not see the effle tower.
Answer 2 = Raghu stealed the money. which exam is on first day of tuiton.
Answer 3 = he might have seen his photo in google.
Answer 4 = he said it because 114 and 115 are togethere , 112 and 113 are togethere. 113 and 114 aren’t togethere.
Answer 5= he said it because because if burglery happened there should be a whole pile of glass shater inside
Parithi R
June 15, 2021
Case 2
Raghu
How could there be exam paper during the first day of school
Vansh Garg
June 15, 2021
Case 5
Ans-because the hole was so small
Ruth vilas kokane
June 15, 2021
Case 2 – answer is raghu because he is writing exam papers on first day of the school.
Parithi R
June 15, 2021
Case 1
81 Storey building
Enba sekaran.M
June 15, 2021
Interesting
Aditya Joshi
June 15, 2021
Question1answer – He will sit on the of Eiffel tower to eat lunch.
Question 2 answer – Debby was the suspect because they all were in school at the time the fee got lost and Debby said that he was late.
Question 3 answer-
Question 4 answer- There is a will in the book between page 113-114 written by Sidney Sheldon.
Question 5 answer- The window was broken very small than it was needed for a man to go inside and there were only few pieces inside the house which means that the outside area of the house is cleaned and some glass pieces are scattered for a show
Kavya Pal
June 15, 2021
1. In other city of France .
2. Ron
3.
4. ’cause the nephew dated the revising date of the will 10 days back of the proposal of original will.
5. The glasses that were broken were too tiny for a person to pass through it .
Vansh Garg
June 15, 2021
Case 2
Ans- Raghu, because the exam would be for all students and only he was writing the exam and others were not
Alina Khan
June 15, 2021
1.Guy de Maupassant ate lunch everyday at the base of the Eiffel tower, because it was the only place in Paris in which he could not see it.
2.The principal suspected Debby.
3.He was a twin brother of one of Joseph’s friend.
4.
5.When a window was broken by the outside of a thief ,most of its glass will be found on the inside of the house,not on the outside of the house.
Vansh Garg
June 15, 2021
Case 1
Ans – Under the tower
MANVI VERMA
June 15, 2021
Case no.1 . Ans- He do the lunch in her house with close windows so whenever he do lunch in house he don’t see see the Eifell tower.
Case no.2.Ans- Principal suspected Raghu because during morning assembly no student do exam paper.
Case no . 3. Ans- He Guessed that he was David Friend because David told about his friend that he will visit only one time.
Case no.4.Ans- Risabh’s property papers were fraud because dewakar had known by on the page no. 113 and 114 of Sedeny Sheldon that Risabh was telling a lie.
Case no.5 .Ans- The Hole of of window was so small that no one could enter from outside and also no one not go outside this make the police so sure.
Prarthana MK
June 15, 2021
In the second case raghu is the thief because he said that I am waiting I was writing exam paper but on the first day of school nobody will give exam
Isha D
June 15, 2021
Case 1: He will eat under the Eiffel tower.
Case 2: The principal will suspect Raghu as no school will give an exam in the first day.
Case 3: David and the guy he met right now will be twins.
Case 4: The Second Will is the Will from the storybook which the writer has written
Case 5: If a burglar has broken into the house, then the glass pieces inside the house will be more.
Aryan Kumar
June 15, 2021
Case:1
He had his lunch in a close room or office.
Case:2
Raghu ,as how he will write the exam paper on the first day.
It is very amazing that Tina inthe first day of school ? brought tution fee!
Case:3
Joseph must not have heard about his appearance but David must have said about the behaviours of the stranger .So David must have recognised him.
Case:4
It must be for that reason because he found it a week ago and he showed it to inspecter after a week not on that day.He must have made it by himself.
Case:5
Because the burglar if enters the window so all the particles or glasses of the window will fall inside the house because the force will be made from outside .
V.Akshaya sri
June 15, 2021
2. Raghu. On the first day of school, there would be no exams.
3. The stranger was a twin of Joseph’s friend.
4. Page 113 and page 114 are front and back sides of a single paper. So there is no gap in between.
5. If a person had broken glass from outside , more glass pieces should have been scattered inside the house. But there is less pieces inside the house. So no one has entered the house from outside.
Vanshika shekhar
June 15, 2021
Case no. I. Home
Case no. 2. Raghu
Case no. 3. A mastermind criminal
Case no. 4. Because the will was fake.
Case no. 5. Because no body can enter from such a tiny hole.
Raghav Mittal
June 15, 2021
1 – he ate food at the base of the Eiffel tower because it was the only place where Eiffel tower wasn’t visible
2 – Raghu is the culprit because he cannot give the test alone whereas others were doing diffrent stuff
3 – because David was with Joseph or with the person who introduced them
4 – inspector said this because the page 113 and 114 is the two sides of one single page so how could he have got it in the between of the page
5 – because the broken glass opening was so small that no human can enter through it
Advaith Santosh
June 15, 2021
Case 1 : Guy de Maupassant was mentally and physically weak by 1889 when the tower was finished as he died in 1893 at an asylum in Paris. Thus, he would have eaten his lunch at his home, closing the windows and pulling over the curtains to hide the view. When he would have wanted to have the lunch outside, he would have eaten just under the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2 : Raghu is the most probable suspect as on the first day he could not have given any exams.
Case 3 : The stranger must have been the twin brother of David.
Case 4 : Waiting for it to be solved?Need to consult Holmes…?
Case 5 : Since the couple reported the glass were find outside their house and a few pieces inside, the impact was from inside causing it to fall outside. Someone had not tried to break into the house from outside, but someone did break the glass from inside…
Yash Bhardwaj
June 15, 2021
I solved the 3rd mystery that is Joseph knew that the man he met was a stranger
Mansi Singh
June 15, 2021
CASE 1
He would sit at the base or top of the eiffel tower.
CASE 2
Raghu
CASE 3
He was the twin brother of David.
CASE 4
Dont know the answer
CASE 5
Because there were not much broken glasses .
Shubham Parekh
June 15, 2021
1) From his closed home 2) Raghu -There can not be exam on first day of school 3) From his dress code
4) when any book is opened , pages will always be in even and odd so 113 and 114 is not possible
5) When window is broken by stone it will come inside the house. Police found only tiny particles of glass. o
cracks will appear on the side the glass is broken
Anmol Kumar
June 15, 2021
case 1.
Ans. The writer must be sitting below the Eiffel Tower due to which he could not see the tower.
Case2.
Ans. The principal suspected Raghu.
Case 3.
Ans. He understood due to his behaviour.
Case 5.
Ans. Because the hole in the window was so small that a person cannot go in and out of the window.
Sudhakar yadav
June 15, 2021
At last de Maupassant thought of a safe place where he could avoid the tower that he obviously despised so much: underneath the Eiffel tower itself. Every day, he had lunch at the tower’s base restaurant, just because “inside the restaurant was one of the few places where I could sit and not actually see the Tower!”20-Sep-2016 answer case 1
Y.Bhavana
June 15, 2021
Case 1
Under the Eiffel tower
Case 2
Arushi
Case 3
Famous man
Govind J Nair
June 15, 2021
1-
2 – It is Raghu because there are no exams on the first day of school
3- It may be his lost brother
4- how can a will be written in a book of Sidney Sheldon
5- because of the glass
Yuvraj kalra
June 15, 2021
Case 1: wether he have lunch outside the Paris
Case 2:principal will respect third friend Raghu because in any school there is not any exam on the first day of school so this can be a lie from Raghu that he is writing the exam paper.
Case 3: it can be possible that David tell Joseph about the behaviour and the way he greets someone for on which transfer maybe he was coming.
Case 4: the inspector save this to ensure that Rishabh was telling lie or truth.
Case 5: the police man was sure because someone break the window from outside then all the glass pieces you will fall all inside the house rather that outside of house.
SHREE ROUTRAY
June 15, 2021
1- He had his lunch on the top of Eiffel Tower
2-Raghu is the suspect, since 4 of them belong to the same class but Raghu was writing the exam, and 3 others weren’t implies he is lying.
3- The stranger was David himself.
4- Mr. Bhosle said him to put it back from where he had found the new will because, Sidney Sheldon is the name of the AUTHOR and not the book. Hence the statement made by Rishab is invalid and he’s lying.
5- If any intruder would have broke into the house through the window, then the piece of glasses should have fallen inside the house but those were found outside the house, implies there was no intruder.
Shuja Mahdi
June 15, 2021
In the case 2, Principal would suspect Raghu as it was the 1st day of the school and he said that he was preparing for exam…
Sriya Padmajan
June 15, 2021
Case 1
In the Eiffel Tower itself.
Case 2
Raghu, because there won’t be any exams on the first day of school.
Case 3
Because Joseph met the stranger.
Paras jain
June 15, 2021
1IN CASE 1 HE WAS EATING HIS LUNCH FROM THAT BUILDINGS TOPS
2 THE FREND WHICH COME LATE WAS THEIF BECAUSE THERE WAS TIME WHEN SCHOOL WAS GOING ON FROM NARLY 7:30 AND HE IS COMING 40 MINUTES LATER
3 WHEN HE HAS MET THE PERSON AND ASKED HIM THAT YOU KNOW DAVID I AM HIS FRIEND
4 BECAUSE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO KEEP IT BETWEEN 133 AND 134
5 BECAUSE THE GLASS WAS BROKEN FROM INSIDE THE HOUSE THERE WERE FEW INSIDE AND MOST WERE OUTSIDE
Alleezbath
June 15, 2021
(Case -5 ) The policeman was very sure because – the crack of the window was so small that no one can come in the house useing the crack of the window
Samiksha Shakya
June 15, 2021
Case 1- It may be possible that he was sit under the Eeffil tower for his lunch so than he can’t see it .
Case 2- The principal suspected to Raghu because he said, “he was writing his exam paper at that time but Arushi, said they were in the school Assembly so how it’s possible that Raghu was writting his exam paper. So other students are honest .
3- It could be Joseph’ s twin .
4- The inspector said that because Rishab confirmed the court that his uncle revised the will precisely ten days ago ,April 10 but he said to the inspector he he found it a week ago in book collection so he is lying.
5- The policeman said surely because only a few pieces of broken glass were inside the house .So it implies that if the burglar had entered through the window by breaking the window from outside , it has to be a good amount of broken glasses inside the house but there it is not a good number of pieces.
Harshika mantri
June 15, 2021
First answer- he will sit inside a room with no window so he cannot see the Eiffel tower ? or he can live away from Paris like in a far state
Second answer- Raghu is lying because at the first tution day how can he write exam
Third answer- because he had heard about him from David
Fourth answer-
Anvesha
June 15, 2021
CASE 2:Raghu is the theif while all the students were doing other activities ON THE FIRST DAY OF SCHOOL and exam on the same day?.
charan karthik buaragayala
June 15, 2021
case1
on top of the eiffel tower there is a room the writer sat in the room and ate his lunch because when he is eating he is sitting in the room on top of the eiffel tower he can,t see it when he is sitting on top of the room in the tower .
case2
raghu because on the first day of school no one will have exams he lied to the teacher.
case3
maybe david sended a stranger to joseph to prank him.
case4
mr divakar said to put thw will back where rishabh found it beacause it was rishabhs uncle personal property
case5
the police man so sure because the window hole was so small and the burgular coudn,t even broken into the house
Prahlad
June 15, 2021
Case 2 – arushi , because no one reads newspaper in the assembly
Tanishka
June 15, 2021
Case 1: maybe inside the Eiffel tower because he won’t be able to see the tower then
Case 2: I think Debby because how did he know when the fees was lost and the exact time he enters the school?
Case 3: I think it was his Debby himself rest i don’t know this one
Case 4: Sidney Sheldon is a writer, not a book
Case 5: if someone has broken from outside, the most shattered glass would be inside the house but the most glass pieces were outside the house, which means someone brie the window from inside
Hassan Ahmad
June 15, 2021
When is the exam.
Dis choudhary
June 15, 2021
Hi ,I am dia I have now only solved the case 2 I think that the answer should be that 2 point
Dis choudhary
June 15, 2021
Hi ,I am dia I have now only solved the case 2 I think that the answer should be that 2 point
I do not know if it is correct but I enjoyed solving it
Thank you
Good day
Priyadarshini Sahoo
June 15, 2021
Case 1: Effiel Tower restaurant
Case 2: Ron is the suspect, because except Ron others were busy so with whom Ron was talking!
Case 3: Because if the stranger would be David’s friend the he would be Joseph’s friend also.
Case 5: Because if someone else would have come from outside to then he would have broken whole window to comfortably come inside.
Manveer Singh
June 15, 2021
1:- he will have his lunch from the top of the tower
2:- Raghu. As he was the only one to give the exam.. why others were not giving.
3:- he was David’s father.
4:- there is no page between 113 & 114 page 113 is usually on the right side of the page and 114 is the next page.. so how can he place the will between the two pages
5:- if the window was broken from outside , the broken pieces would have been scattered inside the house.
Achyuth Ashok
June 15, 2021
Case1- Outside Paris
Case2- Raghu
Case3- David told him that the stranger was his relative and he would be visiting him that day. Joseph saw David along with the stranger that day.
Case4- There is no page113 in the book ‘Sidney Sheldon’.
Case5- If someone had entered from outside, the broken pieces of glass would have fallen outside.
Zeal
June 15, 2021
Case 1: The writer had it Lunch in the Eiffel tower, So that he cannot see it.
Case 2: The Principal Suspected Raghu because he cannot write the exam paper on th first day of school, which means Raghu is lying.
Case 3:Joseph has never met the stranger and when he saw him he understood that the person was a stranger.
Case 4: Inspector said this because he knew that Rishabh was lying as he said that he found the page between 113 and 114, but there cannot be any page between them.
Case 5:The Policeman was so sure because the window had too small hole for a person to pass.
Srushti
June 15, 2021
case 2
Raghu is the thief
Because Ron was chatting with his friends he can do this in assembly. Arushi was reading news possible in assembly Debby was late but how can someone write exam paper in assembly. He had stolen the tution fee in the time of assembly.
shreeya prabhu
June 15, 2021
case 1. He have lunch down of the Eiffle tower case 2. Principal suspected raghu because he was only writing the exam paper
Case 3. He has meeted him early
Case 4. Because it is their problem why they should involve
Case 5. Because the window was not broken that much that someone can enter from the window
Aditya Sharma
June 15, 2021
Case 2 – the principal will suspect Arushi
Charitha Narayanasa
June 15, 2021
Case- 1 ans is under the Eiffel tower
Case -2 ams is Raghu…
Pratyusha
June 15, 2021
1) A room where there were no windows.
2) The principal suspected Raghu because he was writing his exam paper on the first day of school which is not possible.
3) Maybe the stranger knew. Joseph well and he would have approached him and introduced himself such that Joseph recognised him from what he had heard from David about the stranger.
4)The inspector said so because the writer left his will to his children on April 20 and Rishab, his nephew said that the will was revised on April 10 when the will was not even passed.
5)The policeman was so sure because if someone from outside would have broken into the house from the window, there would have been more glass particles inside the house but there were just tiny glass pieces. Instead someone from inside went through the window due to which there were more glass pieces outside the house.
Devadharshini Naicker
June 15, 2021
1)he will sit under the eiffel tower so that it cannot be seen
2)it’s Raghu because in whole class why he only giving at this time while they all are in their work
4)because it’s after uncle died if uncle had inherited him then why world his other will would be given to government and other would be kept in book?
5) because if person would broke window from outside he should broken it enough big to fit in inside it so it can only be done be insider
Kalyani
June 15, 2021
1. He ate lunch in the restaurant right below the Eiffel Tower.
2. The principal suspected Ron, as how could he talk to his friends
when everyone was busy reading the news, writing the paper, etc.?
3. I couldn’t solve?
4. I couldn’t solve this too ?
5. If someone broke the glass and entered inside from outside, then there would be many pieces of glass inside and very less outside. But in this case, the glass pieces were less inside and more pieces outside, indicating that the glass had been broken from inside, and that NO ONE ENTERED THE HOUSE FROM OUTSIDE.
I solved these without the help of Google and without the help of parents or any one.
Pranjali
June 15, 2021
1. 7th arrondissement
2. Raghu, because one can’t have exam on first day of school moreover arushi said that morning assembly was going on , so how can Raghu give exam that time.
3. This is because he was David’s twin sibling.
4. This is because page no. 113 and page no. 114 are the opposite sides of same page .
5. Because the window was broken from inside.
Harsh vardhan
June 15, 2021
Guy de
Harsh vardhan
June 15, 2021
The principal suspected four of her new friends and questioned them
Sacgjt
June 15, 2021
At his house
Harikrishnan
June 15, 2021
1. He sat down at the base of the Eiffel tower
2. Raghu, as when he is writing the exam paper, the others also should.
3. He was a twin brother of one of Joseph’s friends.
4. The inspector said this as page 113 and 114 are the front and back of a single page.
5. When a window is broken from the outside by a thief, most of the glass will be found on the inside of the house, not on the outside of the house.
Vedantipanghate
June 15, 2021
Case 1 ans: out of the city
Case 2 ans:Raghu, because he told the principal that he was writing the exam paper.but the exams are not held on the first day of school.
Case 4 ans:the inspector said this because rishab is lying, as there is no gap between page no.113 and 114.
Case 5 ans:the policeman was sure because there were only a few tiny pieces of window glass particles scattered inside the house and no outsider can enter the window from the small hole.
Adwait Shiva
June 15, 2021
1. In the Eiffel Tower
2.Raghu-No exam on first day
4.Page 113 and 112 are together
5.The glass would fall inside if someone broke in
Harsh vardhan
June 15, 2021
Joseph meet stranger whom he had never seen before he just heard about him from his friend David but descriptions of his appearance were ever mentioned neither was the stranger related to Joseph nor was he famous but the moment Joseph meet him he understood who he was
Tatai Mandal
June 15, 2021
Case-2 Raghu was the theif
Monish Kumar Dutta
June 15, 2021
Answers
1. The writer must have had his lunch in one of the restaurant present in the Eiffel tower itself
2.principal suspected Raghu as there no exam which takes place in the very first day of school
3. The stranger must have been a twin brother of one of Joseph’s friends.
4. Because in every book the left page number is always a even number .
5. The police officer was sure as , if the window had been broken from outside then broken glasses pieces would have been scattered inside the house ..which was not the case.. thus the window must be broken from inside
Kavya Bhhasin
June 15, 2021
1. The writer had his lunch in the Eiffel tower
2. The principal suspected Raghu because it was the first day of school, hence an exam could not have been conducted
3. The stranger was David’s twin brother
5. If the house had been entered by breaking through the window then, the majority of the glass pieces would be inside the house not outside
Moli Shukla
June 15, 2021
Case 1= The writer have launch in Paris, French.
Case 2= Raghu sad that I was writing the exam paper but on the first day of the school there is no exam so how he can write the exam paper. So principle should suspect he.
Case 3= The stranger was David’s friend.
Case 4= the Inspector said these words because after the two days his nephew Rishab produce a new will in the court, claiming that his uncle had actually left all his Fortune to him.
Case 5= The police man noticed that only a few tiny pieces of window glass particles was scattered around near the broken window area inside the house he told the the husband that it was a buglary and no outsider had entered the house true that window
Pushkar jha
June 15, 2021
Case1 He must have made the launch underground.
Case2 The principal must have suspected Raghu because it was the time of assembly and why was he writing the exam at that time.
Case3 He had never seen him before means that he konws everyone there except David’s friend so he understood he was him
Case4 He said this because MR. Bhosle must have preserved those papers in that book to give it to their children later but his nephew Rishabh had found it earlier.
Case5 He said this because the tiny glass particles were only few tiny particles were scattered which means that the glass was broken from inside because if the glass was broken from inside the tiny glass particles would have to be scattered all the ground near the area of the window but in this case it didn’t happened.
Sivanarayan maniveli A
June 15, 2021
Case 1 ans = 81 stroy building
Case 2 ans =Ron because there is no mobile in school
Case 3 ans = The stranger gave him a
Shake hand
Case 4 ans = It is a page of that book
Case 5 ans = There is small prices of glass of window where broken
Vaibhav ram bansode
June 15, 2021
Sir or mam I have solved the case no. 5
The police man noticed that if we broken a window glass all glass particle will be inside the house when burglary or any outsider broke the window to entered the house for robbery , but the husband was pointing to the broken window glasses on outside means not a burglary or outsider broke the window glasses
Ridhima
June 15, 2021
Ans 1 he would do his lunch in his house basement
Ans 2 Raghu had stolen the tution fee of Tina because if all students are not doing their exam why Raghu is doing his exam
Michelle Furtado
June 15, 2021
Case 1 Eiffel Tower
Case 2 Raghu because it was the first day of school
Case 3 Do not know
Case 4 The inspector said this because the will was from Rishab’s Uncle’s book
Case 5 The policeman knew it because how did the husband know that the burglar had come through the window
Michelle Furtado
June 15, 2021
Case 1 Eiffel Tower
Case 2 Raghu because it was the first day of school
Case 3 Do not know
Case 4 The inspector said this because the will was from Rishab’s Uncle’s book
Case 5 The policeman said this because how did the husband know that the burglar had come through the window
Ishmam Mehnaz
June 15, 2021
Case no 2 Debby
Sakshi Singh
June 15, 2021
Case 1 – He had his lunch under the tower.
Case 2- Raghu
Case 3 – Joseph understood that he was the same person whom his friend David is talking about by his talking way and behaviour.
Case 4 – Because the inspector wants to know his intentions.
Case 5 – Because the broken hole in the window is too small
Umaima Suzain.
June 15, 2021
In 1st case, the writer might have had his lunch at the tower’s base restaurant where the tower is not visible.
Harsh vardhan
June 15, 2021
Diwakar questioned rishab a week ago I was going through his book collection when I found the paper in between pages 113 and 114 of sendey sheldon
Shayan Khan
June 15, 2021
At raghu because it was the first day of school and he is saying that he was writing the exam paper
Shayan
June 15, 2021
Case 5
Because the burglar cannot enter from a smallhole
Koijam Heeyaisana
June 15, 2021
Case 1 Answer He eats at the Eiffel Tower .
Case 2 Answer The Principal suspected Raghu because he can’t have exam at the first day of school.
Case 3 Answer The stranger introduced himself.
Case 4 Answer Page 113 and 114 are on the same paper so how can the will be in between them.
Case 5 Answer The window glass was not broken large enough for a person to enter through it.
charvi
June 15, 2021
no.5 was-
there were hardly any glass pieces inside and if someone broke the window frame outside many pieces should fall in
charvi
June 15, 2021
no.5 was-
there were hardly any glass peices inside and if someone broke the window frome outside many peices shd fall in
Shreelekha Behera
June 15, 2021
1- It must be out side of Paris
2- Raghu was taken Tina’s tuition fee because on the first day of school who can have the exam.
3- If he was a stranger so how can Joseph ‘s friend David know him and if he was famous so why people were not there around him to take pictures and signature. He was his friend David.
4- Sorry I don’t know the answer of number four please forgive me.
5- Because a person cannot come inside by a small hole it must be any animal.
Triambika Tarei
June 15, 2021
2.Raghu
3.police
4.113 and 114 is a single page
5.if some one have broke the window from outside then there will many glass
pieces inside the house
1. On the roof of Eiffel Tower
Debmallya Chakraborty
June 15, 2021
Case 1 : The writer have his lunch upon the Eiffel tower.
Case 2: It was Raghu who stoled Tina’s tuition fee. Because at 08:00 am no schools were open at all.
Case 3: I don’t know the answer.
Case 4: None of Sidney Sheldon’s books have no more pages than 110.
Case 5: If it caused by any outsider the pieces of glasses lying inside the house not outside of the house. So the police was sured about it.
Diya Mishra
June 15, 2021
Case 2 : in case 2 Ron was suspected by principal because if the timing of school is 8 am how ron was chatting with friends at 8 am after that he was also present in school
So the suspected student is Ron
Anushka Deshmukh
June 15, 2021
Answer of first mystery is he must have his lunch under the Eiffel tower so he can not see it
Harsh vardhan
June 15, 2021
It was not a burglary and no outsider had entered his house through that window
Harshpreet Kaur
June 15, 2021
2. Raghu
3. He has heard about him
4. Because if someone had to burgarly he/she will break it whole piece of glass
Not tiny pieces
Sulbha Yadav
June 15, 2021
Answer of Case:2
The principal suspected Raghu because there is no exam on the first day of school.
Rudraansh
June 15, 2021
That was just amazing ?
Niveditha Chowdary
June 15, 2021
Case 3 – I think Joseph is famous so that the stranger knows who he was .
Siddhant jain
June 15, 2021
Case 1 answer: top floor of Eiffel tower itself.
Case 2 answer: Raghu, as it was the first day of school, so how can he write exam paper.
Case 3 answer: everyone would be stranger whom I don’t know. So the guy is stranger.
Case 4 answer: because inspector knew that nephew is lieing as page no. 113 and 114 are the both sides of one paper.
Case 5 answer: inspector was sure because broken area of window glass was too short to get the burglary entered.
Devanshi
June 15, 2021
The answers to the questions are….
1- The writer sat in the tower (that was the only place he could not see the tower)
2- Raghu took tina’s fee ( there are no papers so early)
3- David’s friend was wearing an I-D (he probably was coming from the office )
4- 113 and 114 are the opposite sides of a page.(the left side is always even and the right side is odd!)
5- The window was broken to the least ( somebody could not have fit through such a small place )
Vaishnavi
June 15, 2021
Answers .
Case 1 = Other part of France.
Case 2 = Arushi because how can she read news in morning assembly.
Case 3 = Because David has given descr
iption of his Look ,may be.
Case 4 = No…??
Case 5 = Because to enter through small broken window is impossible
Agnish mandal
June 15, 2021
In case 2 – Ron was suspect by principal because Ron is telling the truth but the others telling meaningless word
Aliyah Masroor
June 15, 2021
1. In a room with roof closed and no window.
2. Raghu, because how can he give test on the first day of school
3. Maybe David had introduced
4. There cannot be any page between pg 113 and 114
5. A human cannot enter through a small hole
Saptami Roy
June 15, 2021
Case 2 answer is Raghu because it was the class timing and he said he was writting exam paper
M.yukthi abhinav
June 15, 2021
1.under the Eiffel tower.
2.Raghu is the thief because whole assembly going on anyone cannot write exam…….
3.because David is beside of Joseph…..
5.some one from inside had given money to outside person by breaking window….
Rishika patil
June 15, 2021
1) The writer eat his lunch out of the Paris city
2) principal suspected Ron because it was not time to chat with friend
3) David has told about his habit and his nature
4) because it was 10 days old will
5) because a robber can’t enter from such a small place
Vaishnavi DR
June 15, 2021
Case 2 it is Raghu ,as it was first day of the school how could he write exam
Aryan Gujarathi
June 15, 2021
Case 1 – He had his lunch in the Eiffel Tower!
Aditi ananya
June 15, 2021
1. Hot air balloon
2.Raghu. who gives exam on the first day of school that was fishy.
3. David just introduce Joseph and the stranger to each other that’s why he know who’s the stranger
4.
5. If someone entered the house the hole in the window would have been bigger not some pieces
Pujasrii
June 15, 2021
case 1:Inside the tower.
Case 2:Raghu, because he said he was writing exam but it is the first day of school.
Case 3:His friend would have informed about his arrival.
Case 4:The pages 113 and 114 are in the same piece of paper
Case 5:If it was a burglar there should be a big hole in window.
Rishita Samanta
June 15, 2021
1) He must have eaten his lunch outside Paris.
2) Principal must have suspected Raghu beacause when Tina lost her fee it was the first day of school then how can Raghu give the exam
4) The inspector said this because the will Rishab presented was the fake will as Rishab told he found the will from the book of Sidney shedlon between pages 113 and 114 but as we all know there is no place in any book of the world between page no 113 & 114 to keep anything as the page no group we know is (112-113) &(114-115)
Then how he found the will.
S.B.Bharath Karkuvel
June 15, 2021
Answers
1.He was sitting top of the Eiffel Tower
2.Raghu stole the fee because there will be no exams on the first day of school
3.The stranger must be twin brother of his friend
4.Page no.113 to 114 cannot exist because odd numbers are on the right side of the book
Jaiveer shekhawat
June 15, 2021
Raghu was the theaf he was said the l am writting a exam paper because in school no any examination he was a theaf.??️
Disha S
June 15, 2021
Case 1: the writer might have had his lunch on the tower itself. Hence he will not be able to see the Eiffel tower.
Case 2: the principle has suspected Raghu because he was writing his exam during morning assembly.
Case 3: Joseph has heard about the stranger’s behaviour by David hence he understood who that person was.
Case 4: Sidney Sheldon is a author who writes mostly crime fiction books….. Hence the will found inside that book might be the will related to the story of that book. Hence the inspector told those words
Case 5: the person who did the robbery is not an outsider because if he was an outsider who broke into the house the glass pieces would have been fallen more inside the house but the person who had done the robbery broke the glass from inside in order to make them suspect that it was a burgalar who broke into the house.
-Disha S
Rounak Shekhar Jena
June 15, 2021
Case 1 : Inside his home with windows closed so that he can’t see the tower
case 2 : Debby. Because she was late, which means she was engaged in doing something. So she can be the
culprit
case 3 : by asking him his name
Niveditha Chowdary
June 15, 2021
Case 2 – the principal suspected Ron , arushi, Raghu and Debby . Because they are the friends of Tina and who knows about the tution fee of Tina
Shriyansh
June 15, 2021
Ok
B.Shruthika
June 15, 2021
Case 1 : The writer might take lunch on Eiffel Tower itself.
Case 2:The principal might suspect Raghu, because on the first day of school no exam will be conducted.
Case 3:The stranger might be David itself.
Case 4: Consecutive numbers( here it is page113 and page114) doesn’t have any number( here it’s page) between them.
Case 5: The window might be outside and there might be no entry into the house through that window .
Somansu Tiwari ??
June 15, 2021
2 ouestion answer
According to Arushi assembly was there in school . Then how did Raghu was writing his exam at the same moment. All four of them are friends in same section and division . If one was in assembly then every one must be in assembly. So Raghu stole the money ????????????????
Shagun Mishra
June 15, 2021
for the case 1 i think he sat on the Eiffel tower and had his lunch. for case 2 i think the principal suspected either Raghu or Arushi . for case 3 i guess he must have some information from David that’s how he recognized.
for case 4 he must have taken it from another writer’s book. for case 5 i guess the burgler coudn’t enter from a small space and how was the couple so sure about that.
Akshayaa sri.K
June 15, 2021
1. The person was eating his lunch on the 82nd floor…in which the Eiffel Tower is not visible.
2.The teacher suspected RAGHU because everyone is chatting and listening to the assembly…and why he is writing exam paper in the morning.
Disha S
June 15, 2021
Case 1: the writer might have had his lunch outside Paris where he cannot see the tower or might have gone to restaurant where there is no windows.
Case 2: the principle has suspected Raghu because he was writing his exam during morning assembly.
Case 3: Joseph has heard about the stranger’s behaviour by David hence he understood who that person was.
Case 4: Sidney Sheldon is a author who writes mostly crime fiction books….. Hence the will found inside that book might be the will related to the story of that book. Hence the inspector told those words
Case 5: the person who did the robbery is not an outsider because if he was an outsider who broke into the house the glass pieces would have been fallen more inside the house but the person who had done the robbery broke the glass from inside in order to make them suspect that it was a burgalar who broke into the house.
-Disha S
Vidya
June 15, 2021
1. Guy must be sitting on the Eiffel Tower itself or under the ground.
2. Raghu must be suspected as his statement doesn’t go with the scenario.
3. Don’t know.
4. Page 113 & 114 must be on the same page but on different side. So, it’s not possible to keep something between the latter mentioned pages.
5. The pieces of glasses were not more inside so, it means that the window must be broken from inside but not from outside.
Atharva Sinha
June 15, 2021
1) By facing the opposite side of the tower
2)Raghu.As it was the first day of the school and no school conduct exam on their first day.
Ishani Singh
June 15, 2021
Case 2 : The principal suspected Raghu because it was the first day of school and it is not possible to have exams on the first day of school.
Azima Sattani
June 15, 2021
1. He sat inside the Eiffel Tower and had his lunch hence he can’t see the Eiffel Tower.
2. Raghu might be the one who stole the Tution fees because while everyone was talking to their friends and reading newspapers he was the only one who said that he was writing the exams.
3.Joseph might be hanging out with Danial and Danial might have recognized him. Or, Joseph might have heard the stranger talking with Danial on phone/ in person hence Joseph knew that the stranger was Danials friend.
4. The will might be from the book.
5. Of the Burglary happend then the glass should be scattered inside the house but if someone from outside of house broke the window then the glass should be scattered inside.
(Sorry I am late ?)
Shagun Jangra
June 15, 2021
Wow this is asom activities
Anumitha
June 15, 2021
Case- 1: Probably sitting near the Eiffel Tower such a way that his back is facing the tower
Case-2: Raghu ( nobody writes an exam on the first day of school )
Case-3: He is David’s twin ( maybe)
Case-4: nil…..
Case-5: the policeman is right because when someone breaks a glass window from outside, all of glass pieces would fall inside the house… but only few pieces were inside
Helen Elizabeth Joseph
June 15, 2021
1. He had his lunch under the Eiffel tower.
2. It was Raghu who stole the money, it is the first day of school, how could he write an exam.
3. The stranger is David’s identical brother so Joseph recognised him.
4.
5. If the burglar entered from the outside of the window then there would be a lot of pieces of glass on the inside.
Hunar
June 15, 2021
Case.1 in a place apart from Paris.
Case.2 Debby, because the principle asked what were u doing at 8 am not at 8:10.
Case.3 he was wearing a name tag.
Case.5 the burglar couldn’t come from a tiny broken space in the window.
Krishna Kuril
June 15, 2021
Case 1:- The writer could have his lunch at his home or building which have walls surrounding so the tower
couldn’t be visible.
Case 2:- Raghu is telling lie, it was the first day of school, how was he writting exam paper.
Ameen Afsal
June 15, 2021
1. Under the eiffel tower.
2. Raghu because it was the first day of school and there will not be any exams.
3. Joesph was blind and he met his friend david.
4. Because sidney seldon did not have 113 and 114 pages.
5. If the peices of glass were shattered outside the house so it is clear that the window was broken inside the house.
Adyasha
June 15, 2021
Case 1 : The writer should have his lunch on top of the Eiffel Tower itself.
Case 2: Raghu is lying as no school would organise an exam on the first day of the school itself.
Case 5: if the burglar broke into the house then the glasses should hv scattered inside the house not outside.
?????? ??????
June 15, 2021
Ans1=case1….the writer can eat his lunch just down to the eiffel tower so the tower will behind him and he cannot see the tower .
Ans2=case2……raghu because on the first day of school there are no exams and secondly if he was writing exam so everyone should write the exams because exams are for everyone .
Ans3=case3…..because of his clothes or id card hanging on his neck or because someone called his name by his profession or he met him on the place he works.
Ans4=case4….because always the latest will are identified not the old ones.
Ans5=case5……because the parts of broken glasses outside of the house if we broke the glass from inside the parts will go outside and if we broke it from outside then it will come inside and the more parts of broken glass were outside so no one has enters in there house.
note…
bhavya shukla sorry for second one because I realli didnt know how to answers so now I did it.
Debarpan Roy
June 15, 2021
Case 1: Inside a closed room.
Case 2: Raghu, as at the first day of school how there could be any exam.
Case 3: By seeing ID card.
Case 4: As in every book at on side there is one even number which is smaller and on odd number which is larger than the even number. So, there is no middle portion between 113 and 114.
Case 5: The crack in the window which is too small for a person to enter through that. It had been done from hitting of a ball.
SAGAR B.S
June 15, 2021
1. Writer had his lunch in Restaurant .
2. Debby ; I was running late and reached School only at 8:10 am
3. Joseph is genius mind member. So, he understood who is he
4. WHY MEAMS THE PAPER WERE THE GOVERNMENT OFFICESO HE SAID TO PUT IT BACK
5.THE HUSBAND TOLD THE POLICEMAN THAT HE THINKS THAT THE BURGLAR PRESUMABLY ENTERED THE HOUSE BY BREAKING THROUGH THE WINDOW. So, THEY MADE POLICEMAN SO SURE
Niveditha Chowdary
June 15, 2021
Case 1 – I think the writer is sitting on the top of the eiffel tower , so that the writer can’t see the Eiffel tower .
Shamathmica G A
June 15, 2021
Answers
1) Writer had his lunch in Parachute
2) Raghu ( because he told he was writing exam paper but it was the first day of school )
3) He noticed that a stranger was also looking for someone
4) In book collection of Mr Bhosle he should find the books written by him but he found will in between Sidney Sheldon’s book
5) If the burglar came from outside the most pieces of glass should be inside the house but here most pieces of glass are outside the house so the burglar does not came from outside
Pranati
June 15, 2021
Case 1- In the Eiffel tower
Case 2- Raghu, because he can’t write the exam when the assembly is going on….
Case 4- The inspector said that as the pages 113 and 114 are on the same page and nothing can be kept between them..
Case 5- The policemen said that because if the burglar came inside by breaking the window then many broken glass pieces should be fallen inside the house near the window but there were only few…So the burglar did not come from outside..
Aasha
June 15, 2021
Case 1:Guy de Maupassant ate lunch everyday at the base of The Eiffel Tower, because that was the only place in Paris from which he could not see it .
Case 2: The principal suspected Raghu cause’ as Aarushi said she was reading the news in the morning assembly and Ron was chatting with his friends maybe in the morning assembly he was chatting and Debby said she was running late and arrived the school at 8:10 a.m. but whereas Raghu said he was writing exam paper during morning assembly while other student students are in the assembly.
Rithvikha
June 15, 2021
1. Below the tower.
2.Raghu, we never write exams on First day of school…
5.If window is broken from outside, most of the pieces would be fallen in and most could be seen outside.
M. Grace Elizabeth Victoria
June 15, 2021
Case 1: The artist must have shown his back to the Eiffel Tower or sit behind a wall and ate his lunch.
Case 2: The Principal must have suspected Raghu because it was just the first day, and he could not have written an exam.
Case 3: Joseph had heard about him from his friend so he must described about him.
Case 4: The page 114 and 114 are on the paper so he couldn’t have found between that.
Case 5: There was only a few a glass pieces on the inside of the house then probably there will many on the outside. So someone must have broke the window from inside.
M. Berwin
June 15, 2021
1. He ate his lunch behind a wall where the other side was facing the Eifel tower.
2. Raghu, because it was the first day of school, he cannot write an exam.
3. _________________________________________________
4. Because of the odd no. (i.e. 113) will be on the right side of a paper and even (i.e. 114) will be on the left side of the paper, hence both the pages will be on the same paper where there is no space between them.
5. If a burglar broke the window from the outside then most of the glasses will be inside, while here most of the glass pieces are outside.
Kushal
June 15, 2021
Case 1: The author would have had lunch at the Eiffel Tower’s base.
Case 2: Raghu because he was writing the exam paper on the first day of school.
Case 3: The stranger is David, because Joseph must be blind and didn’t see David when he introduced himself.
Case 4: It is the date Rishab found the will in terms of years
Case 5: The glass was shattered from the inside as the glass particles were found on the outside.
Ishani Singh
June 15, 2021
Case 2 : The principal suspected Raghu because on the first day of school how will you have exams when you haven’t even learnt anything?
Sreeparna Kamble
June 15, 2021
The case 2 answer is Raghu, because he was writting exam
Sayantika Ash
June 15, 2021
I am really like to solve this type of mystery thanks byju’s the learning app
Kamalika
June 15, 2021
Case 2 answer: Raghu was the boy suspected by the principle because on the first day of the school how can be a exam conducted and Raghu mentioned that he was writing a exam paper
Gargee Medhi
June 15, 2021
Case1- Bottom of the tower
Case2- arushi and Raghu
Case3- A stranger
Case4- Did you dismissal your uncle.
Case5- Some one threw a stone
Gargee Medhi
June 15, 2021
Case1- Bottom of the tower
Case2- arushi and Raghu
Case3- A stranger
Case4- Did you dismissal your uncle.
Case5- Some one threw a stone
Chhavi prajapatu
June 15, 2021
Case1-take lunch at room of building
Case2 principle suspect debby because all are present in school at 8am. But debby late
Case3 jopesh heard about stranger from her friend david do he understood who he was
Case4. Inspector diwaker and bolesh nephew are greed in bolesh money
Case5 I think policeman take side of robby
Shivani
June 15, 2021
Case. 5
The police man has seen some particles inside the house that meant the robbery was done by someone inside the house?
Amogh Kottada
June 15, 2021
Becuase there were tiny pices cattered??
Amogh Kottada
June 15, 2021
Case 4:
He said that becuase the page numbers he said were two sides of the same page
Sayantika Ash
June 15, 2021
1. Under the Eiffel tower.
2. Raghu, because there was no test in first day of school.
3. ???.
4. The nephew was telling lie because pg no.113 and 114 is either side of a single Page.
5. The husband said that he thinks that the burglar entered the house by breaking through the window, pointing to the broken window glasses on the outside of the house but the policeman noticed that only few tiny pieces of window glass particles where scattered around near the broken window area inside the house that makes the policeman so sure.
Anirud Chandran
June 15, 2021
Please post the answers
Mohammad Sadiq Ahamed
June 15, 2021
1: I can go and sit up on the tower and eat his lunch or face back to the tower and eat his lunch.
2: Raghu what the tuition fee theif because he was writing the exam paper early 8 o’clock.
3: Joseph understand it because stranger has come to the city and he don’t have any description so the stranger was David
4:the inspector said this because it was not his fortune it was Mr Bhosle ‘s fortune which was left for his children
5: the thing which made the policeman so sure because it was only some of the pieces of the broken glass window or scatter aur broken this made the policeman sure that no burglary and no outsider can enter the house
Anjusha yadav
June 15, 2021
Leave the comment
Amogh Kottada
June 15, 2021
The writer must have had his lunch in his apartment parking lot
Anjusha yadav
June 15, 2021
Good job
Kavya Sharma
June 15, 2021
1.under/below the Eiffel tower
2.Ron because if one in assembly and one in exam and one is late so Ron was chatting with whom?
Because there were only four friends so there is no-one remaining than Ron so he was lying.
3.He was a twin brother of one of Joseph’s friends.
5.When a window is broken from the outside by a thief, most of the glass will be found on the inside of the house, not on the outside of the house
,?????
Sakshi Jogdand
June 15, 2021
Answer of –
Case 1 – He had his lunch on the top of Eiffel Tower.
Case 2 – The principal suspected Raghu because he told that he was writing the exam paper but if there
was exam everyone would present there to write exam paper .
Case. 3 – Because the stranger introduced himself .
Case 4 – Inspector said that because page 113&114 are printed on same paper.
Case 5 -Only few tiny pieces of window glass particles were scatter around broken window. So, no
outsider can enter the house thought that window.
Nathan
June 15, 2021
Case 2
Raghul
Nathan
June 15, 2021
Case 1
He ate his lunch under the eiffel tower
harshita khichar
June 15, 2021
case 1. where he will not be able to see effile tower
case 2. raghu
case 3. because he has heard from his friend david
case 4. to be innocenet
case 5. because there were only few piece not more than that if there would be burglar so the whole window was broken
Bhagyashri Si
June 15, 2021
Answers of this mystery:
1. The writer will have his lunch at the bottom of the Eiffel Tower.
2. The principal will suspect Raghu because he was writing exam paper on the very first day of school.
3. The stranger was David himself and he used to boast about himself.
4. Pages 113 and 114 never comes face to face in a book.
5. If the burglar entered the house by breaking the windows, there should more glass pieces inside the house but there were only a few inside the house.
Hetika
June 15, 2021
For case 1, the answer is from Eiffel tower. Because we can not see Eiffel tower from Eiffel tower.
For case 2, the answer is Raghu because he was the only who wàs writting exam paper.
In case 3, Joseph’s friend told him about a habit of the stranger ,so when Joseph met him he knew who he was.
In case 4, because the novel does not have more than 20 pages.
In case 5, no outsider entered the house because if someone entered the house from outside and break the glass, the pieces of glass would be scattered inside the house.
Vaishanvi Dnyaneshwar Bodkhe
June 15, 2021
Case 2:- Raghu
Case 5:- because no one can enter through a window which only some pieces are scattered from such a small glass no one would enter . If burglar wanted to enter through window he would break whole window
Nehal Pohane
June 15, 2021
1 he had his lunch under the Eiffel tower
2 Raghu. Because how can he write exam paper at the time of assembly
3
4 because page numbers 113 and 114 are printed on the same paper.
5
Soha
June 15, 2021
Case 1: He ate it in the tower itself! That way the tower would not be visible!
Case 2: The principal suspected Raghu because it was the first day of school and there were no exams.
Case 3: The stranger was his friend David himself. They could’ve met online and David could’ve talked about himself.
Case 4: —
Case 5: If the robber actually broke through the window then there would have been much bigger pieces of glass lying inside the house as he would be coming from outside but there weren’t, all of the window shards were outside.
Viva
June 15, 2021
1. Under the tower
2. Raghu
3. –
4. There is no page between 113 and 114, they are back to back
5.If the burglar broke in, the glass would have been inside the house.
Amazing mysteries!??
V Srivatsha
June 15, 2021
1. May be he was sitting in a closed room
2.Raghu.Who else write the exam on the first day of the school?
3.May be he asked some questions about himself.
4.There is no space between 113 and 114.How can he find the paper?
5.When the bulgar broke the window from outside, most of the glass pieces should fall inside
Raj pawar
June 15, 2021
A. The writer have his lunch from home
B. Principal suspect Arushi because she tell I was reading the news paper in the assembly
C. Joseph know because his father knows
D.
E. Because only tiny pieces of windows glass particals were scattered around near the broken windows area inside house
Iha
June 15, 2021
1. Under the tower
2. Raghu
Alisha
June 15, 2021
Tanaya goswami mam , i really appreciate and love ur stories/ content .
Nehal Pohane
June 15, 2021
1 he had his lunch under the Eiffel tower.
2 Raghu. Because how can he write an exam at the time of assembly?
3
4 because the page numbers 113 and 114 are printed on the same paper
5
Nandana Malladad
June 15, 2021
Case 1:- He ate his lunch inside his house , where the tower was not visible.
Case2:- Raghu, because it was assembly time and how can only he can write exam while others were not.
Case 3:- Maybe the stranger would be a celebrity or politician
Case 4:- Mr, Bhosle haven’t even got his will paper from his lawyer on the day Roshan was saying . And it is proved that rishab was saying lie.
Case 5:- Because the hole was very small to enter from it as only tiny pieces of glass were scattered around it.
Aarush Pathak
June 15, 2021
For the second case principal suspected Raghu because all were doing daily assembly and chatting and other things but Raghu was doing exam but there was no exam
Mayukha Acharya
June 15, 2021
Case 1 – He would have had his lunch in the Eiffel tower as that is the only place where he won’t see it around him anywhere.
Case 2 – Raghu was the one who took the money because if he was writing the exam paper, so should everyone!
Case 3 – (I have no idea about the answer!)
Case 4 – It could have been someone else’s will or it could have been that in the court, they only accept the recent wills.
Case 5 – If the burglar had broken in the house, then just of the pieces should have fallen inside but in this situation, most of the pieces were outside the house which means something was thrown from inside the house to the outside.
Rohini Pandey
June 15, 2021
1. Under the Eiffel Tower
2. Raghu because no exams will be held on the first day of the school
3. Because of the stranger’s behavior about what David told to Joseph
4. I think that the nephew was telling this because of the greediness for the property and the inspector understood these things
5. Because no one can enter from the little space about which the husband was telling and there was just a Crack on the window
V.S. Arvinth
June 15, 2021
Good
Name Aysha kumari
June 15, 2021
Case one answer – from his home.
Case two answer – principal suspect Raghu because he is writting exam paper.
Case three answer – Joseph know who was he because he had heard about him.
Case four answer – diwakar say this because he is so busy in work.
Case five answer – when the policeman noticed some glass particles near the window that why the policeman is so sure.
Juwayriya
June 15, 2021
case 2
Raghu is the theif as it was the first day how can he write exam paper
Nehal Pohane
June 15, 2021
1 under the eiffel tower.
2 debby
3
4 because pages 113 and114 are printed on the same paper.
5 because if a person enters from the window then and the whole window glass should be scatterd around
Lekhashree
June 15, 2021
Case 2 answer Debby
Kirti
June 15, 2021
1. Behind the bushes
2. Raghu because it was the first day of school then how could he give an exam
3. Because it was David
4. Because in any book there is no 113 and 114 page no. side by side
5. Because if any one had came in then the majority of the glass pieces would be inside the house.
Pragnaya
June 15, 2021
I choose case 2: Raghu as everyone else were doing different things whereas Raghu was writing exam.
Meet Patel
June 15, 2021
Case 1 Ans. The writer had the lunch in Eiffel Tower’s restaurant.
Case 2 Ans. Raghu. As it is the first day of school then how was he writing the exam paper.
Case 3 Ans. The stranger was David.
Case 4 Ans. Because page no. 113 and 114 pages is two sided page which means one page at the backside so how did he got the paper between that two pages.
Case 5 Ans. The policeman was sure because if someone breaked the window from outside then the pieces of window would have fell more inside the house. But the pieces were very less inside the house.
Aastha Rai
June 15, 2021
Case 1- He had lunch on the Eiffel tower itself.
Case 2- Raghu was suspected because there can be no exam on the first day of school.
Case 3- He was the new boss of Joseph’s office
Case 4- He left the will on 20 April but the will show by Rishab was of 10 April
Case 5- The window was broken only a little, no person could enter through that hole. It was probably a small ball ??
Ruthvika
June 15, 2021
the answer are
Purbasha Falguni
June 15, 2021
Case 1 – He ate lunch at the base of Eiffel Tower
Case 2- on the first day of school, Raghu couldn’t be writing the exam.
Case 3- His doppelganger/ twin of one of his friends
Case 5- if the burglar came from the outside breaking the window, the glass should have shattered inside.
Tanmay
June 15, 2021
Case 1- The writer was on the top of The Eiffel Tower
Case 2 – The Principal suspected Raghu because It was the first day at school and how one can give exam on the first day.r
Case-3 –
Case-4 The Inspector said that because he suspected that Rishab might had heard about the will from Mr. Bhosle and Rishab might had stolen the will paper.
Case-5 – The Policeman was so sure because the broken window glass was too small for any person to pass through it.
Aditi Pillai
June 15, 2021
1) I think so the writer must have sat on the top of the Eiffel Tower
2) Raghu because on first day of the school there will be no exam
3) The stranger must be David’s twin brother.
4) The inspector said this to Rishab because in a book there cannot be pages 113 and 114 side by side?
5) The glass pieces were more outside than inside.
Krishaa Furia
June 15, 2021
Case 1 – under the tower
Case 2 – Raghu because it was the first day of school and how will did he write the exam
Neelakshi
June 15, 2021
Raghu has take tution fee because Raghu is writing exam paper before assembly that why he lie
Abhinaya
June 15, 2021
Case 2= principal suspect Raghu because on the first day of school don’t have any exams .
Case 5= because the husband pointing to the broken window glasses on the outside of house and police noticed that only few tiny peace of window glass particles are scattered around near the broken window area inside the house it means no one come inside. Some one of inside gone outside.
Omkar
June 15, 2021
I love this all
Abishek
June 15, 2021
Case 2
Raghu , because no exam will be kept on the first day of the school…..
Souvik Barik
June 15, 2021
1. Under the Eiffel Tower
2. Ron. Whom he was chatting with, when the others were either reading news, writing exam paper or was late and not present?
3.
4. No book contains page 113&114 together. The left page will be an even number and the right page an odd number (one more than the even number)
5. If the burglar breaks the window from outside, then most of the broken glass pieces would have fallen inside.
Trisha
June 15, 2021
Case 1 : The poet had his lunch under the Eiffel Tower, as the tower would not be visible when someone stands/sits under it.
Case 2 : Raghu was the one suspected because 8am is the time when school starts and how can somebody write an exam paper at that time. if there was an exam everybody would have been busy writing the paper.
Case 3 : Joseph might have seen the photograph of the stranger from david.
Case 4 : the inspector said so because there are no pages between 113 and 114 in a book. 113 and 114 are two sides of the same page. thus no possibility of finding a letter between them.
Case 5 : the policeman was sure because he saw only some tiny pieces of glass inside the house which indicates the hole made in the window was small and not enough for an outsider to get inside.
Rashi Mistry
June 15, 2021
CASE 2
The answer for the case 2 is Raghu.It is him as it was the first day of school and as all of us know that on the first day of school there won’t be any exam or test in the class then how was Raghu writing the exam paper, so it surely him.
CASE 5
The police knew this because the tiny glass pieces were outside the house and if any burglar ever broke in, then the glass pieces should be inside the house and not outside because that person threw something hard from outside and hence the glass pieces should be in.
Taha Husain
June 15, 2021
The answer of Question 3 is: That the stranger told his name just after meeting Joseph or he had a Identity Card visible
The Answer of Question 4 is: Because the writer wouldn’t hide very important thing in a book or the will would be really old
The answer of Question 5 is: That there was no burglary happened there because the glass pieces were outside the house, So if the burglar came from the outside to inside than the glass pieces would be inside not outside
Ankush
June 15, 2021
Don’t know
Siddhi Sharma
June 15, 2021
Case2: Raghu… because he was writing exam and as it was the new session….
Taha Husain
June 15, 2021
The answer of Question 2 is: That the thief is ‘Raghu’ because students cannot write exam papers
Lily
June 15, 2021
1. He sat on the top of the tower
2. Raghu
4. Because we can’t put anything between page 113 and 114 because they are two sides of the pages.
5.because the hole was tiny and
Mirrors should be scattered far because it was broken by an outsider.
Niyati
June 15, 2021
1)Inside house or a closed room
2)Raghu, how could he give exam during assembly!
3) might be he understood he was a stranger as he was not familiar with him or he would have seen a pic of his friend David with him with which he understood that the person was the one whom david talked about
4) Because the will was older than that of the will written on 20 April and so the 20 April will had more importance.
5)It was as if someone would have entered the house through that window then there shall be many glass particles inside as the person would has broken the window from outside moving hand or tool inside. And as the particles were more outside, someone broke the window from inside.
Taha Husain
June 15, 2021
The Answer of question 1 is: He ate his lunch in an underground subway
Prerna kuyate
June 15, 2021
1. Underground or under the Eiffel tower
2. Raghu, because at The time of assembly how can he write the exam.
4. Mr. Divakar said that because page no. 113 & 114 lie on same page on different opposite side. So, it is impossible for anyone to keep anything between them.
Antara santra
June 15, 2021
Answers:-
1) the writer was having lunch sitting in the space below the tower…
2) Raghu, because if there were exam then all the students will give exam…not only one so among those only he was giving exam.
3) when he will ask to the stranger that is David ur friend then if he tells yes then he can understand as David was the friend of both Joseph and the stranger.
4) because the inspector knows the truth which Rishab don’t know by claiming he only will get arrested…
5) because the police man knew that no person can enter through a small hole in the window.
Ranjana Kumari
June 15, 2021
Excellent ???
Nandini Ray
June 15, 2021
Case 1:- On Eiffel tower
Case 2:- Principal suspected to Raghu because Raghu said he was writing exam paper but that’s first day of school.
Case 3:-He was a twin brother of one of Joseph’s friends.
Case 4:- Inspector told that because page 113 is in right side of any book and 114 in left side of next page of any book so , how the paper is between the page 113 and 114 by this prove that Rishabh saying lie.
Case 5:- Policeman makes sure that any outsider not come in the home because the most of the glass are inside the house, if thief will come most of the glass will be outside the house.
AARADHYA AGARWAL
June 15, 2021
CASE 2 RAGHU
K.N.Hema shri
June 15, 2021
Case 2:Debby
Arna Somya
June 15, 2021
1. The French writer did his lunch on the topmost of the Eiffel Tower.
2. The principal suspected Raghu because it was the first day of school and no school have their exams on the first day. So the culprit is Raghu
3. Joseph understood that he was the right person because that person was searching for a job. And David must have told him about Joseph. Or maybe that person came to meet Joseph with David.
4. The inspector said so because Sidney Sheldon is an American writer not a name of book. Also Rishab said that he was going through his uncle’s book collection then how Sidney Sheldon came.
5. The policeman was so sure because if the burglar broke into the house through breaking the windows, the windows must have made some noise and if there was some noise the person can be alert enough to check on it.
Love BYJU’S….. please share more of these. I love spy related things…
Thank u for making me an “AGENT”.??♀️??♀️??
Arna Somya
June 15, 2021
1. The French writer did his lunch on the topmost of the Eiffel Tower.
2. The principal suspected Raghu because it was the first day of school and no school have their exams on the first day.
3. Joseph understood that he was the right person because that person was searching for a job. And David must have told him about Joseph. Or maybe that person came to meet Joseph with David.
4. The inspector said so because Sidney Sheldon is an American writer not a name of book. Also Rishab said that he was going through his uncle’s book collection then how Sidney Sheldon came.
5. The policeman was so sure because if the burglar broke into the house through breaking the windows, the windows must have made some noise and if there was some noise the person can be alert enough to check on it.
Love BYJU’S….. please share more of these. I love spy related things…
Thank u for making me an “AGENT”.??♀️??♀️??
Dhanyatha
June 15, 2021
1 . He ate it while showing his back to the tower
2 . Raghu as there will be no exams on 1st day
3. The stranger comes forward for a handshake / tells him his name
4. There is no Pg no 113 in book
5. There were no glass pieces inside the home .
Vaaruni
June 15, 2021
1. In a plane or in any other country
2. On raghu becoz it can be recognized as a lie
3. Becoz his friend David had told everything
4. The hole of the window was very small
Rashmika sai
June 15, 2021
1 mystery answer : the man was seated on the Eiffel Tower to have his lunch .
Dhiya George
June 15, 2021
1. Guy de Maupassant ate his lunch in the Eiffel Tower restaurant
2. Raghu it was the first day to school and no exams then
3. Joseph and the stanger looked alike
5. The police men understood that the acussed was inside the house because the broken glass was outside and is broken by someone inside.
M.S.Madhumitha
June 15, 2021
Case 1 under the Eiffel tower
Case 2 Debby
Case 3 he saw the name
Case 4 it can be of the book
Case 5 bcoz the window is having a small broken area
Anvita
June 15, 2021
The thing which made the policeman so sure was that the window was broken from inside that’s why there were very few pieces of the window glass
Saanvi Singh
June 15, 2021
Ans. of case 1- the writer could be in any other city of France
Ans. of case 2- Raghu as there won’t be an exam on the first day of school
Shubham kumar
June 15, 2021
THANKU
Shubham kumar
June 15, 2021
5:POLICEMAN MAD FIR SO SURE
4:l FOUND BOOK PAPPER COLLECTION IN BETWEEN PAGE 113 OR 114 OF SIDNEY SHELDON
3:NEITHER WAS THE STRANGER RELATE TO JOSEPH NOR WAS HE FAMOUS
2:RAGHU IS TAKE HER TUITION FEE
1:l CAN’T UNDERSTOOD CASE 1 SORRY
Arya Nair
June 15, 2021
Case 1 : The writer must have had his lunch under the
Eiffel Tower so that he could not see the tower.
Case 2 :It might be Raghu who lied because he told that he was writing the exam paper. It was the first day of school and the exam on the first day of school…?
That is sus.
Case 3 : Maybe the stranger might be the identical twin of David. So he doesn’t want any description about his appearance as he looks like David.
Case 4 : I couldn’t able to find the reason.Sorry.
Case 5 : It’s because if the window had been broken from outside, most of the glass pieces should be seen inside of the house. But there were only few pieces which shows that it might broke by someone from inside.
Hope these answers are helpful!!
And Thank You these riddles.
Vaibhavi yadav
June 15, 2021
I think in case2
Raghu was suspect as others are doing another thing but only he was writing the exam paper
Noraiz Sutar
June 15, 2021
5=Because no-one can enter from the window from such a small hole
Nandika
June 15, 2021
Hey Byjus,
Just cracked all the 5 mysteries.
It was so much fun
Noraiz Sutar
June 15, 2021
4=Because it was not Rishab’s.
Rishideb Biswas
June 15, 2021
1)He was at his home.
2)Raghu,why he was writing the exam paper ?
3)Joseph knew the stranger’s name so he asked him and recognised him.
4)There is no gap between page 113 & 114, it is a single page.
5)There must be glass pieces inside the house rather than the outside.
Noraiz Sutar
June 15, 2021
3= he was David only.
Veerashri Bhosale.
June 15, 2021
1.)He had his lunch inside his house with all the doors and windows closed.
2.)Raghu is the suspect, how can he write exam during the assembly and that too on the first day of school…
3.)David did not tell Joseph about the stranger’s appearance , David must have shown Joseph the stranger’s photo.
4.)113 and 114 are the page numbers of the same page on its either sides.
5.)The window had a small hole and no one could enter through it, as there were only a few broken glass on the floor.
Parinita Chachra
June 15, 2021
case 1 – He had his lunch sitting at the base of the tower.
case 2 – Raghu, as it was assembly time and he lied that he was writing his exam.
case 3 -He could be a twin brother of one of his known friend.
case 4 – Because 113 & 114 page of a book are printed at the back of each other.
case 5 – Because the glass pieces were outside as if somone has broken from inside. as if a window glass is broken from outside the pieces should have fallen inside.
Noraiz Sutar
June 15, 2021
2=if there are exams then why didn’t all the students wrote it so Raghu stoke her money
Abhigyan Taran
June 15, 2021
1. He kept the window closed.
2. Debby, if she arrived at 8:10, she wouldn’t have been here at 8 am.
Asmi Badwelkar
June 15, 2021
I have solved case 2
The Principal will suspect Raghu because he was writing the exam paper and how can he do that if it’s the first day of school.
Rupali
June 15, 2021
Ans 1)If the writer sits under the Eiffel Tower, he cannot see the tower.
Ans 2)It was the first day of school so how was Raghu writing the exam. It means Raghu has stolen Tina’s tuition fee.
Ans 3)When Joseph heard about the man from his friend David, he recognized his expression.
Ans 4)Because at the bottom of every will it is written that any will before this will will not be valid.
Ans 5)Because the glass was broken from inside, it means that someone from inside the house broke the glass.
Katikaneni Anuj kishan
June 15, 2021
1. At the base of Eiffel Tower
2.raghu
3.he is a twin brother of his friend David
4.pg 113 and 114 do not exist side by side but rather on different sides of a same page in any book
5. If an outsider has broken in through the window there would have been more shards of glass inside the house. And not outside the house. Which means the husband or the wife have probably broken it from the inside
Nandika
June 15, 2021
Thank you
Will note down the answers and check them today in your show.
Regards,
Nandika
Amatullah
June 15, 2021
Case 2
Principal suspected Raghu because there are no exams on your first day of school .
Then how can Raghu give an exam on first day onwards.
So,the Raghu should be suspected.
Aishwarya Sinha
June 15, 2021
I think 2 no ans is Raghu .. Because it’s not a exam time if it is a exam time then everyone is giving the exam only…. Mam don’t think my father is giving the ans …. Mam I thought it.. Mam is it correct answer ?
Noraiz Sutar
June 15, 2021
1=he had his lunch on the eiffile tower
PARINITHA.T
June 15, 2021
Answers:
1.He had his lunch in a Restauarant located in the Eiffel Tower
2.Ron because each one of his friends were doing their works and there is no one to chat with Ron
3.Joseph knew almost everyone in his locality .So, when he met the stranger he recognized him immediately
4.Inspector asked him to keep the Will back because Rishab mentioned that his uncle revised the Will on 10th April . If his uncle revised the Will ten days before his dismissal he can give the revised Will to his three children on 20th April
5.The policeman was so sure because the broken piece of the window was very small in which small animals like cat can only fit into it but a human being can’t
Soumya Singh
June 15, 2021
Case 1 : Guy de maupassant ate his lunch at the base of the Eiffel
Tower.
Case 2 : The Principal suspected Raghu as he was lying by saying
that he was writing the exam paper ON THE FIRST DAY OF
THE SCHOOL.
Case 3 : It is written that at the moment Joseph, met him he knew
who HE was? The ‘he’ capitalized in here was to denote
JOSEPH HIMSELF.
Case 4 : The inspector got to know that Rishab was lying as he said
that he found the will between the pages of 113 and 114 of
SIDNEY SHELDON. ‘Sidney Sheldon’ is not a book’s name it
is a writer’s name.
Case 5 : The policeman was so sure because only few tiny pieces of
the broken glass were fallen inside, if someone would have
broken the glass from the outside big peices of glass would
have been fallen inside.
M NITHISH PANDI
June 15, 2021
Case 2 Answer Raghu because in the first day school there will be no exams
Anumegha Das
June 15, 2021
1. In a restaurant at the base of the tower
2. Raghu, as it was the first day of school and exams are not held that day.
3. The stranger was a twin brother of one of David’s friends.
4. If it was revised on 10th, then he wouldn’t have found it a week ago.
5. He said so, because, if at all the house had been broken in from the outside, the shattered glass would be larger in size and number.
Rishideb Biswas
June 15, 2021
These riddles are very very very very easy to crack .
Rishideb Biswas
June 15, 2021
I have cracked all the riddles .
Mayoogha shaji
June 15, 2021
Joseph don’t no he is the stranger
Case 3
Sheetal Shukla
June 15, 2021
1) In the restaurant near it.
2) Raghu : as there is no exam on first day of school
3)there was a name batch / tag on his shirt
4) it was a page of a book
5) if a man would enter the glass pieces should have been big …
Princess
June 15, 2021
Case 2 principal suspect Raghu because 1 day of school and he is write the exam paper
Madan kumar
June 15, 2021
Case no.1 -writter launch in after making effel tower
Case no.2-raghu and debby is suspect of principal because Raghu was writting exam paper but not in exam and debby is late to come in school
Case no.3- joshep meet this stranger was brother of joshep david
Case no.4-mr bhosle meet this stranger was is theif
Priyanshi Singh
June 15, 2021
Case 1:- The artist ate his lunch at the base of the Eiffel tower to avoid the skyline.
Case 2:- Raghu, because if everyone was attending the assembly why would he write a exam? It means he was lying.
Case 3:- The stranger was David’s twin brother.
Case 4:- In the book Sidney Sheldon the pages 113 and 114 lie on the same sheet so it is impossible to put the will between them which means Rishab is lying.
Case 5:- There was no burglary because the broken pieces of glass where fallen outside the house in the lawn and if it would have been a real burglary the pieces would have fallen inside the house as the burgalar would come from outside the house and not from inside.
Hope all my answers are correct!!
Loved the cases!!
Hriddhiman Debnath
June 15, 2021
Case 1-At the Eiffel Tower
Case 2-Ron
Case 3-Because he asked the person his
name
Case 4-……………
Case 5-Because the hole in the window was
Very small to be entered by a person
And the husband had thrown the
stone from outside to confuse the
inspector
Avichal Mishra
June 15, 2021
1 in his house
2 Raghu , exam will be for whole class then how was he alone writing exam paper
3 He might be the only one standing in the place where the were meeting
4 It might be some one else’s will
5 The peices were outside the house which means that someone broke the window from inside
Aditya kanyal
June 15, 2021
Answer 1- Under the Eiffel Tower.
Answer 2- Principal suspected Raghu because no exam was going on that day.
Answer 3- Joseph understood about that stranger because his friend David just told him about that person.
Answer 4- The inspector said that because Rishab had produced a new will in the court claiming that his uncle left his fortune for him.
Answer 5- If we will apply force from inside of the house then only more pieces of glass will be read more on outside the house. This made inspector so sure.
M.R.Krishni
June 15, 2021
Case 1: on top of the Eiffel tower
Case 2: Raghu
Case 3:
Case 4: page 113 and 114 consist of a single paper. They are on different sides of a single paper. Page 113
comes on right side and page 114 comes on the left.
Case 5 : there were only a few tiny particles of glass scattered around near the broken window inside the
house. There was a small hole through which a person can’t come in.
Veer Patel
June 15, 2021
Case 2 – Raghu. First day of school there is no exam.
Case 1 – At home. During lunch his eyes on lunch.
Case – 3 Strange person was David.
Case – 4 Nephew is interested in will. Why he has to remember pages of book. So is wrong.
Case 5 – as reported by husband the broken glass was outside of window but policeman noticed glass are inside the house so not entered from outside.
Ryan Toms
June 15, 2021
1-His House
2-Ron,as he couldn’t be chatting with his friends because they were doing something else.
3-David told him his name
4-He told to put it back as it was Sidney Sheldon’s will.
5-The broken part was too small for someone to fit through.
Ronaq
June 15, 2021
Case 1
on the the tower
Anish Mondal
June 15, 2021
In case 1the writer must have eaten his lunch outside the city because the Eiffel Tower is seen from anywhere of the city.
R. Mohnish
June 15, 2021
1.The famous writer eat the lunch in air baloon. The air baloon wants to fly up of the eiffel tower.
2.The principal suspected the ron because all the friends are busy so to whom the ron chat.
3.The joseph found his apperance because the stranger was famous.
4.The inspecter asked that question because the will is mysteries.
5.The policeman was so sure in the thief come in the house.
Gopal
June 15, 2021
3 class
Ved sharma
June 15, 2021
I only case 2 answer it’s Arushi . How could you read news in an assembly
Sanjaya Behera
June 15, 2021
1n answer – The writer have his lunch from a place where the tower was not visible.
2n answer – The principal suspect Debby because he reached school only 8:10 am.
3n answer- Joseph heard about him from his friend David so he under stood who he was .
4n answer – The inspector realise that rishab tell something wrong.
5n answer – The broken window glasses on the outside of the house made the policeman so sure.
Bhanypriya
June 15, 2021
Case 2.Ron, because phone is not allowed in school
Brahmananda dalai
June 15, 2021
It is a very nice learning app
Ruchira
June 15, 2021
Case 1- on the Eiffel tower itself.
Case 2 – it was Raghu, since no exam will be held in 1st day.
Case 3- the stranger is David’s identical twin brother.
Case 4- there are no pages 113 and 114 in that book.
Case 5- the broken area of the window was too small for a man to enter.
Siya
June 15, 2021
1. He has to travel Asia.
Avinash.L
June 15, 2021
1. Effiel tower
2.Raghu
3.don’t
4.don’t
5.because of the small whole in window.
Gargi
June 15, 2021
In case 2 Raghu is telling lie because on the first day of the school there was not any exam but if that day the exam was done so why only Rahul attend the exam why another student like Ron , Austin and Debby done ✔ the exam .
Shiva Chauhan
June 15, 2021
1. Writer can have his lunch under the Eiffel tower.
2. Principal suspected Raghu as how can there be any exam on the very first day of the school.
3. Because the stranger was the Joseph’s boss.
4. Two days ago from April 20, i.e., on April 18, Rishab had shown the will and a week ago he had found it but at that time Mr. Bhonsle was alive.
Rayhan Muhammed Shamseer
June 15, 2021
Answers
1. The Man ate lunch under the Eiffel Tower
2. The Principal suspected Raghu because there is no Exam in the first day of school
3. Maybe Joseph is the one that’s famous and the stranger went to him and told about himself
4. The Inspector told those words because Page 13 & 14 are opposite to each other on the same page
5. Because if the Bulgrar threw a stone at the house the glass shards would be inside the house not outside. This means that the couple planned this and they threw the stone.
Aakarsh Tripathi
June 15, 2021
In first case writer ate lunch in tower’s restaurant.
In second case principal suspected Raghu.
In third case the stranger was his friend David’s brother.
In fourth case Rishab was lying because he came to tell this two days after 20 April and found genuine in a book.
In fifth case the officer told that no outsider has come through that window because only a little of window was broken and only little pieces of glass was on the flour.
Khushnuma
June 15, 2021
Answer
1. Writer have his Lunch under the Eiffel tower
2. Maybe, Raghu
3.strranger tell Joseph about himself
4. Inspector say this because between of page 113 and 114 can’t possible
5. Police man so sure because if any burglary intered in home so the glass patricles scratterd inside the home but doesn’t happened
Anna Susan Ajay
June 15, 2021
Case 5
A outsider can’t get through a small place in a window because if a outsider is big than that small space saw some kid had thrown a stone by mistake
Shreeya Basavaraj Patil
June 15, 2021
Case 2- Raghu will suspected because he told that he was writing exam papers and if is there any exam then all of them have to attend that exam.
Case 1- In French.
Case 4- Policeman was so sure because he knows that if the burglary entered in the house from breaking the window then the pieces of glasses have to inside the house but the pieces of glass are outside the house.
Alwin
June 15, 2021
Case1:Basement/Inside the Eiffel Tower itself
Case2:Raghu as students don’t write exam in the first day of school
Case3:Sibling if David/Doppelgängers
Case4:Mr.Bholse may not be interested in crime and thriller novels such as Sidney Sheldon
Case5:if the glass was broken from outside the house large and more glass peices would be found inside the house.
Anushka
June 15, 2021
1) Writer can have lunch outside the city.
2) Raghu – Reason (No examination is during assembly)
3) Because he was David’s friend.
4) He has written the will by himself.
5) If robber had thrown the stone towards windows all pieces would fall inside the house.
ANIRUDH KUMAR SINHA
June 15, 2021
1) Writer can have lunch outside the city.
2) Raghu – Reason (No examination is during assembly)
3) Because he was David’s friend.
4) He has written the will by himself.
5) If robber had thrown the stone towards windows all pieces would fall inside the house.
Aaren pinto
June 15, 2021
1.The writer was sitting below the eiffel tower
2.The principal suspected raghu because he lied about the test
3.David told the stranger how Joseph looks and he met Joseph
4.The inspector said that because if rishab found it 1 week ago why did he not show it before
5.The hole was too small for a burglar to fit that mad the policeman so sure
Fathima hazeeb
June 15, 2021
1:he had the lunch on top of the Eiffel Tower.
2:the one who stole the money is Raghu because there is no exam on the first day of school
3:because he was the stranger
4:Sidney sheldon is the name of an author not a book
5: because the broken window were on the outside .
Nisha R Nair
June 15, 2021
Case 2:
The principal suspected Raghu,because it was the first day of the school,so there can’t be any exam on the first day itself.
ADITRI KOLEY
June 15, 2021
case 1: He goes to his house and closed his house windows and doors and have lunch .
case 2: The principal can suspect Raghu because he told he was writing exam but no other student was writing exam .
case 3: The stranger who meet Joseph is David’s twin brother.
case 4: Inspector Diwaker said it to keep back because 113 and 114 are opposite side of a single sheet
case 5: The police man became sure because there were very tine pieces of glass and no burglar can pass through such a small hole
Ansh Kumar Shah
June 15, 2021
1. Because he had his lunch in a building with no windows.
2. Raghu , because Arushi said that she was reading the news in the morning assembly but Raghu said that he was writing the exam paper.
3. –
4. –
5. The inspector said this because he saw scattered pieces of glass are laying outside and if some one came in his house through the windows the pieces should be laying inside the house.
Akshat Aryan
June 15, 2021
1) At the 82nd floor or above it.
3) He understood who he was because he had now seen him.
5) If the theif had entered the house through the window from outside, the broken glass would have been scattered inside the house. But the broken glass was scattered outside the house. So, someone must have broken the window from within the house.
swastik das
June 14, 2021
1)under the eiffel tower
2)Raghu
3)twin brother of Joseph ‘s friend
4)because the most recent one will be valid
5)when a window is broken from outside, most of the glass will be found inside the house.
Savarnnaa Jena
June 14, 2021
1 – Top of the Eiffel tower.
2 – Raghu because in the first day nobody gives exam paper.
3 – David has disgusted himself.
4 – Because it was a fake one.
5 – Because nobody could get through into such a hole broken area.
Please BYJUS make me the 1st or
2nd or 3rd… Send me my gift too …
Savarnnaa
Dhanushree
June 14, 2021
Case 5
The police made sure that there wasn’t any robbery that took place because there were only few pieces of scattered window .
Fathimathul Zahra Thabriz
June 14, 2021
1.
2.
3.coz its David himself
4.because he knew
5.coz..only few pieces of glass were broken
Navneet Tiwari
June 14, 2021
1. Out of Paris
2. The principal suspected Debby because he had steal the money. That’s why he was late.
3. Because he was with his friend David. He told that this stranger is the man he was talking about.
4. Because the newphew was a frauder.
5. Because such a few space is not possible for a man to enter in his house.
Dhanushree
June 14, 2021
Case 2
Raghu was the suspect because there isn’t any exam paper given on the first day of school
Techno
June 14, 2021
I think its the husband in the fifth case
Sharon dsouza
June 14, 2021
In the case 2 the suspect is raghu because it’s the first day of school and he was writing an exam
Sanaya
June 14, 2021
Answer for case 1- the artist ate his lunch at the Eiffel Tower itself as from the Eiffel Tower, the tower itself is not visible
Answer for case 2- Raghu is lying as he said that he was writing his exam paper but it was the first day of school so there was no exam, and he is lying
Answer for case 4- He said that because he found out Rishab was lying as pages 113 and 114 are the two sides of the same page, there is no way a will can be placed between those pages
Answer for case 5-
As the broken glass particles were outside the house, and there were lesser pieces inside. If an outsider would have entered the house he would have broken the window and most of the glass pieces would be inside the house, but in this case since there were more outside and very few inside, it means someone had broken the window from the inside of the house to go outside
Sharon dsouza
June 14, 2021
In the first mystery he had his lunch where he couldn’t see the Eiffel tower
Rupali
June 14, 2021
Ans 1)If the writer sits under the Eiffel Tower, he will not see the tower.
Ans 2)It was the first day of school so how was Raghu writing the exam. It means Raghu stole Tina’s tuition fee.
Ans 3)Joseph’s friend David must have told Joseph the attitude of the man that he is like that, so Joseph recognized the man.
Ans 4)Because at the end of every will it is written that any will before this will is not valid.
Ans 5)Because the glass was broken from inside, which was broken by someone from inside the house.
Avni Goenka
June 14, 2021
1.He moved out of Paris.
2.Ron as all his friends were busy then he was talking with whom !
3.From the things he heard from his friend,David.
4.The note can’t be in the pages between 113-114.It is not possible.
5.The policeman said that as a person could not pass through a small break in the glass window.
VIBHI GUPTA
June 14, 2021
Case 1: Under Eiffel tower since it can’t be seen from in there.
Case 2: Raghu was suspected as no school conducts an exam on the first day of school.
Case 3: He was David’s twin brother.
Case 4: He said so since there can’t be a page between two consecutive pages 113 and 114 as mentioned in the puzzle. Therefore, nephew’s lying.
Case 5: If an outsider enters by breaking the window, the major amount of glass pieces have to be scattered inside the house but it’s the opposite in the case and so policeman confirms that there was no person entering the home through the window.
Gurleen kaur
June 14, 2021
1. He had his lunch from an underground restaurant.
2. Raghu, bcz there is no exam on first day of school.
3. He might have guessed him by his body language or Joseph had introduced himself at the time he met him.
4. Because pages 113 and 114 never come collectively…they come like 113 page and we have to turn page to get 114 page…so he was lying that he had found Will between page 113 and 115
5. Because if someone had broken window to come inside then broken pieces would be outside the house and if a human has entered through it then there would be lot of pieces of broken glass.
Shivashrit Sahu
June 14, 2021
Case:1
Ans: Guy de Mupassant have the lunch at the Eiffel tower’s restaurant,from there he cannot see the tower.
Case:2
Ans: Principal suspect Raghu because all the three students are outside of the classroom or exam hall.So how Raghu will give the exam.
Rutu Ravindra Rakate
June 14, 2021
Case 1
Don’t know
Case 2
Its raghu because if everyone was free how come only he had an exam his statement is fake.
Case 3
By his appearance
Case 4
Inspector said this because there is no number between 113 and 114 so it’s fake.
Case 5
There were tiny pieces no human can pass through a small hole.
Ritisha Ranjan
June 14, 2021
In case 1 I guess it would be better for the French writer sit sit under the tree and eat lunch in the way where that tree covers up his head or it would be more convenient for him to eat his lunch at his home.
In case 2 the principal must have suspected to Debby as he was running late and reached home at 8:10 and the money was lost at 8 then what must be the reason for him being late maybe he was thefting her money and thus he got home late.
In case 3 as the statement says that Joseph’s friend David told him about his friend before meeting him. Joseph could have been figured him out with the help of David’s words for his friend.
In case 5 the burglar must have broken the window for unlocking purpose or some uncovering purpose of certain thing it can be a lock or such many things.
Arunima jyoti
June 14, 2021
1. The writer Guy de Maupassant had his lunch on the top of the Eiffel tower.
2. The principal suspected on Raghu as Raghu was writing his exam while others not which means that he is making an excuse.
3. The stranger was his friend David
4. The inspector told so to Rishab because if he says that the his uncle told him about the wiil then, he also says that the writer (uncle) has recited the will 10 days before his dismissal the how. He says that he found it two days before his dismissal.
5. The policeman was sure that it was not a burglary as the hole was so small that no one can go through it. So, the policeman thought that the couple was faking it
Shreya
June 14, 2021
In first case the answer is
Ans : The French Writer ate lunch in the tower restaurant.. Because that was the only place from where the Eiffel Tower was not seen …
Radhika Sheetal
June 14, 2021
1.I think that he had lunch at his house which must have been Isolated with many big building around it, hence reducing the possibility of being able to watch the tower.
2. I think the suspect here is clearly Ron as he is new so how come he could have talked with his friends, even though it’s possible but the school starts at 8 so how quickly could he had made new friends.
3. He must have once saw that person or it could be that they were supposed to meet at a specific place at a specific time.
4. Cause the will that said the the money was left behind for his kids was written way after the first one which ensures that the first will is no longer valid.
5.the police man was sure as the hole in the window was so small a entire human body couldn’t have gone through it.
Nysa Kashyap
June 14, 2021
Case1 = he ate lunch at the top of the eiffil tower
Case2 = It was Raghu because he can’t write exam on first day of school.
Case3 = because Joseph wasn’t famous but the stranger was.
Case4 = because 114 page should be behind 113.
Case5 = because if someone break the window from outside then the particals of glass should be outside.
Mehek Mansuri
June 14, 2021
Answers:
Q1. Guy de Maupassant had ate his lunch in the tower’s restaurant every day because it was the one & only place in Paris where the tower was not visible.
Q2.The principal suspected Raghu because at 8:10 am the exam cannot be conducted as there was morning assembly.
Q3.By the sense of style.
Q4.Because Sidney Sheldon is a writer not a book!
Q5.Because in that much amount of broken glass the burglar wouldn’t have been able to get inside or outside.
Saswati Supriya Sahoo
June 14, 2021
1. Near the Eiffel tower…. Because if he is near the tower he would able to see the surrounding areas not the the tower standing up….
2. I think the correct answer is the third friend… Because how can a single person give the exam if the first one was chatting, the second one was reading the news in the morning assembly and the fourth one who was running late and reached school by 8: 10 . As it is mentioned they were of the same class because the person whose money was lost was the friend of these four…
3. I think he he was the friend of both Joseph and David so he recognised their friend….
4.
5. He was sure because it was only a small portion of the window that was broken and how would such a large person would get inside that tiny broken part….. That could be broken by any ball or something else….
Eisha
June 14, 2021
Case 2: Raghu, it’s the first day of school, why would he have to write an exam?
Eisha
June 14, 2021
Case 1: under the eiffel tower
Paavanpreet gaur
June 14, 2021
CASE 1
Mr. Maupassant was sitting below the tree and having his lunch , cause of tree leaves he can’t see the Eiffel Tower
CASE 2
Ron stolen Tina’s tuition fee, at the time of school assembly how can he chatted with friends
CASE 3
Joseph knew about stranger because appointment was fixed
CASE 4
Inspector says that because page no. 114 just behind to page no. 113
CASE5
Police man make sure because the glass pieces not inside the house, it mean glass was broken from inside of house
ALL CASE SOLVED
VAIBHAVI SINHA
June 14, 2021
Case-1: Because he ate the lunch inside the Eiffel tower that’s why he can’t see the Eiffel tower.
Case-2: Raghav, because it was the first day of school and there is no exam.
Case-3: Because the David told the Joseph the profession of the stranger
Case-4:Rishab was telling lie because there is no pages with odd number before and even number after.
Case-5:The police man knew that the couple lied because if it was broke by outside then the broken window glasses should be more inside than outside.
YATHIN DEEPAK
June 14, 2021
1. The writer was sitting at the top of the Eiffel Tower.
2. The principal suspected Raghu. Because he can’t write exam on the first day of the school.
3. Joseph recognised him.because he was David himself.
4. The will his nephew found was written by the writer of that book.
5. The police man told the husband, because the thief was the husband.
Saumya Mehrotra
June 14, 2021
1. The writer can have lunch at the top of the Eiffel tower.
2.Ron
3.By having a physical conversation with him and understanding each other better .
4.Sidney Sheldon is a writer
It’s not a book. Ridhab must be lying
5.If someone entered house from outside, the window must be broken a lot but instead, there were only tiny scattered glass particles around window inside the house . Hence policemen understood that the couple was lying .
Nandini Naik
June 14, 2021
Answers:
1.under the Eiffel tower.
2.Raghu because this is the first day of school and there was no exam.
3. because there were no other man came there other than that strange man.
4. because the writer put his last will on April 20 and Rishab says that he found the will on date 10 April that means the last will is true and Rishab was lieing.
5. That one of the person in the house is burgler.
Ian Calisto Nunes
June 14, 2021
Case 1-. The writer had his lunch in his dinning room n not outside.
Case2- Raghu.
Case3- He was new to him as he never saw him earlier.
Case 4- April 20th will is a recent will.
Case 5- A burglar cannot enter through a small hole .
CH SUHAAS
June 14, 2021
Case 1: Writer had lunch inside the Eiffel Tower
Case 2: Raghu. When there is no exam for rest of the children.
Case 3: He was a twin brother of his friend
Case 4: There are no pages between 113 & 114.
Case 5: When a window is broken from the outside by a thief, most of the glass will be found on the inside of the house, not on the outside of the house
Rishika Sharma
June 14, 2021
Answers
Case 1
He was having lunch at the restaurant below Eiffel tower
Case 2
Raghu, because on the first day of school he was writing his exam paper
Case 3
The stranger was David twin brother
Case 4
A writer may write a will as a part of his story
Case 5
It was not robbery because the window pieces were not inside the house.
If this was a robbery, then the burglar must break the glass by hitting on the glass from outside the house and the glass pieces must have scattered inside the house.
~Rishika Sharma
TARUN SHARMA
June 14, 2021
Ans.1 – From the top of tower, it will never visible.
Ans.2 – Raghu because the examination can not start before the prayer and from the first day of the school it is not possible for examination.
Ans.3 – Because his face was matched with his friend David.
Ans.4 – The inspector said that page numbers 113 and 114 are back to back numbers of same page. So no one thing can be placed between these numbers.
Ans.5 – The broken pieces of the glass make the policeman sure because if someone hit the glass from outside most of the broken pieces will fall inside the room, but inside the room were only some tiny pieces were present and most of the glass was outside the room. Therefore the policeman understand that no one came in the room from outside.
Reuben Raju
June 14, 2021
1. UNDER THE EIFFEL TOWER
2. RAGHU WAS THE SUSPECT SINCE THERE IS NO EXAM ON THE FIRST DAY OF SCHOOL
3.
4.
5.ANYONE WHO STEALS FROM THE HOUSE THROUGH THE WINDOW WILL BE LEAVING THE PIECES OF GLASSES INSIDE THE HOUSE RATHER THAN OUTSIDE THE HOUSE. THUS THE BURGLAR WAS NO OUTSIDER
Swanandi Amit Sathaye
June 14, 2021
1. He was sitting on top of the Eiffel tower
2. Raghu it was their first day at school
3. It might be David’s twin brother
4. Pages 113 and 114 were on opposite sides of the same piece of paper
5. The window was too small for a burglar to get in the house
Md ali
June 14, 2021
1)under the tower
2)arushi
Shivi Dwivedi
June 14, 2021
1. He sat below the Eiffel tower
2. Raghu, because he was giving an exam on the first day of school.
3. The stranger was david’s twin brother.
4. Page 113 and 114 are alternate and Nothing can be in between them.
5. Glass was broken from the inside because the glass particles were scattered outside the window.
Alyanna Kelsy
June 14, 2021
Ans1. He sat with his back turned to the tower .
Ans2. Raghu was the one, because it is the first day of school, there is no exam.
Ans3. David didn’t talk about his appearance, he might have talked about his other traits.
Ans4. Rishabh found the will a week ago. His delay in reporting the will creates doubt. Plus the lawyer didn’t have it.
Ans5. The window was broken from inside
Shaun Abraham
June 14, 2021
Case 1 : The writer was sitting in a opposite direction of the Eiffel Tower
Case 2 : Raghu had taken the tuition money because it was the first day of school and there are no exam’s are conducted on the first day of school
Case 3 : David must have told Joseph his friend’s name and when he called out his name he replied back .
Case 4 : The will couldn’t have been the real one because you cannot put a piece of paper between pages 113 and 114 as the are on the same page just on opposite side’s.
Case 5 : The policeman was sure because if the glass was broken form outside all the shattered pieces would fall inside the house but the only little amount of glass was found in the house .
Manasvi Kaushik
June 14, 2021
Case-1 :- Hot Air Balloon
Case-2 :- Ron, because it is not allowed to chat with friends during school.
Case-3 :- May be he say his Id card or he had a tatoo of his name.
Case-4 :- He said it because he wanted to know that the boy is telling the truth or not and if not then he won’t be able to find any book called ‘Sidney Seldon’ to keep the will in.
Case-5 :- He thought that a robber can not enter the house through little bit broken glass.
Alena Zion Souza
June 14, 2021
Case 2.. The principal suspected Raghu because how can he be the only one who was writing the exam paper .
Kousthav p Nair
June 14, 2021
Answer 1: the person was eating his lunch in Eiffel Tower Answer 2: the principal suspected in Debby because she was late to come school Answer :5 children as playing cricket and the ball had might gone there in to the window
Aniruddh
June 14, 2021
Case 2 ans is raghu because if he is writing the paper then all of one should write paper.
Case 5 ans is police man sure than from a small hole how can a outsider go.
aadithya v.v
June 14, 2021
case-1 the writer ate from the eiffel tower itself
case 2 it was ron cause all of the friends were doing separate works how can he chat with friends during that time
case 3 they are brothers
Kousthav p Nair
June 14, 2021
Answer 1: the person was eating his lunch in Eiffel Tower Answer 2: the principal suspected in Debby because she was late to come school
Rohan Gopinath
June 14, 2021
Case1:The writer had the lunch in Eiffel tower it self.
Case2:According to me Raghu took her tuition fees as he said he was writing exam but it was the first day.
Case3: He understood because it was david.
Case4: He lied
Case5:The police man was sure as because no human can fit in window of scatterred piece.
Naitik Gupta
June 14, 2021
Case1- In effil tower
Case2- Ron
Ved Chalakh
June 14, 2021
Case 1: inside the Eiffel Tower
Case 2: Raghu, because on first day of school, no exam paper is given
Case 4: Sidney Sheldon is a author and no a book that can have pages
Case 5: the glass window broken was not not enough for any person to enter
Aaniyah
June 14, 2021
1 : The writer has taken the parachute to fly over the sky at the time of his lunch so that he cannot see the Eiffel Tower.
2 : The principal has suspected raghu because this was the first day of school so how could he write exam paper at 8 am.
3 : Joseph has identified the stranger because the stranger told him David’s name when they met.
4 : Inspecter diwakar has said to rishab to put that new will at the place from where he find it because sidney sheldon is a name of the writer not a book.
5 : The policeman was so sure because the window was fixed and cannot be opened and the area of broken glass is very small so that nobody can enter from the broken glass.
Mohak Raj
June 14, 2021
Case 1: He ate his lunch on the eiffel tower.
Case 2: They suspected Raghu because he couldn’t write the exam as it was the first day of school.
Case 3: The stranger was David’s identical twin.
Case 4: Because page 113 and 114 are two sides of the same page.
Case 5: If the burglar had broken the window from outside most of the glass pieces should have been inside the house
Pragyna Paramita Senapati
June 14, 2021
Case 1 the writer would have been his lunch inside a closed room or may be inside his own home with the windows shut.
Case 2 the principal would suspect Raghu because he said that he was writing the exam paper but in schools there is a certain time and date for exams this means he is lying as others and not writing any exam paper rather they are busy at something else.
Case 3 David never give any description of the appearance of the person but he may have given a certain different description like he may have said that the person eats too much it means he may be fat then he have some eye defects, it means he would be wearing glasses therefore joseph would have been able to understood who he was when he met him.
Case 4 the inspector said this because the book Sidney Sheldon was written by an American writer Sidney Sheldon not by Mr Bhosie it means Sidney Sheldon has kept that paper for his own nephew not for Rishab.
Case 5 the police man was sure as whenever a outsider will enter the house by breaking the window glass than most of the pieces of glass will fall inside the house and a few outside the house but as more pieces of glass are fallen outside and a few inside it means that someone from inside the house have gone out side by breaking the window glass.
Jayadevan.N.J
June 14, 2021
1.Guy de Maupassant ate his lunch in the hot air balloon.
2.Raghu is lying there is no exam on first day of school.
3.He was a twin brother of Joseph’s friends.
4.Sidney Sheldon is a American writer not a book.
Meghna Chakraborty
June 14, 2021
CASE 1- Guy de Maupassant could have his lunch anywhere in the Eiffle tower because from that place also the Eiffle tower is not visible .
CASE 2- The principle suspected Raghu because in the first day of school there can’t be any exam.
CASE 3- He can be one of this friend’s twin brother
CASE 4- Inspecter Diwakar told this to Rishab because he understood that the will Rishab produced in the court on April 20 was not the original one because Rishab told that the will was between page no. 113 and 114 of the book “Sidney Sheldon” while odd number pages always stays in right and even number pages always stays in left so it is wrong that it is page 113 and 114.
CASE 5- The police man understood this that no outsiders had come in the house because if any one had come in the house from outside, by breaking the window then most of the glasses would be found in the house not outside .
Arijeet Dutta
June 14, 2021
1)He had his lunch under the Eiffel tower! Or in a closed room.
2) The principal suspect Arushi because she can’t read the news while she was attending the morning assembly.
3) ?
4) The inspector said that because it can be anyone’s will other than his uncle’s will.
5) The policeman found only tiny pieces of glass particles and he found no stone to break the glass inside his house.
Bharadwaj
June 14, 2021
1).In the Eiffel tower
2). Raghu
3).he was David
4).he was Sidney Sheldon and the will was a part of the novel.
5).if he had entered through the outside the glass would have fallen inside.
harshitha
June 14, 2021
1st one— because he was having his lunch sitting inside the Eiffel tower so he could not see the tower…
2nd one–Raghu was the culprit as it was the first day of school and he said that he was writing an exam.
3rd one—he came to know the stranger as he introduced himself when he met Jose[h.
4thone—-will is the important document which cannot be kept in any book..and also the dates are also not matching.
5th one–there were few tiny pieces inside the house and not outside…. and the hole on the glass was small and a robber cannot enter through it.
Alisha Siddiqui
June 14, 2021
sorry by mistake I pressed the submit button even though 5th question was left
And the answer of the 5th question is……
=because the broken glass was so small that even a book can not get in or out.
Thank you mam for this exciting blog!
Dhiraj mali
June 14, 2021
1. The writer had his lunch in the house . 2.the principal suspected Raghu . 3. The Stanger told that I am friend of David . 4. Because a week does not have 10 days .5 . The husband is the thief .
Ilakiya
June 14, 2021
1.The writer had his lunch on the Effil tower so that he can’t see the tower.
2.Ragul is suspected because he told he was writing exam on the first day of the school.
3.The stranger was his client or school friend.
4.It was a page of the book so he said to put it back.
5.There where only few pieces of glass so no one can enter from outside because it was his wife who had made him scare.
JManjusree
June 14, 2021
2. I think raghu because at early morning any one will not write the exam
Sneha Agarwal
June 14, 2021
Case 1- the writer was on a hot air balloon as the hot air balloon flies higher than the height of the Eiffel tower the right I couldn’t see the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2- The teacher suspected Raghu because there is no way that anyone can have exam paper on the first day of school.
Case 3- The Stranger Joseph met was an employee that David told him about.
Case 4- The inspector told those words because the nephew was lying as page 113 and page 114 cannot be together in a book.
Case 5- The police man wasn’t sure because If someone tried to enter the house breaking the window the pieces would be inside of the house not outside.
Sai Deep
June 14, 2021
Case 2 is Raghu, because on the first day of school, there can’t be an exam on the first day of school
Sai Deep
June 14, 2021
Case 2 is Raghu, because on the first day of school, there can’t be an exam
Akshadha Vijesh
June 14, 2021
1: Under the Eiffel tower
2: Raghu, there would be no exams during the first day of school
3: The stranger was with David
4: The “rewritten will” was written 10 days before the actual will
5: A burglar couldn’t go through such a small window
Alisha Siddiqui
June 14, 2021
1:Outside of the city.
2:How can there be an exam on the first day of school.
3:He was a friend of David.
4:Because it was a part of the book.
5:
Madhav
June 14, 2021
1) The writter ate the lunch in Eiffel Tower, so he can’t see the Eiffle Tower.
2)Raghu stole the fees. Because he was saying that he was writing the exam. But it was the first day of the school. On first day school doesn’t conduct any examination.
3)The stranger may be Joseph’s twin brother
4)The will cannot be kept in between pages 113 and 114, since there is no space in between those pages.
5)When a window is broken from the outside by a thief, most of the glass will be found on the inside of the house, not on the outside of the house.
Prashant yadav
June 14, 2021
Case1 under the Eiffel Tower
Case2 Raghu
Case4 sidney sheldon is a writer
Case5 broken window glass was very small
Case3 he knows him
Deepak Pydipamula
June 14, 2021
Case 1- he was on top of the Eifel tower.
Case 2- Raghu is the culprit. There are no exams on the first day of school.
Case 3 – Joseph might not have seen him but he might have heard him.
Case 4 – Page 113 and 114 are 2 sides of the same page. A will can not be put in between them.
Case 5 – If a person broke in from outside, there would be a lot of pieces of broken glass inside the house.
Lekshmi Jayan
June 14, 2021
1) He was sitting inside the restaurant in the Eiffel Tower so he cannot see the tower!
2) How can there be an exam on the first day of the school? And if it is even there, why was Raghu alone writing it? So Raghu stole Tina’s tution fees.
3) The stranger may be David’s twin brother. So he identified him not knowing who he is!
4) The inspector said so because nothing can be kept between page no. 113 and 114. This is because 113 and 114 are two sides on one page so we can’t keep anything between it!
5) No thief can enter through a small hole like that!
Sreegopika.S
June 14, 2021
Case 1 ; The writer might have sat under the Eiffel tower.
Case 2 ; The principal suspeted Raghu,because on the first day there cannot be an examination.
Case 3 ; David is a common friend.He would have told the stranger about Joseph and his appearance.
Case 4 ; Nothing can be kept between pages 113 and 114 as they are two sides of a sheet.
Case 5 ; If the burglar had come from outside,the broken glass pieces would have fallen inside,but that was not the case.
K. Bharath Krishna
June 14, 2021
1. Under the tree
2. Rahul because they will not write the exam
3. He was his friend
4. Because he went to library
5. The glass is broken smaller
Ayaan Sayed
June 14, 2021
1. He ate at the top of the Eiffel Tower
2. Raghu, EXAM ON THE FIRST DAY OF SCHOOL!? Ya right…?
3. The man came to meet him first
4. Pages 113 and 114 are back to back pages in any book
5. If the robber came from outside then all the glass pieces would have been in the house!
Bhuvi Chaturvedi
June 14, 2021
1) He ate his lunch under the Eiffel Tower.
2) Ron, because all the others statements can be verified independently.
3) Maybe Joseph knew about the stranger’s qualities and interests.
4) The inspector said so because any books ‘ page 113 & 114 are two sides of same page and there cannot be any space to hide a will there.
5) Any break in the glass from outside will cause more glass pieces to fall inside not outside the room.
Kratika Yogi
June 14, 2021
1. at the top of the EIFFEL TOWER
2. RAGHU because he was writing the exam paper in the morning assembly
3. dont know
4.because page no. 113 &114 ARE THE OPPOSITE SIDES OF A PAGE
5. because nobody can enter from such a SMALL SPACE
Aaditya PATIL
June 14, 2021
Case 1 – At the base of Eiffel tower.
Case 2 – Raghu.
Case 4 – Because there is no page. between 113 and 114 pages.
Case 5 – When someone hit the window from outside then the pieces of glass window fall inside,but the pieces of glass window fall outside of house
Eshan sharma
June 14, 2021
My gases are
Case 1. I think the writer have his lunch at the opposite side of Eiffel tower
Case 2 I think Raghu because only Raghu says that he is writing a exam but other students not , so Raghu is suspect by the principal.
Case 3 the Joseph friend tell him.
Case 4 the inspector diwakar say this because the old will is not valid
Case 5 the police man is sure because the glass broken pieces are out side of the house , so the glass broken from inside.
Hemashree Mahesh
June 14, 2021
Answers
1. The writer ate his lunch below the Eiffel Tower.
2. The principal’s suspect was Raghu because no one will tell him to write an exam on the first day of school.
3. The stranger who Joseph met was David because David was a known person to Joseph. Thus, he could identify him.
4. The inspector told this because when the writer has 3 children of his own, why would he give it to others(his nephew), even though if the writer would give some amount of his property to Rishab, he would have mentioned in the will.
5. The policeman was sure that no burglar or an outsider did the robbery, as no one could fit through a tiny space on the glass window.
Sujanya De
June 14, 2021
Case 1: The writer probably had lunch in some other city of Paris so that it wasn’t visible from there, and also as it was mentioned that the Eiffel Tower was visible from every part of one particular city.
Case 2: The principal probably suspected Raghu as he couldn’t have been the only one to write the exam papers.
Case 3: The stranger whom Joseph met was David himself who probably might have fooled Joseph by telling him about a ‘stranger’.
Case 4: The inspector said so because, as it was mentioned, Rishab found and told about the second will 2 days ago, so it’s definitely not possible for him to find it a week ago.
Case 5: The fact that the broken window glass was probably too small for anyone to break in, and it wasn’t a burglary because, it might have been possible that someone else in the house dropped or threw something out the window made the policeman sure.
anagh
June 14, 2021
1.Below the Eiffel tower
2.Raghu.
3.The stranger maybe deaf/dumb/blind.
4.Rishab found the will when his uncle was alive.
5.The shattered glass pane was too small for a person to enter.
anagh
June 14, 2021
1.Below the Eiffel tower
2.Raghu
3.The stranger maybe deaf/dumb/blind.
4.Rishab found the will when his uncle was alive.
5.The shattered glass pane was too small for a person to enter.
Abhiram Ratheesh
June 14, 2021
case 2 : there is no examination o the first day of school….
case 5 : the glass pieces where outside the window. That explains that it wasn’t any robbery done by a robber…
Shriashrit Kumar
June 14, 2021
Nice and interesting questions ??
Yash Mani Gupta
June 14, 2021
Case 1: In the Eiffel Tower
Case 2: Raghu (As there is no exam on the first day of school)
Case 3: The stranger must have known Joseph’s appearance
Case 4: Because Sidney Sheldon is a writer and not a book.
Case 5: The burglar couldn’t have entered through such a small space
SHLOK PARIKH
June 14, 2021
Case 2 : Raghu is the suspect because there are no exams on the first day of school??
Sarthak Verma
June 14, 2021
First case ans- the writer could not see the Eiffel tower because she/he would be on the top of it.
Second case ans- Teacher would have suspected Raghu as he was the only who was writting exam and if there was exam everyone would have been writing it.
Fifth case ans- police man was sure that it was not a outsider or a burglary because there was tiny hole in the window glasses and the outsider or a burglary would not fit in that.
Aradhya
June 14, 2021
Case 1) at the base of the eiffel tower.
2) Raghu, because it was the first day of school.There won’t be exams on the first day of school
Rudransh rai
June 14, 2021
Ans 1 – The writer had his lunch just below the tower
Ans 2 – The principal suspected because all four Freinds were with Tina at 8pm that day .
Ans 3 – Because he heard about his look from his friend David.
Ans 4 – because there is no space between pages 113 and 114.
Ans 5 – because there is no pieces of glass inside only some tiny particles left .
Aahna Singh
June 14, 2021
1) In the Eiffel Tower
2) Raghu. Since it was a first day of school, there couldn’t possibly be an exam
3) David himself
4) Sidney Sheldon was never written by Mr. Bhosle
5) If it was a bulgary, then the majority pieces of glass should be inside the house, not outside
Rohit
June 14, 2021
Case – 1
He ate his lunch in his quite room.
Case – 2
Raghu, because there can’t be any exam paper on the first day of the school.
Case – 3
The stranger must have had a placard with him, with Joseph’s name on it.
Case – 4
No one can place a paper in between page number 113 and 114. Rishabh was lying.
Sharanya Rao
June 14, 2021
1. On the Eiffel tower
2. RAGHU
3. DAVID DAD
4.
5. THE GLASSES WERE SCATTERED OUTSIDE SO WINDOW WAS BROKEN FROM INSIDE.
Abhijna R Bhat
June 14, 2021
1.he may be sitting on the top of the tower , so that he couldn’t see the tower.
2.Raghu , because no will write exam on the reopening day of the school.
3David might have told that the stranger would meet him on that day . Or David might have told about his character and by seeing his face Joseph might have recognised him.
4.because he revised his will again on 20th.
5.because no one could enter in through such a small crack on the window.
Aarna Behal
June 14, 2021
Case 1. On one of the floors of the tower. He can’t see the tower when he is on it.
Case 2. Raghu. Everyone was at assembly. How was he writing the exam?
Case 3.
Case 4. Page 113 and 114 are on either side of thr page. There is no way to stick anything between them. In a novel the odd pages are on the right and even pages on the left.
Case 5. There were few glass pieces inside so the glass had been broken from the inside.
Smaran Mehta
June 14, 2021
Case 1: On top of Eiffel Tower
Case 2: Raghu. Because, there is no exam on the first day of school.
Case 3: The stranger introduced himself.
Case 4: The pages 113 and 114 are two faces of same sheet of paper.
Case 5: If the burglar had broken in from outside, most of the broken glass would have fallen inside the house and not outside.
Makarand Sathe
June 14, 2021
In Case 2nd the Raghu is suspect because first day of school there is no paper
K Harshit Reddy
June 14, 2021
1a.The French writer had his lunch inside his house.
2a.Principal suspected Raghu because he told that he was writing the exam paper..but there will be no exam on the first day of the school.
3a.stranger knows about Joseph appearance and met him.
4a.The will cannot be placed between pages 113 and 114 because both pages are located on the same piece of paper.
5a.if anyone broke the window from outside, the bigger pieces would have been inside the house and tiny pieces would have been outside the house..but in this case,it was vice-versa.
Sai Suhana Ratnala
June 14, 2021
1:he ate his lunch at the bottom of the Eiffel tower
2:it is the first day of the school and how can Raghu write a exam
3:the stranger is Joseph’s brother
4: pages 113 and 114 lie on the same paper
5:if someone broke into their house the glass pieces should be inside his house
Aditi Singh
June 14, 2021
1. Writer had never accepted the presence of Eiffel tower means he had never seen it and it is mentioned that tower is visible from every part of Paris means writer was living in some other city and use to have his lunch there.
2. I think principal must had suspected Raghu because one student said that he was chating with his friend and one said that he was reading news but Raghu said he was writing exam papers and in exam students are neither allowed to chat with friends or read anything else accept question paper.
3. Devid must had mentioned joshep stranger’s name and when he met he had asked his name and get to know that he is whom.
5. If a person would enter house from window then he would have to make a big hole in the window and if he would make a big hole there would be a lot of pieces of glass scatter around the window not only a few small pieces would be there. So by seeing only a few small pieces the policemen became so sure.
Soumya ranjan Behera
June 14, 2021
Case 1- The writer might had his lunch on the top of the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2- Ron may be the principal’s suspect as he told he was chatting because Arushi told that she was in morning assembly, if morning assembly was going on, then Ron was chatting with whom?
Case 3- The stranger might be the twin of David.
Case 4- The most pieces of the glasses were fallen on the outside as fewer pieces were fallen inside, that means the glass was broken from inside.
Case 5- The inspector said so because he knew that the will was fake as In no book, no paper can be kept between the pg no. – 113 and 114 as they always lie on the opposite sides of a page.
Radhika Sunanda
June 14, 2021
1ans…. He was sitting below the eiffil tower.
2Ans…..Raghu…if he was writing exam everyone should attempt it.
3Ans….I think David was with him.
4Ans….because 113 and 114 get printed to one page itself.
5Ans….because the hole was so small that the man or even a child could not enter.
Mirr
June 14, 2021
1. Maybe that guy ate his lunch on the top of eiffle tower or maybe he eats his lunch he closed room.
2. Raghu stole the tution fees as no one give exam on their 1st day of school.
4. The inspector said that so, because sidney sheldon was a writer and it is not a book where he can find the will
5. beacuse obvioulsy a robber can’t come itno the house with such a tiny hole
Sooraj.H
June 14, 2021
Answers
Case 1 : Ate lunch at base of Eiffel
tower
Case 2: It was Reghu since it was first day of school and there wouldn’t be any exam on first day
Alisha Siddiqui
June 14, 2021
1 :Outside of the city .
2: Raghu !because any other students didn’t have an exam
5: The broken glass was so small that the thief can’t get in.
And where is question 3 and 4 pls give me chance!
Thank you
KIRTI B DHONDGE
June 14, 2021
CASE 1 :HE WOULD SIT UNDER THE EIFFEL TOWER OR INSIDE A CLOSED ROOM FROM WHERE HE COULD NOT SEE THE TOWER.
CASE 2: THE PRINCIPLE WOULD HAVE SUSPECTED RAGHU BECAUSE HE TOLD THAT HE WAS WRITING EXAMS BUT IF THERE WOULD BE EXAM OTHER STUDENT WOULD ALSO HAVE BEEN WRITING THE EXAM , BUT ALL WERE NOT WRITING WHICH MEANS HE WAS LYING AND HE HAD STOLEN THE MONEY.
CASE 5: THE POLICE MAN WAS SURED BECAUSE BURGLAR WOULD BE A MAN WHO WOULD BE BIGGER IN SIZE AND THE WINDOW WAS BROKEN IN VERY LESS AMOUNT WHICH SPECIFIES THAT ANY HUMAN BEING CANNOT COME FROM THAT SMALL BROKEN WINDOW …
Rudra
June 14, 2021
Case 1 behind the effel tower
Case 2 Raghu
Case 3 He seen his photo before
Case 5 A peices of glass make him
Sure
Ayush yadav
June 14, 2021
Case 2 : Debby
U.Venkat
June 14, 2021
1.He ate near the base
2. Principal suspected Raghu because how can he write exam on the first day
4. No book has odd number and even number next to next
5. The window was broken from inside
Triyanshu Palai
June 14, 2021
1. At Eiffel tower restaurant underneath the Eiffel tower
2. Raghu as in exam all the students of a class will appear it.
Mayand Singh
June 14, 2021
CASE:-1
It was the only place in Paris where he couldn’t see the Eiffel tower
CASE:-2
The principal suspected Ron as he was in the school at that time whereas the other 3 where outside of school. Raghu was was writing the exam paper so he could not come out of the exam hall, Arushi was in the assembly reading the news so she also cant come and Debby was late
CASE:-3
Joseph understood that who was he as he never met him and the person who we never meet and lnow is said to be a stranger
CASE:-4
Because the claim was wrong
CASE:-5
The policeman was so sure as how can a man or robber could get in through that tiny hole broken window
Atharv kaushik
June 14, 2021
First:under the tower
Second:Raghu
Third:he was David’s identical twin
Fourth:There is no 113 and 114 page of Sidney Sheldon
The pieces were on the outside so the window was broken from the inside
Y.TEJASH
June 14, 2021
Case1= Middle of the Eiffel tower
Case 2= Raghu because no school is conduct exam on first day
Case 3= Because his friend David
Case 4= Because Rishab says he found the paper in pages in between 113 , 114.
Case 5= Because husband says the theif broke the window but their
was only few pieces near the window.
Gorang agarwal
June 14, 2021
Ans 1 he eat lunch below the tower
Ans 2 principal suspect raghu
Ans 5 the hole was too small to pass a human being.
Sumanyu Singhal
June 14, 2021
a) At his Home, turning his back towards the Eiffel Tower.
b) Raghu, because he is saying he was writing exam on the first day of school.
c)
d) Because Page No. 113 & 114 are twosides of a single page
e) Only a small portion of the glass was broken, through which no one could have entered the huse
Sudhakar yadav
June 14, 2021
Jzjxjxiix9 9oxkdos99xx
Charvi Gupta
June 14, 2021
Case 1 : The man sat on-top of the Eiffel Tower and had lunch because they mentioned that the Tower was visible throughout the whole city .
Case 2 : The Principal suspected that Raghu might have stole the fee because he mentioned that he was was writing the exam paper .. but if it was the first day of School then how could be writing an exam paper ?
Case 3 : I think that Joseph recognised the man because he was probably the only man in the room besides Joesph .
Case 4 : Rishab was lying because there is no page between 113 and 114 !!
Case 5 : The policeman was so sure because if the burglar came from outside and threw a stone from outside the glass pieces should be inside and not outside .
guneet grover
June 14, 2021
case 1 – inside Eiffel tower itself
case 2 – raghu, there should not be any exam on the first day of school , also he was the only person giving the examination .
case 3 – david might have told joesph the strangers name and his name might have been written on his clothes
case 4 – paper cant be placed in between 113 and 114 pages as they are overleaf pages
case 5 – when a window breaks most of the glass falls in opposite direction of impact ,so window of house was broken from inside . therefore it is not a robbery
Nihitarth Singh
June 14, 2021
case 1=The writer has lunch in the centre of the tower which cannot be visible,case 2=It is debby because he was running late and reached school at 8:10 am,case 3=He understood who he was is his David,case 4=because that will was 10 days old and risab found it in a book before 1 week (7 days) and he sayed this will made by his uncle before 2 days,case 5= the burgler is not enter into the small window broken glass so,the policeman made so sure that there is no burgler.
Suchana panja
June 14, 2021
1:He have his lunch to take behind the tower that he can’t ?see this
Anuj Sharma
June 14, 2021
In case two the Debby is thief because Tina lost her money of tution fee not in school and Debby says he was running late for school so the Debby is thief.
Jeremiah Jada
June 14, 2021
Case 1:He must’ve eaten his meal in the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2:Ron is the thief as he is a new student and a new student doesn’t have any friends in their new school.
Sudhakar yadav
June 14, 2021
Case 1 answer The popular French writer Guy de Maupassant (1850 – 1893) reportedly ate lunch in the Eiffel Tower’s restaurant every day for years—not because he loved the great iron monument but because, so the story goes, it was the only place in Paris where he could sit and not see the tower itself.
Abhradeep das
June 14, 2021
Case 1: he was taking his lunch inside his house, where all the doors and windows are closed
Case 2: Raghu said he was giving exam but how can be there any exams in the first day of the school
So he is the principle’s suspect
Case 3: there’s no other was present in the place where Joseph is supposed to met with the stranger
So he identified him
Case 4:page number 113 and 114 of Sydney Sheldon is not the middle page, so Rishab was lying and inspector
asked him to keep the will back , from where he find it
Case 5: policeman said that it was not a burglary and no outsider had entered his house through that window
Because if someone would have broken the window, then the pieces of glass must be found ,. Inside
the house, but he pieces of glasses were outside that means someone had broken the window from
inside the house
And the couple cased the fake bulglary for the insurance claim
Anvesha bansal
June 14, 2021
1) the writer was eating food in the restaurant which was situated in Eiffel Tower so that file Tower is not visible to him.
2) the principal suspects Raghu because there were no exam conducting that time.
3) because when they meet david photo had been told his name to Joseph.
Mohammed Ayan
June 14, 2021
Case – 2 ans is raghu
–
Suchana panja
June 14, 2021
5:burglar never entered into the house through the window because he know that people can wake up by the noise when he break the glass.
Mohit Gupta
June 14, 2021
1.opposite side of Eiffel tower ?
2.debby
3.may he has called the man or some special identification may present there
5. May the theif was trying to wander themselves
Kriti agarwal
June 14, 2021
1— he ate his lunch in a closed room so he was not able to see the tower.
2—RAGHU as how can anyone can have exam on first day of the school
3—Because the stranger was just introduced to joseph by his friend david
4—113 and 114 page no are on the opp side of a single page so how can a will could be kept between them
5—if anybody would have thrown stone from outside then maximum pieces of glasses should be inside the house but that was not the case
Ryann Binoy
June 14, 2021
1st case he just turned his back on the Eiffel tower
2nd case the suspect is Raghu because he said he was writing exam on his first day
3rd case the stranger was a celebrity
4th case the policeman said that because he said the will was made 10 days ago but he found a week before
5th case more pieces of broken glass was outside than inside so the detective told it’s not a burglary
ARNAV SINGH
June 14, 2021
Not sure if my answers are correct.
1. He can have his lunch by facing his back towards Eiffel tower means he can sit in a opposite direction.
2. Raghu, Arushi said that she was speaking news in morning assembly means that at that time assembly was going on so how could Raghu be giving exam.
3. IDK
4. Inspector said this because 113 and 114 alternative pages of the book means that there are no pages between them. They are the opposite sides of one single page that’s why inspector said this.
5. Because if any thief had entered, then obviously he would not have cleaned the glass pieces.
Shakthipriya
June 14, 2021
1Q the writer sat at the Eiffel Tower for his lunch
2Q Raghu was the suspect because all his friends were in assembly but Raghu said he was in exam
3Q Joseph find because David didn’t say about his appearance alone not about his behavior
4Q the inspector said because he can be the strange of the case
5Q the policeman was sure because the glass pieces was more out and few inside so the burglary will be inside the house
Mohammed Talha
June 14, 2021
1). The Inwhenter of the Eiffel tower had lunch on Eiffel tower only.
2) The principal will suspend his fourth friend because the fourth friend was late and he only
Sreeansh Dash
June 14, 2021
Answer –
1.from inside or below Eiffel Tower.
2.Raghu because it was 1st day of school and no exam was there.
3.He was twin brother of Joseph’s friend.
4. Because if MR.Bhosle was a famous writer he will have put it in his book not other.
5.Because if it was broken from outside glass would only be inside .
Vaishnav K
June 14, 2021
Case 1: The Writer had his lunch under the tower’s Base Restaurant so that the tower will not be visible for him.
Case 2: Raghu because it was the first day of school and Raghu was saying that he was writing the exam paper.
Case 3: He was a twin brother of one of Joseph’s friends.
Case 4:The Inspector said this because Rishab said that the new will was found a week ago when he was going through his book collection but his uncle’s dismissal was 10 days later that new will so he had no chance going through his uncle’s book collection before his uncle’s dismissal.
Case 5: As there were only a few tiny pieces of window glass particles scattered near the broken window the police was sure that there was no burglary and no outsider has entered his house through that window.
Surbhi Shree
June 14, 2021
Case 1:
The writer sat in the opposite direction of Eiffel Tower for his lunch .
Case 2:
Raghu is suspect bcq he say that he was writing a exam paper but that day it was the first day of school .
Case 4:
He say this bcq he knew that rishab will is wrong bcq rishab say that he found this will in between the pages 113 and 114 but 113 and 114 is two opposite side of one page it means that rishab is saying lie.
Case 5:
The policeman is so sure bcq if someone enter his home by breaking his window the pieces of the glass is scattered inside the home if someone break it from outside but the pieces not scattered inside the home or near the window so it means no one entered his home through that window.
Suchana panja
June 14, 2021
2 :raghu, because there was no exam on the first day of school.
Shriya Nilesh samel
June 14, 2021
Case1. The writer would have his lunch at ground floor of the building.
Case2. Principal would suspend Ron because other all were busy in important work and they won’t be able to rob the money but Ron was just having the chat with his friend. So there is great chance that he would have robbed the money.
Case 3. Joseph may have met the stranger at the secret place were just they both must present and then he would have recognised him.
Case4.The inspector would have said this because mr. Bhosle as being a father he would have always choose to give a part of his property to his children and not the nephew. And if the inspector would have listened to nephew then it would be injustice to 3 of his children.
Case5. The policeman was so sure about it because the burglar would not be able to enter the house from that small hole over the window and he would have either crack the full window or else he would have found some another way to enter inside home.
Aryavardhan Singh
June 14, 2021
Byju ‘s Mystery Case Season – 2
Case 1: He ate his lunch at the base of the tower because it was the only place where the tower wasn’t visible .
Case 2 : Raghu , because there couldn’t be any exam on the first day of school .
Case 3 : They could be colleagues
Case 4: Maybe Mr. Bhonsle children knew that their father had changed his mind because of which they hid the paper and told the inspector to warn their cousin to not tell anyone about the will
Niranjana Manoj
June 14, 2021
2. Raghu was lying since he said he was doing an exam paper. But it’s the first day of school and you don’t get exam papers in the starting day..
4. Maybe a book of Sidney Sheldon doesn’t have this much pages.
5. If someone from the outside broke in through the glass there would be more glass on the inside than outside the house, but in this case there are more broken pieces of glass on the outside than the inside indicating that someone from inside the house robbed the couple and broke the glass window from the inside to make the theft believable to the couple and the cops.
Beaas Karmakar
June 14, 2021
1 He ate his lunch on top of Eiffel Tower.
2 Raghu, as it was first day of school – he can’t write an exam paper.
3 By calling his name.
4 Pages 113 and 114 are on either side of a paper in a book.
5 If the window had been broken from outside, all broken glass pieces would have been found inside the house.
Azraa
June 14, 2021
In case one the writer might have sat and ate lunch out of the city
In case two raghu is lying because there will be no exam in the first day of school
In case four the father would have written a story as giving the money to the nephew between the pages of 113 and 114
In case five if the glasses are broken and fell outside some one has broken the glass from inside so that is why the policeman was so sure
Kaibalya Mishra
June 14, 2021
1. Burj khalifa
2. Raghu
3. Because Joseph after meeting him just after the stranger must have knowned him and called his name first.
4. Because the Mr.diwaker must be in mr.bhosley’s support.
5.
Tarun Singh
June 14, 2021
1. Underneath the Eiffel tower itself.
2. Debby, because at the time of morning assembly all students are present there, so he is lying.
3. He was a twin brother of David.
4. “Sorry I didn’t get the questions !”
5. It was his wife
Srushti Saraf
June 14, 2021
Case 2 – The principal would have suspected Tina’s new friend Raghu , because in school when the exam is conducted all the students write exam at same time then how can only Raghu can write exam at 8am that day.
Sandesh. P
June 14, 2021
1. He had his lunch in the top of the Eiffel TOWER Where the tower is not visible.
2. The principle suspected debby because he was telling a lie.
3. By the stranger’s appearance and his talking style.
4. The inspectors said so because Rishab may be telling the page number which he would remembers.
5. The policemen was so sure that no one had entered the house through the window because no one can enter from the tiny hole through the window.
Abhinav Babu
June 14, 2021
1.In eiffel tower restaurant
2.Debby
3.His friend’s father
4. Policeman is one of writer’s sons
5.Policeman has been following the robbers
Kshirija Borikar
June 14, 2021
Case 2- Rohan was the one who stole the money. The reason why because who would he talk to if all we doing different things like reading newspaper, writing exam and coming late.
Aditi Nim
June 14, 2021
The principal suspected Raghu because no one has the exam on the very first day of the school.
Shaurya Yadav
June 14, 2021
1- The writer didn’t have his lunch
2-Ron because there was no exam
3-David was his twin so Joseph recognised him the moment he met him.
4-The inspector said this because why would his father leave the will to only him, it was obvious the will was fake because if the will was real why wasn’t it found first than the other will.
5- The policeman was sure because pieces of glass inside were so few and if the glass was broken from outside, more pieces of glass would be inside and so it was broken from INSIDE!
Aayan Arfin
June 14, 2021
I solved all of them easily ?
Aditi Nim
June 14, 2021
Case 1…..he lived in the basement ??
Adrika
June 14, 2021
Case 1
The writer will sit in such room where all the windows are closed by curtains .
Case 2
The principal suspected Raghu because, if he was writing an exam. why weren’t the others writing ? They syhould also write right ?
That’s what ! He was the culprit who stole Tina’s tuition fee.
Case 3
Joseph knew the man he met ;
The following may be the incident:-
When David was talking to Joseph he told him he sent him a gift or a parcel which was been delivered by a man he knows who was a shopkeeper near Joseph’s house , And to pick the parcel. That’s how he recognized him.
Case 4
The police said Rishab to keep it there as it was because it maybe that the police sensed that Rishab was the one having the false will as , why will a person be soo specific about a tiny page no ? The one who kept it there will know ! As he kept it and murdered his uncle to get his property !
Case 5
The police was sure because he knew no human could enter through a small hole in the glass.
Rajya Lakshmi
June 14, 2021
Case:1 He would sit in his room.
Case 2: Raghu stole Tina’s tution fee.
Case 3: David was everytime was talking about the stranger about his character, appearance, etc.
Case 4: Before 1 week his uncle was alive and he may not allow his nephew into his book collection.
Case 5: If there was a theif from outside and he had to come from outside then the broken glass pieces should be inside not it should be outside.
Vaishnavi Sharma
June 14, 2021
1 He had lunch below the Eiffel Tower
2 Raghu as it is first day there is no exam
3 David and the stranger were twins
4 113 and 114 are the opposite sides of the same page
5 It was too small for person to get inside
Prasad.V.Biju
June 14, 2021
1.The writer had his lunch behind an 81 storey building from where the Eiffel tower is hidden by the building.
2.Raghu was the thief because exams don’t take place in the first day of school.
3.The stranger was David’s Twin brother.
4.Sidney Sheldon does not have 114 pages
5. This was because the window was broken from the inside,if it was broken from the outside,majority of the broken glass would have landed inside.
Maithili Talwekar
June 14, 2021
1. Paris
2. I guess Debby
3. A stranger or a thief
4. ______
5. There were only two four particles of glass and no one one can come from such a small hole.
These all were my answers, sorry if they are wrong. ?
Manas Bhange
June 14, 2021
Case-1: Lunch taken at a restaurant in basement.
Case-2: Raghu. On first day no exam.
Case-3: I guess, David told about Joseph to the stranger or Joseph introduced about himself !
Case-4: April 20 will is latest.
Case-5: If window was broken from outside then major pieces of glasses would be inside the house.
Manasvi Ghag
June 14, 2021
Case 1: An underground place
Case 2: Raghu was the principle’s suspect because if it was the 1st day of school then shouldn’t be writing exam paper
Case 4: Rishab told policeman that he found the paper in between pages 113 and 114 but 113 and 114 are part of the same page.
Case 5: If the burglar would have entered the house from outside according to husband, then most of the glass pieces would be inside the house area. But most of the glass pieces were seen outside.
Haneen mohamed
June 14, 2021
In case 2 Raghu was principal suspect because in first day how he can write exam
Mahathi Muthu
June 14, 2021
1- He will have his lunch in the Eiffel tower.
2- Raghu because if there was a test then everyone must be writing the test so he is the one who was suspected by the principal.
5- Because the policeman found only very few glass pieces of the broken window and no human beings is that small to enter inside. Even that man’s wife didn’t say anything about the robbery.
Pratham Prasad
June 14, 2021
Case 1
The writer had his lunch under the Eiffel tower so that he cannot see the tower.
Case 2
Ron is telling lie.
Because how can he chat in school
I suspect him
Case 3
I think Joseph had heard about him with any other person
Case 4
Because between 113 and 114 there are no pages
Case 5
Because how can a person enter by breaking a little part of the window
Atharva umesh Bhakare
June 14, 2021
1.He was eating at the top of the Eiffel Tower.
2.Principal suspected on Raghu because how can he give exam at the first day of school?
5.How can a burglar can come inside the house through such a small hole?
Gayatri Vyas
June 14, 2021
Case 1
Guy de maupassant have his lunch exactly below eiffel tower because it is the only pace from where it was not visible.
Case 2
The principal suspect Raghu because there is no exam on first day of school
Case 3
As joseph met him he understood that he was a stranger because he had never meet him.
Case 4
If the books collection was of Mr. Bhosale then how did the book of sidney sheldon came in it this proves that Rishab’s claim was false,so the inspector said that put it back from where you found it.
Case 5
If the window’s glass was broken from outside major part of glass must have been fall inside the house,but if the glass was broken from inside major part fell outside and small pieces fell inside
this made the policeman sure that it was not a burglary and no outsider entered the house through window.
Kavya Khera
June 14, 2021
Answers:
1. He ate his lunch by sitting under the Eiffel Tower.
2. Raghu stole the money. Because no exam will be taken on the first day of school.
3. The stranger is David.
4. (Don’t know.)
5. It was the husband who broke the glass. Becuse if a thief broke the window from outside all broken glass pieces would have been inside the house, and the inspector found only a few glass particles inside.
Kaibalya Mishra
June 14, 2021
1. Burj khalifa
2. Raghu
3.
Diya
June 14, 2021
1.under the tower
2.Debby’s claim doesn’t have any witness
3.It is the prefixed time and venue
4.He remember the insignificant page number. So he has kept it there
5.The window was broken from inside
Praisy Raju
June 14, 2021
1. The writer had his lunch, just below the Eiffel tower
2. Raghu, because it is first day of school and they were practically taught nothing but was writing his exam.
3. He was David’s identical.
Anuj Doddakaragi
June 14, 2021
1-He ate in a closed place-at a restaurant on the basement of the Eiffel tower.
2-Raghu is the suspect. Who has their exams on the 1st day of the school’s academic year?
3-???????
4-I’ll take a guess. I think its because there is nothing “in between” pages 113 and 114 in any books, because they are on the same paper. They aren’t facing towards each other.
5-Most of the glass had fallen outside, which wouldn’t have happened if someone broke into their house.
Sweta Verma
June 14, 2021
Ans. No.-1
The writer had his lunch beneath the Eiffel tower.
Ans. No.-2
How was Raghu giving exam on the first day of school that’s why he was suspected by the principal.
Ans. No-3
The stranger was the identical twin of Joseph’s friend David.
Ans. No-4
The first will is not valid after the second will is made so inspector Diwakar told Rishab to keep the will back where he found it.
Ans. No-5
How can be the peices of glass window found outside the house if the window was broken from outside the house.
Janani
June 14, 2021
Case 1 :
The writer had his lunch under the Eiffel tower
Case 2 :
Principal suspect Arushi
Case 3 :
He may met him before
Case 4 :
The Inspector said that as in that book 113 and114 are pages printed back and front
Case 5 :
Only few particles were scattered inside the house, this made the policeman sure
Ajinkya
June 14, 2021
Case 1
Guy de Maupassant ate lunch at the base of Eiffel Tower.
Case 2
Raghu should be suspected because when the assembly is going on how can he write the exam. So I think he is the culprit.
Case 3
Joseph was sure because the stranger was David’s twin brother.
Case 4
The book’s story contained the will and rishabh thought it was his but it was from the story.
Case 5
It was not a burglary because the window was broken but a human can’t enter through it as the broken window is so small.
Akshaya Mariam George
June 14, 2021
Case 1
The writer Guy de Maupassant had found the spot for his lunch at the top of the Eiffel tower where the tower was not visible.
Case 2
Raghu was the one the principal suspected because he told he was writing an exam paper, meanwhile it was the first day of school.
Case 3
Because David would be there to introduce Joseph and the stranger.
Case 4
The inspector said like that because the will was able to put back between the pages( page 113 and 114 of Sidney Sheldon)of the book.
Case 5
The window was broken by the wife
(She didn’t say any word about the robbery).
Moli Shukla
June 14, 2021
Case 1= The writer have launch in Paris, French.
Case 2= Raghu sad that I was writing the exam paper but on the first day of the school there is no exam so how he can write the exam paper. So principle should suspect he.
Case 3= The stranger was David’s friend.
Case 4= the Inspector said these words because after the two days his nephew Rishab produce a new will in the court, claiming that his uncle had actually left all his Fortune to him.
Case 5= The police man noticed that only a few tiny pieces of window glass particles was scattered around near the broken window area inside the house he told the the husband that it was a buglary and no outsider had entered the house true that window.
Mahira singh
June 14, 2021
1)answer is eiffle Tower itself because it was only place in Paris where he could sit and not see the monument. .2) Raghu is whom principal suspected , how can he write exam paper if there was no test that day.
3)he was twin brother of one of his friend
4)
KSHITI SHUKL
June 14, 2021
CASE 1 : HE ATE HIS LUNCH AT THE BOTTOM OF THE
EIFFELL TOWER JUST NEXT TO IT.
CASE 2 : THE PRINCIPAL SUSPECT’S RAGHU AS IT WAS THE FIRST DAY OF THE SCHOOL AND HOW CAN THERE BE EXAM ON THE FIRST DAY OF THE SCHOOL.
CASE 3: JOSEPH MET THE STRANGER AND THEN HEARD ABOUT HIM FROM DAVID BUT HE KNEW HIS FACE AS HE SAW HIM BEFORE ALSO
CASE 4: HE SAID IT BECAUSE WHY WOULD THE FATHER WRITE IT ON A PAPER AND WHY WILL HE KEEP IN THE BOOK WHAT IF THE NEPHEW DIDN’T OPEN THE BOOK AND THE FATHER SHOULD GO TO THE NEPHEW AND HIS SONS TO TELL THAT HE IS GIVING THE PROPERTY TO HIS NEPHEW.
CASE 5 :HOW CAN A PERSON COME FROM THE SMALL PART OF THE GLASS HE IS SO BIG HOW CAN HE COME FROM THAT SMALL PLACE .
anushreyatomar5@gmail.com
June 14, 2021
Case 1:On the top of the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2: The principal suspect Raghu because on the first day of school no one takes exam.
Sreedev KP
June 14, 2021
Case 1: At the base of Eiffel tower
Case 2: Raghu, there can’t be an exam on the first day of school.
Case 3: David must be with the stranger.
Case 4: Page 113 and 114 must be on both sides of same paper.
Case 5: The glass was hit from inside as most of the glass pieces were scattered outside.
Akshita Godiyal
June 14, 2021
Case 2
Arushi
Vanshika Deo
June 14, 2021
1. He is sitting at the top of Eiffel tower ?
2. RAGHU because it’s written it was the first day of school so how could he was giving the exam ?
3. Because the stranger was the twin brother of his friend David ?
4. As it’s written that the case was of second will that means that the will Rishab got was the first will.??
5. When a window is broken from the outside by a thief, most of the glass will be found on the inside of the house, not on the outside of the house?️
DETECTIVE VANSHIKA DEO ?️♀️ solved all the mistery?VD ?
Srishti
June 14, 2021
Case 1: his home with all doors and curtains close
Case 2: raghu, as he was writing an exam paper on the first day of school
Case 3:he found him with his ID card ?
Case 4: he said this because pg 113 and 114 are back to back
Case 5: the police officer said this bcs if the burgler broke the window a lot of glass would have scattered inside the house, instead the husband broke the window from inside and hence the glass pieces were scattered outside.
Srishti ?
Sarayu
June 14, 2021
Case 2 – Teacher should suspected Raghu because he was writing exam. No one writes exams on the first day of school.
K.Hrithik
June 14, 2021
Case 1:-The writer built the hotel under the Eiffel tower.
Case 2:-The person who stole the fees was Raghu.Because nobody writes exam on first day.
Case 3:-I don’t know
Case 4:- nope, I don’t know
Case 5:-The husband told the theif broke through glass. But when police say the window, it was just a hole in window.(As shown in the picture.)
Shrey Agrawal
June 14, 2021
Case1.Inside the house
Case2.Arushi,because in the morning assembly how she could read the news.
Case3.
Case4.In the library,the inspector say this because he would know the place when he placed it on the place where he will get it.
Case5.the inspector is sure because there are few tiny pieces and from that small breaked window he cannot get inside the house
Soham Yashawant Mahajan
June 14, 2021
Case 2 – Principal will suspect raghu because if the exam is on that day others students also writing exam paper
Ishreen
June 14, 2021
Case 2= Arjun case3=Joseph may have heard of that man ? Case 5= the police suspected that if there were many pieces of glass then probably the couple was right but there were a few only
Suhasini
June 14, 2021
2.Raghu, because it was the first day of school and he was writing exam
K.Hrithik
June 14, 2021
case 1:-The writer built the hotel under the Eiffel tower.
Case 2:-The person who stole the fees was Raghu.Because nobody writes exam on first day.
Case 3:-I don’t know
Case 4:- I don’t know
Case 5:-The husband told the theif broke through glass. But when police say the window, it was just a hole in window.(As shown in the picture.)
Sarayu
June 14, 2021
Case 5 – The police was so sure because if the thief enters the house from the window, the glass pieces should fall inside the house and not outside the house.
Archika Aggarwal
June 14, 2021
1. The writer had his lunch outside the city of Paris.
2. Raghu, because if assembly was going on why was he writing exam paper.
3. Don’t know
4. There is no space between pages 113 and 114.
5. The pieces of broken glass were not present inside.
Dhruv M
June 14, 2021
Case1: He had lunch in the restaurant which is underneath the Eiffel Tower
Case 2: Raghu as told he was witting exam on first day of the school
Case 3: He was twin brother of Joseph’s friend David
Case 4: As page 113 and 114 are the opposite sides of same page and he cannot find the will in between these pages
Case 5: As most the window glass pieces were found outside and if anyone from outside wants to break the glass, the glass pieces should have been found inside rather than outside
Shania
June 14, 2021
• He had lunch under the tower
•Raghu,cause who has exams at 8:00 in the morning?
•He was David’s twin
• no idea
•if it was a break-in the glass would be inside not outside
MONIKA SRI
June 14, 2021
2.Raghu because first day no exam
Karthika . S. Nair
June 14, 2021
1. the writer had his lunch in a hot air balloon.
Sahasresh.T
June 14, 2021
Cracked them, but not the 4th case??
Kayna Desai
June 14, 2021
Case 1
The writer had lunch facing the opposite direction of the Eiffel tower so that he couldn’t see it
Case 2
The principal suspected Raghu as on the first day of school no one has exams.
Case 3
He was Joseph’s doppëlganger!
Case 4
It was a story and the new will was a part of the book the author was writing
Case 5
The policeman found pieces of glass on the other side of the window
Mokshanjani P
June 14, 2021
Case 2 – The principal suspects Raghu because tuitions or schools don’t conduct exam on the first day itself
Ashitha
June 14, 2021
In case 2 Raghu was the one who takes Tina’s tution fee. Raghu told principal that he was writing his exam paper but it was the first day of the school.
Devpriya Bhargava
June 14, 2021
Case 1: the French writer must have sat inside the Eiffel Tower itself.
Case 2: Ron is possibly lying and is a suspect of the principal as his answer of chatting with his friends wasn’t possible in that particular situation considering it was their first day at school and his newly made friends had been busy with their respective tasks.
Case 3: the stranger Joseph met, might have been David’s identical twin…..since he is obviously not related to Joseph and not famous but still recognisable due to the identical appearance.
Case 4: a book always has pages numbered in the following matter which is right hand side pages odd numbered and left hand pages even numbered so it wasn’t possible for the will to be between 113 and 114 as it is the same page just flipped.
Case 5: it could be possible for the policeman to not think so as the part of the window glass shattered wasn’t enough to make a living human being enter the house. So, he understood that the husband is lying and he is the burglar himself.
Hiral singar
June 14, 2021
Pilot book
Naman Chaudhary
June 14, 2021
Case 1 :- He was eating lunch inside a room.
Case 2 :- Principal suspect Debby because school was of 8:10.
Case 3 :- Because the stranger was David.
Case 4 :- Because Mr Bhosle was a writer who might have written the will for his book.
Case 5 :- Because if anyone had broken the glass from outside then the glass pieces must be found inside the house but glass pieces were found outside hence it was not a burglary.
Kashish Bhardwaj
June 14, 2021
Best Byju’s
A.R.Yashvika
June 14, 2021
1) He will sit under the Eiffel ?because he can’t see the tower directly in front.
2)Raghu because he lied that he was writing ✍test . Because how can principal not know that he was in exam .
3) might be a old friend ? but not sure about my answer.
4) because it might be the page of the comic. The Inspector might read that story.
5) because the ? glass pieces was outside of house ? if a burglary entered house the pieces must be inside of house
Ankita Jain
June 14, 2021
In case1
the person has made a lunch area out of this country so that he doesn’t see it
In case 2
Raghu is telling lie because others are busy doing their normal school days but Raghu is actually preparing for a exam paper
in case 3
Joseph knew who he was because it might meet him In an official work
In case 4
it seems that he should not take the paper because no one will leave 5 crores in a book and it can be a fake document and even he wanted the 5 crore so he told him not to take the new will
In case 5
Because no one can enter the windows from such a small break
Thank you
SHREENIDHI V
June 14, 2021
Mystery 1
He had his lunch under the Eiffel tower
Mystery 2
It’s Raghu. Because schools don’t conduct exams on the very first day
Mystery 3
1st possibility: if David has spoken about the stranger to Joseph…he would have spoken about Joseph to stranger hence the stranger would have showed signs of identification.
2nd possibility: Joseph would have met the stranger at his house.
Mystery 4
It must have been a back to back page!
Mystery 5
If window had been broken from outside then the glass particles would be more inside the house which is contradictory to the statement given by the couple’s.
Uday
June 14, 2021
when if writer is top on the eiffle tower how he can see the eiffle tower
Nazrin Sara
June 14, 2021
1. He sat with his back turned to eifell tower
2. Raghu, there are no exams on first day of school
3. He must be David’s sibling so he looks similar
4. Page 114 is the other side of page 113, It is the same paper
5. Since it was broken from outside more broken glasses should be inside
Arpit Kumar pal
June 14, 2021
1. Guy de maupassant ate his lunch facing backward of Eiffel tower.
2. Raghu because how can he write a eaxm paper in assembly.
3. He is David.
4. Sidney sheldon is a writer not a book.
5. Noone has entered the house because the window pieces where inside the house not outside.
M Kavin
June 14, 2021
1.Base of Eiffel tower
2. Raghu is the suspect because on the first day no exams are conducted
3. He was a twin brother of Joseph s friend
4. That bookshelf doesn’t have that book
5. When a window is broken from the outside by a thief, most of the glass will be found on the inside of the house, not on the outside of the house.
Sarayu
June 14, 2021
Case 2 – the teacher will suspect Raghu because no school conducts test on the first day of school
Ashwin
June 14, 2021
1.He would be in another city while lunch
2.Raghu,that day exam was not there because other where doing something
5.Because the hole is very small
Kimaya Gaurav Jahagirdar
June 14, 2021
Case 2-Raghu because he was writing the exam paper. If so all should be doing the same.
Case 4- page no 113 n 114 of any book are back to back.
Case 5- Small pieces of glass broken lied inside n not outside.meaning the glass broken from inside only.
Anurag Roy Chowdhury
June 14, 2021
1) Base of Eiffel Tower
2)Raghu
3) Stranger identified Joseph
4) Page 113 and 114 are on either side of same page.
5) If someone broke glass from outside, pieces would be inside
Najiha Zainab I M
June 14, 2021
Case 1- under the tower
Case2 – Arushi, because Ron and Raghu was busy with random things at 8:00am then how there would be assembly without the participation of two children’s in the same class
Case5- only few tiny pieces of glasses were scattered inside the house so if someone enters the house from outside then there will be more pieces of glass inside and not outside
Shaurya jaiswal
June 14, 2021
1. On the top of the effiel tower
2.Raghu beacuse all other are in the assembly but he said that he was writing question paper.
3.He was bis friend
4. Beacuse he said that he got it week ago
5.beacuse the broken part of glass was outside the window not inside
Dhruvank Srivastava
June 14, 2021
1. At his Dining Table, under a roof.
2. Raghu, because exams are not conducted on first day of school.
3. Because the stranger introduced himself.
4. because on april 18th he claimed that the property is his, but mr.bhonsle wasn’t dead then.
5. because if the window was broken from outside then it’s pieces would fell inside( not outside the window).
Mohit Srivastav
June 14, 2021
1)under Eiffel tower
2)Raghu: it’s impossible to write an exam paper on the first day of school
3)
Nidhi Parmar
June 14, 2021
Hello byju’s here are my answers for the riddles
1) The french writer most probably sat on top of the Eiffel tower that way he could not see the tower
2) Raghu has stolen the money as Raghu said that he was writing an exam paper but as it was the first day of school he could not have been writing his exam paper. Thus, Raghu has stolen the money and is lying
3) The stranger was most probably wearing an ID card. Thus, Joseph recognised the stranger
4) The original will was written on April 20 but Rishab says that the REVISED will was written on 10th April. If it would have been an REVISED will , it would have been written after the orignal will not before the orignal will. Thus, the inspector told Rishab to keep the will bach where he had found it
5) The broken glass was mainly outside the house and only bits of glass were inside the house. If a burglar had tried to come in the house, the broken glass would be inside the house and the bits of glass would be outside the house. Thus, the policeman was sure that no stranger entered the couple’s house.
uday
June 14, 2021
first case : the writer was top of the eiffle tower then how he can see the eiffle tower
soham
June 14, 2021
1-on top of the eiffel tower
2-raghu because if the children were doing a morning assembly how can there be an exam going on
3-he is not a stranger if you know the person
4-how did he know his uncle revised his will exactly
5-nobody can enter and leave through that small gap without leaving a clue
Lasya Madineni
June 14, 2021
Case 1: The writer will have lunch underneath the tower
Case 2: Raghu who was writing the exam paper on first day itself
Case 3: He was the twin brother of Joseph’s friend David
Case 4: Pages 113 and 114 will be the opposite sides of same page. So how can he find it in between those pages
Case 5: there were very few glass pieces found near the window, so nobody can enter in such small hole
Tasneem challa
June 14, 2021
Case -3: it could be someone from David’s family
Anurag Patel
June 14, 2021
Case I : He eat his lunch at its restaurant because at that place the tower is up of him and he couldn’t se eiffel tower because of the roof on top.
Cade II : Raghu because how can he write exam on the first day of school.
Case III : He knew because after they met the strange must have introduced himself .
Case Iv : page number 113 and 114 are different sides of the same sheet (front 113 and at the back 114) so any will cannot be placed between as it is a single sheet of paper .
Case V : if some outsiders was entered then the broken pieces must fall inside the house but the police noticed very few broken pieces inside the house.
Tasneem challa
June 14, 2021
Case -2: Raghu
Pallavi Dahiya
June 14, 2021
I think in the case 2 Raghu has stolen money because at time of assembly he is writing exam. This is not possible.
Tasneem challa
June 14, 2021
Case -1: he use to have lunch sitting on the top of the tower .
Akriti Arya
June 14, 2021
I think so, in case 2 the principle suspected Raghu because if there would be any exam than it would be for all students but only he was writing the exam , so he was definitely lying.
Aayushee
June 14, 2021
Case 1: he was having lunch in the tower’s restaurant
Case 2: Ron/debby , because they’re probably saying the lie
Case 3: ?
Case 4: ?
Case 5: because the crack was so small to enter the house
Bilal shah
June 14, 2021
Case 1- he had lunch outside of Paris
Case 2- it is Raghu because there is no exam on the first day of school
Case 3- don’t know
Case 4- because he couldn’t do it because a pair of 113 and 114 pg no doesn’t exist it can be either 112 and 113 or 114 and 115
Case 5- the hole was too small for a person to fit through it
Theivakumar
June 14, 2021
Case.2
Raghu
Because he was writting the exam paper in the frist day of the tuition
Shreya garg
June 14, 2021
in case 2 – principal suspect raghu because be is the only person to write his exam of the same class..
In case 5- police man noticed that its a small crack on the window and from that crack no body can enter house..
G Aansika Routray
June 14, 2021
Yes first I want to tell byjus is very nice app to fall in love with learning I am not sure about everything but I think I can answer some of this
Case 2
The principal suspected arushi because she told she was reading newspaper in the assembly how can it be possible so I think it’s her.
Case 5
The police man is sure Because the pieces are inside the house so maybe the thief was already in the house Because if the their came out from outside so the pieces must be in outside the house.
Ankita Jain
June 14, 2021
I liked the mistries
Debarghya chatterjee
June 14, 2021
Case1-The writer have his lunch in a room with no windows or any openings.
Case2- The principle suspected Raghu
because if the exam was held then everyone should write the exam paper
Case3- Joseph identified the stranger because David was with the stranger.
Case4- The inspector said this because Mr.bhosle is a writer from India and the nephew of him found the will on a book published in Sydney named Sydney Sheldon.
Case5- The policeman was so sure because no burger or outsider can enter through that small broken hole in the window as he or she will not fit in that hole.
M.Vignatha
June 14, 2021
2nd answer is Raghu because there is now exam in morning
Jagadish Babu
June 14, 2021
1 .. I don’t know
2. Raghu as it was the first day of school . On the first day there is no exam held
3.i don’t know.
4. IDK
5.because the glass panel was inside the house
Raghav Choudhary
June 14, 2021
1. In an Indore Restaurent.
2. Raghu because it was first day of school and on first day no exam in school.
3.Because the Joseph had never seen it before but the stranger had hear the description of Joseph from David
4. Because book of Sidney Sheldon has no more 113 & 114 pages.
5. Because there was a small hole in window and no one can cross it.
Baxi Swastik Narayan Sinha
June 14, 2021
Answer of case 1- He eats his lunch in his home.
Answer of case 2- Answer is Raghu. Because, none of the school takes the exam at the first day of school.
Diyasmi Pal
June 14, 2021
*Case 1* -> He sat at a place behind a taller building than the point at which he sat on so that his view of the tower was guarded
*Case 2* -> There is no way some school has exam on the first day therefore it is Raghu
*Case 3* ->
*Case 4*-> In a book page no. 113 and 114 cannot come together so Rishab is lying
*Case 5* -> Most of the pieces of the broken window should be inside the room if someone breaks it from outside to come inside
Diyasmi Pal
Class 7
Prasad Kumbhare
June 14, 2021
1. The man was sitting in France
2.Debby, as the principal questioned the students at 8 am and he told that he arrived at 8:10 am
3. He must be David himself
4. At first he said that the will was written a ten days before his dismissal and then he told that he found it before a week
5. If the glass of window was broken from outside the pieces must have in the house but they were out of the house this clearly mean that the window was broken from inside
Geetam shekhar pandey
June 14, 2021
These are the guesses by me:-
1- Maybe The writer was having the lunch at the Eiffel tower so that it was not visible to him.
2- I think Raghu could have stolen Tina’s money as, Other students were doing casual works and it seems like it was a normal day in class, while the Raghu was writing exam paper , which I think is a lie as it was normal day class so how could he write exam.
3- I not understood this case.
4- I don’t know this answer
5- Policeman was so sure as only a few pieces of window glass was scattered around the window area, while if someone tries to break the window to enter the house a large amount of glass pieces would scattered inside the house.
Thanks
Dhruv madineni
June 14, 2021
Case 1 : He will have lunch in the restaurant underneath the tower
Case 2 : Raghu because it was assembly time and he said he was writing exam
Case 3 : He was a twin brother of David( Joseph’s friend)
Case 4 : page 113 and 114 will be on same paper either side, how can he find the will in between these pages???
Case 5 : There were very few glass pieces scattered and nobody can enter the house in such small hole .
Mihika Kaushik
June 14, 2021
Loved these cases but l couldn’t solve 1 odpf them, so, byjus will u will not send the answers
Shloka Tomar
June 14, 2021
Case 1: He had lunch right below the tower.
Case 2: The principal suspected Raghu, because there are no exams on the first day of school
Case 3: The stranger was probably wearing a name tag, which led Joseph to recognize who he was.
Case 4: Page 113 & 114 would be printed on the same page, so it is not possible for the will to be between those pages. This led inspector Diwakar to believe that the will was forged.
Case 5: Since the bulk of the glass from the broken window was on the outside, it is evident that the glass must have been broken by applying force from the inside. Thus, the policemen believed that no outsider had entered their house and there had been no robbery.
M.Vignatha
June 14, 2021
1st answer is He will eat lunch from a place where the tower was not visible
Vanraj singh
June 14, 2021
Ans1. The writer have his launch from a place where the tower was not visible.
Ans2. Principle suspect raghu because he is doing exam while his classmate are doing assembly
Ans3. May be the stanger his client.
Ans4. Because 113 and 144 pages are on same page not on different pages
Ans5. The police man is so sure as no one can cross the window as there is a small hole
Mihika Kaushik
June 14, 2021
Loved these cases, but will u send the answers also byjus because l could not solve 1 of these cases
Sanjula
June 14, 2021
1) at the top of the tower
2)raghu
3)he was the only one in the mentioned place
4)it was a page from the book
5)coz no one can enter through that small hole in the window
Anish pan
June 14, 2021
1. The writer was probably having lunch outside Paris
2. It’s Raghu because there cannot be an exam in the first day of the school
4. Because there cannot be any gap between pages 113 and 114 as these pages are opposite to each other
5. As there were very small glass particles, so it can be guessed that a small part of the window was broken. And no burglar or outsider can enter through such small gap
Shraddha Keshari
June 14, 2021
Hello
Neeraj Kumar Sharma
June 14, 2021
Case 1- the writer have his lunch in his home
Case 2- Arushi , because why was she reading news paper during assembly?
Case 3- Because joseph knew about him from his friend ,David .
Case 5- The broken window area was too small so this made the policeman so sure
Nandhika Dinesh
June 14, 2021
Case 1: the writer had his lunch near a shop which is Just below the Eiffel tower, hence he cannot see the tower.
Case 2: Tina’s fee was stolen by Raghu (no exam is conducted on the first day of school).
Case 4: the inspector say that to Rishab because page 113 and 114 are on opposite sides of a page.
Case 5: if a person breaks the glass from outside the house , more pieces of glass would have been seen inside the house
Ayush.k.v
June 14, 2021
1: below the tower
2: arushi
3: may be he has badget which has his name
4:same page
5: only small piece of glass s brokn, if somebody enters thru that they may get hurt and there will be blood stain..
Ishita Jain
June 14, 2021
1. Outside the continent.
2. Raghu
3. Anyone called him David infront of him
4. pages define the truth
5. Because it was a tiny whole
Vaibhav R
June 14, 2021
1. He ate at the base of the tower . It is the only place he could not see the tower.
2. Principal suspected Debby as the suspects were questioned at 8:00 and Debby was there and he said he was late.
3. He could be the twin brother of someone he knows.
4.If he did not die on April 20 then how is it 10 days before his death?
5. If the burglar entered through the window, the glass pieces would have fallen inside the house. But it was very few.
Sakshi Singh
June 14, 2021
1. I think that he made his lunch place beneath or very close the Eiffel tower itself, where he can’t see it.
2. I think he would suspected Arushi because it is weird to read a newspaper during the morning assembly.
3. He might be any relative of David and may resembles with David.
5. As the glass pieces fell outside the window, which means the window has been broken from inside after robbery to escape.
Niharika Bora
June 14, 2021
Case 1- He was having lunch in Eiffel tower.
Case 2- Principal was suspecting Raghu because it was the first day of school and he said he was writing exam paper.
Case 3- Because his friend might have told him that David was coming to meet him.
Case 4- He said that he got it a week ago i.e 11th April so why did Mr. Bhosle kept it in the book before 9 days in his dismissal.
Case 5- Because the glass pieces were more at outside if the stranger had came inside so the pieces of the glass should be inside.
Sachi saxena
June 14, 2021
Inside the Eiffel Tower
Sachi saxena
June 14, 2021
Case 1 – Inside the Eiffel tower
shristy
June 14, 2021
1. At the terrace of the 81 storey building
2. Raghu as everyone was it the assembly how was he writing the exam
3. Maybe they would have decided the dress code
4. Because the books written by Sydney Sheldon are always on crime
5. Because a person or a man cannot enter through a small hole in the window
Savio
June 14, 2021
1 he sat in the direction where the tower wasn’t visible
2)Raghu, because on the first day of school there are no exams
Prittam mahapatra
June 14, 2021
Byjus no word for it.its just like a guru for me.its help me lot.totaly package.its teaching method and visualisation teaching so mind blowing.i like very much.thanks byjus and it’s all staff and team members.
Pallavi
June 14, 2021
Good app
Sakshi
June 14, 2021
2)Ron
Because he said I was chatting with my friends but his friends wasn’t able to chat with him. Arushi was reading newspaper. Raghu was writing the exam paper,and debby reached school late
Joshua K. Abraham
June 14, 2021
case 1: writer was eating lunch inside Eiffel tower.
case2: Raghu is lying. they are all in same class. if he had exam, all of them should have exam.
case 3: the stranger probably knew Joseph’s description and introduced himself to Joseph.
case 4: Rishab was lying. page no 113 and 114 are front and back of the same page.
case 5: if an outsider broke the window from outside, there should be more glass pieces inside the house not outside
Shravani Shere
June 14, 2021
1. he was sitting at base of Eiffel Tower.
2. Raghu because how can he wrote exam on very first day.
4. page 113& 114 lies on either page of book.
5. only few glasses pieces are fall in side &most of them are fallen out side thus we can say that glass is broken from inside.
3.stranger must be look like David
Soumya Soneja
June 14, 2021
At his house because its covered
Ron
By his body language
You should ask him?.
Because it may be so small that no one can went through in the house….
Viswarup
June 14, 2021
In the place where he would not be able to see the Eiffel tower
K. Kevin Sona
June 14, 2021
Case 1: Maybe on the tower itself?
Case 2: Raghu is my best suspect. He says he was writing the exam, while his classmates weren’t.
Case 3: Because of thermal stress burst of the window.
Junaid Akhtar
June 14, 2021
1) He use to it below the effect tower so that when he eats he won’t be able to see the tower.
2)Raghu is the suspect.
3)A paper can’t be found between 113&114.
Aditya Uttekar
June 14, 2021
Case 1- On top of the Eiffel tower
Case 2- Raghu as it was the first day of the school there cannot be any exam
Case 3- Joseph new his name.
Case 4- the will written on April 20 will be valid as it was the latest will
Case 5- no one can enter from such a small space
Radhika bawa
June 14, 2021
In case 2 Raghu was the suspect cause Tina was new in school means it was new session and raghu was the only who was giving exam??
Kaushik
June 14, 2021
1-on the Eiffel tower
2-Raghu
3-??
4-113 and 114 Are a single lapsed
5-if the glass breaks from outside the shattered prices will be inside
But the pices are out so the husband did
Harsh Verma
June 14, 2021
Case1-Maybe he went to some other place away from Paris.
Case2- Raghu…No one writes an exam paper on the first day of school
Case3- ????
Case4- Maybe the book Sidney Sheldon had less that 113 pages…
Case5- If the thief entered inside of the house then why were the pieces of glass outside of the house as told by the man
Abhhi
June 14, 2021
For case 2 it is obviously raghu, because it is the first day of school and almost no one has exams on the first day
Dhritishman Dutta
June 14, 2021
1. He may be sitting just below the eiffel Tower.
2. Raghu
3.the starnger came to Joseph along with David
4. Becouse Sidney Sheldon doesnot have so many pages.
5. A person cannot enter through such a small hole in the glass.
V.saharsh ram
June 14, 2021
1 he was eating at the base of the Eiffel tower
2 raghu because it is the first day of school and there will be no exam
5 if the burglar had broken the window from outside then there should be broken glass inside the house not outside
Ashita Kuber
June 14, 2021
In case 2 I guess Debby is talking lie
Meril George
June 14, 2021
Case 1: On the top of the tower
Case 2: Raghu, it’s the first day of school. There is no exam or test on the first day of school.
Case 3: Joseph’s friend David had told about the stranger to Joseph which may give an idea of the stranger.
Case 4: The page of the book 113 and 114 may not be on separate pages which made the inspector doubt him.
Case 5: The broken hole through which the man reported was too small for a human to enter the house. And also if the robber came from outside of the house through the window, the glass pieces would be inside the house.
Bhavika Behl
June 14, 2021
Case 1 – In a dark room
Case 2 – Raghu, because the other people were busy doing things and not in an exam
Case 3 – The Stranger was wearing a name tag or these 2 people were the only ones on the spot where they were supposed to meet or David pointed out the stranger person.
Case 4 – Maybe because the will was a part of the book- Sidney Sheldon.
Case 5 – Because for a person to fit through he glass hole was very small. ( P.S there were only a few tiny pieces of glass that meant that OT was just a faux clue left behind by the actual burglar.
Sahaana Darshini
June 14, 2021
Case 2: Ron
R. Krishnameera
June 14, 2021
Case 1- under the Eiffel tower.
Case 2 – Raghu , because if there was an exam all students would be writting it .
Case 3 – Joseph understood the stranger because the stranger came with David to meet him.
Case 5 – because only a little bit of the window was broken and a human cannot enter through the little area.
Kavin barath
June 14, 2021
1st question: From top of the eiffel tower
Vivek
June 14, 2021
1. At home.
2. Raghu, because assembly was going on so how was he writing the exam paper.
3. Because he had heard about the stranger’s name from his friend David and when he met him he was able to recognize the stranger by knowing his name.
4. Because the pages 113 and 114 can’t be continuous but opposite pages so nothing can be kept between those pages.
5. Because no one could enter from such a hole in that glass window.
Neeraj Sonawane
June 14, 2021
1.because he did his lunch on eiffel tower
2. Raghu because he was doing his exam and other had just arrived at school and some were at assembly
3.because he was his relative
4 . Because he didn’t want to solve that mystery
5. The police man was sure because only few particles of mirror were at down and a thief can’t come in that small place
ATIKSH JHA
June 14, 2021
CASE 3 ANSWER IS RAGHU BECAUSE THE WAS NOT STARTED YET
Md ayan
June 14, 2021
Noo
Farheen Fatima
June 14, 2021
1. At the Eiffel tower itself.
2. Raghu, how can he have an exam on the first day of school
3. He was the twin brother of Joseph friend
4. How did he know when his uncle died
5. Maybe someone has thrown a rock
Aditi Ghosh
June 14, 2021
Case 2 – The principal suspected Raghu as he made an excuse that he was writing the exam paper. But it was the first day of school. This proves that he was lying.
Case 5 – If a robber had entered the couple’s house then the broken glasses would be inside the house and not on the outside as the robber would try to break into the house from the outside. That is why the policeman told the couple that there was no robbery or burglary.
Prathamesh Jadhav
June 14, 2021
Case 1: The man would sit in a closed by all sides
Case 2: Raghu because there was no exam on that day
Case 3: He understood who he was by his personality
Nehemiah Preetish
June 14, 2021
1)Guy de Maupassant had his lunch under the Eiffel tower
2)Debby
3)The stranger was his friend David
4)To proclaim the will of five-crore property
5)A burglar can’t enter through a little broken window
Shreyasi Chanda ??
June 14, 2021
2. Raghu
Because at the first day of school, who will give exams at that time
5. Because if somebody came from the outside, then the glass pieces would be outside
Neeraja P S
June 14, 2021
Case 2
Raghu is the one who stole the money because it is the first day of school and there won’t be any exams
Case 5
Because if the window is broken from outside the shattered glass will be inside as the window is broken from inside the shattered glass is outside
Ayush Patnaik
June 14, 2021
I found for case 2 it is Raghu because their is no exam on the first day
Rutuja Patil
June 14, 2021
In Case 1 :- writer will have his lunch in Eiffel Tower’s restaurant ..
Sanskriti sharma
June 14, 2021
I love riddles!!!???
Answers-
1. ??????
2. Raghu, cuz it was the first day of school, so he couldn’t attend his exam then.
3. Because he was David’s twin.
4. Because pgs 113 and 114 were just side to side of each other. So, there could not be anything between them.
5. I am not sure, but maybe becuz if the stranger had broken in from outside, it would be the opposite
I.e. small pieces would be outside whereas big pieces would be inside.
V.Shyam Ganesh
June 14, 2021
..
Samarth
June 14, 2021
Case 1 – Guy de Maupassant sat inside the Eiffel Tower itself, since it was the only place in Paris where he could not see the Eiffel Tower.
shreyashi
June 14, 2021
1> eiffele tower
2>Raghu- because on first day their is no exam
3>stranger might have pic of his friend
4>because before he died his nephew brought the will
5>because the broken pieces were outside rather than inside so their is no bulglary
Praharshini
June 14, 2021
The answer for the second mystery is that the principal suspects raghu because at 8:00 am there is no exam conducted,so the principal suspects raghu
Vansh
June 14, 2021
1. The writer was facing his back towards the tower so eventually the tower is not visible
2. The suspect is RAGHU because as it is first day of school and he was writing exam paper how is this even possible!!
3.
Dania Sarah Kurian
June 14, 2021
Case 1 Solution – The writer had his lunch in a place located under the Eiffel tower.
Case 2 Solution – The principal suspected Raghu to take Tina’s tuition fee. It was the first day of school. Raghu couldn’t be writing his exam that day.
Case 3 Solution – The stranger was David’s twin brother.
Case 4 Solution – The inspector didn’t believe Rishab. He said he found the paper between pages 113 and 114 but they both sides of the same paper.
Case 5 Solution – If an outsider broke the window of his house to rob it, the glass pieces would have been scattered in the inside of the house. But since the glass pieces were found outside the house, it meant that no outsider could break it. Rather, it could only be broken from the inside. That’s why the policeman was sure that no burglary took place.
Kaavya arun
June 14, 2021
Case 2 raghu…. How can he write the exam paper alone others also should have an exam then
Case 3- when the stranger interfuced himself he would have told his name and profession and davidd must have mentioned that or how would Joseph understand who was he talking about
Case 5- how can a human fit through that small space…
Case 1 and 4 are a bit difficult.
Princy Dhawan
June 14, 2021
Case 1 The writer would be having lunch where his back would be facing the tower so he can’t see the tower or in a a the place which has no window
Case 2 Raghu because at 8am there was assembly going on and no teacher will give exam to write at that time
Case 3 As per me David must be saying about his Twin brother and because he was same no description was required and Joseph easily knew who he was.
Case 4 As pg 113 and 114 are the page numbers which will be one page front side and back side in which noone can put something in it.
Case 5 When someone breaks a window from outside scattered pieces should be inside due to the force but here was completely opposite that’s how policeman find out that couple was lying.
Ranbir Rao
June 14, 2021
Answer to 1st mystery- He sat on top of the Eiffel tower because if the Eiffel tower is the longest monument there , then he will not see the Eiffel tower around him.
Ashtami B R
June 14, 2021
1. In the Eiffel tower
2. Raghu. , Bcz who has exam on the first day of school
4. Maybe , there is no pages between 113 and 114.
Anant prasad
June 14, 2021
Case 2 ans Raghu because it was the first day of school but he said that he was writing the exam paper
SOHAM
June 14, 2021
I could not understand byjus classes
Sarvesh kale
June 14, 2021
The answer of 2nd question is Raghu
How can a school take exam on first day
Prapti Sen
June 14, 2021
Case 1- The writer either went to another country, or had lunch in an underground restaurant, or had lunch in the restaurant of the Eiffel tower so that it was not viewable.
Case 2- It was Raghu as no one writes an examination on the very first day
Case 3- David had given the location and time of going to meet the stranger
Case 4- He told Rishab to put it back as he was trespassing someone else’s property
Case 5- Most probably the wife did the theft as she was inside the house and the crack on the window wasn’t large enough to get a human through
Shreya
June 14, 2021
Case – 1 On top of the tower or underground
Case – 2 As if there would be an exam then everyone must be giving
Case – 3 By his nature
Case – 4 Page 113 and 114 do not face each other in the book Sidney Sheldon
Case – 5 Because there was only few pieces i.e. the whole in the window would be small for a burgler to enter.
Done EUREKA ??✌??
Debarashmi Roy
June 14, 2021
Case 1
He had his lunch on the Eiffel tower itself or at the base of it.
Case 2
Raghu stole the tution fee because why would one write exam paper on the first day of school.
Case 3
The stranger told his name and information to Joseph first when they met.
Case 5
Only a few tiny pieces of window glass was scattered inside the house. So it was broken from inside and no one entered the house from outside.
Vishesh Dey Sarkar
June 14, 2021
Case no.3 answer is he meet David.
suyash mundlik
June 14, 2021
i am very happy in read your case no 5 the robbery
very exiting blog in my life for this mystery ans not robbery in the house
becouse window glass broken inside the house
becouse reson this is robbery so window glass broken in the out side
SiriChandana.G
June 14, 2021
2. Raghu stole the money. Because there would be no exam on the first day of school.
3. David had given the name of the stranger. And the day David met the stranger, he was wearing his name tag.
4. Mr.Bhosle left a will to his children on April20. But according to Rishab, the he found the other will paper a week ago which is April 13, which was just 3 days after his uncle reviewed the will.
5. The burglar would not have fit in the very small hole in the window.
Harjas Kaur
June 14, 2021
case 2
the principal suspected raghu as the one who stole the tuition fee as it was the first day of school and he said that he was writing an exam paper.
case 5
the broken glass was on the floor inside the house rather than outside, this made the policeman sure
Debarashmi Roy
June 14, 2021
Case 1
He took his lunch on the Eiffel tower itself or at the base of it.
Case 2
Raghu stole the tution fee because why would one write exam paper on the first day of school.
Case 3
The stranger told his name and information first.
Case 5
Only a few tiny pieces of window glass was scattered inside the house so it was broken from inside and no one entered the house from outside.
Tiyasa Pathak
June 14, 2021
Case5_ The few tini pieces of glass particles made the policeman so sure because if any outsider entered into the house through the window then many places of Window glass will be scattered .But I think any cat or dog was pass through the window by breaking the window glass stilling any food item.
Tiyasa Pathak
June 14, 2021
I think David told the stranger Joseph address then when the stranger went to Joseph’s house and called Joseph .Then when Joseph met the stranger he understood who he was.
Rena Manish Mathew
June 13, 2021
1. he ate his lunch in the Eiffel tower restaurant
2. There is no exam on the first day of school
3. The stranger was his friend David. They were pen pals and they had arranged the meeting.
4. The pages 113 and 114 are two sides of the same page so it was not possible to find the will between those pages
5. If the burglar broke into the house through the window the glass pieces would mostly be inside the house and not outside
Ishika Gumasta
June 13, 2021
_CASE 1_
Guy de Maussapant ate his lunch under the Eiffel Tower as that would be the only place in the city the tower would not be visible from.
_CASE 2_
Raghu is the one responsible for Tina’s tuition fee going missing as he stated that he was writing the exam paper, but it was only the first day of school . No exams are held on the first day of school.
_CASE 3_
Joseph must have realised who the stranger was by his voice, which he had heard over the phone.
_CASE 4_
_CASE 5_
If the window had been broken by someone on the outside , there would have been a lot more pieces and shards of glass on the inside of the house. And even more if they had actually entered through the window, the burglar might even have gotten injured due to the broken glass.
Ananya G Shetty
June 13, 2021
1.In other country
2.Raghu -because it’s the 1st day of school and how he’ll be writing exam?
3.I think he might be famous or he might be far related to Joseph bit he doesn’t know
4.I think the book was published after April 10th , So Rishabh might be lying
5.Because A person can’t enter house through small spaces also the window was broken for a few tiny pieces. So he might be a cheater
Ananya G Shetty
June 13, 2021
1.In other country
2.Raghu -because it’s the 1st day of school and how he’ll be writing exam?
3.I think he might be famous or he might be far related to Joseph bit he doesn’t know
4.I think the book was published after April 10th , So Rishabh might be lying
5.Because A person can’t enter house through small spaces also the window was broken for a few tiny pieces.
Eklavya nagar
June 13, 2021
1:At the base
2: Raghu and saying that he was writing the exam paper but the other 4 children were not writing the exam paper it will that they were no exam paper
3: because the man was related to David and David was with Joseph
4: got the will 7 days before then why did not gone to Mr Bhosle and as came to Inspector Diwakar that it means that it is a fake will
5: the space was so small the window and a man or any women can’t come from the window it will get there the someone not outsider but a person in the house
manjunadha sri sai yenduri
June 13, 2021
case :1 :- At home because the house has covered with walls so it is not visible
Parvathy Jayan
June 13, 2021
Answers:
1) Eiffel Tower has a restaurant inside. If he had lunch from the restaurant inside the Eiffel Tower, he would not be able to see the Eiffel Tower. Thus, he had his lunch from the restaurant inside the Eiffel Tower.
2) Raghu. It was the first day, so how would he write exam. And he is the only one writing exam, no one else. Thus, Raghu was the suspect.
3) The stranger is his friend, David. Because David didn’t tell the stranger’s appearance but told about him. Thus, it is David.
4) The book of Sidney Sheldon contains one leaf of page which has page 113 and 114 on the back of it. Thus, he was caught with that lie.
5) The broken part of the window was so small that even a small child wouldn’t be able to enter through that area.
Subhrakanta Samanta
June 13, 2021
Case 1
: Guy de Maupassant ate lunch everyday at the base of The Eiffel Tower.
Case 2
: Raghu, he cannot be writing exam papers on the first day of school.
Case 3
: He was a twin brother of one of Joseph’s friends.
Case 4
: Because, it’s not possible to put anything in between page no 113 &114. They are other side of a same page.
Case 5
: When a window is broken from the outside by a thief, most of the glass will be found on the inside of the house, not on the outside of the house.
Rudransh
June 13, 2021
For learning
Rudransh
June 13, 2021
For fun
Dhrithi G Rao
June 13, 2021
I guess these are the answers to the given cases.
Case 1:
He sat under the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2:
The principal suspected Raghu because all the students would write the exam together. How come he was the only one writing the exam? So, this shows that Raghu lied.
Case 3:
I guess it is one of Joseph’s co-worker’s twin.
Case 4:
The inspector said so because Rishab knew that his uncle had revised the will. How did he know that? Why didn’t Rishab bring the will earlier?
Case 5:
Policeman was sure that nobody from outside entered the house because only tiny pieces and few pieces of the glass was inside the house and if someone from outside entered the house, they would have hit the glass harder due to which larger and many pieces of glass would have been inside the house.
Dhrithi G Rao
June 13, 2021
I guess these are the answers to the given cases.
Case 1:
He sat under the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2:
The principal suspected Raghu because all the students would write the exam together. How come he was the only one writing the exam? So, this shows that Raghu lied.
Case 3:
I guess it is one of Joseph’s co-worker’s twin.
Case 4:
The inspector said so because Rishab knew that his uncle had revised the will. How did he know that? Why didn’t Rishab bring the will earlier?
Case 5:
Policeman was sure that nobody from outside entered the house because only tiny pieces and few pieces of the glass was inside the house and if someone from outside entered the house they would have broken the window hard and larger pieces of glass and many pieces of glass would be inside the house.
Shruti Jha
June 13, 2021
Case1- The place is Eiffel tower’s restaurant which is at its base
Case2- Principal suspected Raghu because no exams are conducted on the first day of the school.
Case3- The stranger was was twin brother of David
Case4- The pages 113 and 114 are on the two sides of the same page so nothing can be placed in between it.
Case5- The bigger glass pieces were outside the houses this shows that the window had been broken from inside not outside.
Vidushi Saxena
June 13, 2021
Q1) He sat facing his back to the Eiffle Tower.
Q2) Raghu, as it was the first day if the school. But, he was giving and exam.
Q3) David could have told him that he has won gold medal in art. He be wearing it that day.
Q4) Rishab got the will 10 days ago. But, got to know about it a week ago? This can’t happen. That is why Mr. Diwakar told him to keep it back to it’s respectful place.
Q5) He was sure because some peices of glass indicated that someone had gone from outside. It could be his wife. The person could be the one who complained also. It could be someone who came inside the house.
Dhairya Piyush Chandak
June 13, 2021
Answer 1 – He sat just below the Eiffel tower
Fardeen Ansari
June 13, 2021
1. Basement of his house ?.
2. Ron, because she said she had been chatting with her friends but her all friends were busy in other activities.
3. One thing in common was that both of them knew David.
4. Page no. 113 and 114 can’t be there together.
5. A few tiny pieces of glass particles made the policeman that sure.
HARNOOR
June 12, 2021
case 1- just below the Eiffel Tower.
case 2- Raghu….. because no school sets exam paper on the first day of school
case 4- to see if the nephew really knew where the book Sydney Sheldon was placed
case 5- because only a tiny piece of glass was broken….. burglar couldn’t have entered through the tiny hole in glass
Shaun V Shaji
June 12, 2021
1. Guy de Maupassant used to eat lunch from the restaurant inside the Eiffel Tower that way, He cannot see the Eiffel Tower from the restaurant because it is inside the tower
2. The principal suspected Raghu because there are no exams on the first day of school and he said he was writing one.
3. The stranger was his friend David’s twin brother, who looks exactly like David.
4. There is no space between the pages 113 and 114 because the page numbers are on the same page on each side
5. There were only a few shattered window pieces and it was also small so the hole is also small and a burglar cannot possibly enter through a small hole on the window. That made the policeman so sure that it was not a robbery and no outsider had entered the house.
John V Shaji
June 12, 2021
1. The famous short story writer Guy de Maupassant hated Eiffel tower but, he used to go to the restaurant inside the Eiffel tower so that he could not actually see the Eiffel tower from inside it.
2. The principal suspected Raghu because there are no exams on the first day of school and he said that he was writing the exam.
3. Joseph understood the stranger right away, because it was his friend David’s twin brother who looks exactly like David.
4. Rishabh could not exactly find his uncle’s will between the pages 113 and 114 because, the both page numbers are on the same page on each side. That is how the inspector knew that Rishabh was lying.
5. If a burglar entered through the window then there would be a big hole on window and the size of the shattered pieces would have been larger but, the shattered pieces are small so the hole is also small and a burglar cannot possibly enter through the window through the hole that made the policeman sure that it was not a robbery and no outsider entered their house
Kavya Sharma
June 12, 2021
2. Raghu was lier ,if he was writing exam paper then all students was doing that but only he was off one out reason
Ishita Bajaj
June 11, 2021
Case 1 – The writer ate his lunch everyday on the Eiffel Tower itself as Eiffel Tower is not visible from the Eiffel Tower.
Case 2 – The principal suspected Raghu. Because he can’t write the exam paper on the first day of school.
Case 3 – Because of stranger’s character.
Case 5 – The policeman was so sure that no outsider entered through the broken window because if the window was smashed from outside, the more number of broken window glass pieces will be inside. But in this case, the more pieces are outside that means the window is smashed from inside.
Bhavana S Fattepur
June 11, 2021
Case 1: Inside the Eiffel tower.
Case 2: Raghu, because it is is the first day of school and there are no exams on the first day of school.
Case 3: David’s twin brother.
Case 4: the inspector said this because page number 113 e and 114 on the opposite side of paper. He could have not found the will between these two pages.
Case 5: The broken glass pieces of the window were fallen outside the house not inside. So, this means the window I was broken broken from the inside of the house. So, there could not have been a robbery at their house.
Aradhya
June 11, 2021
Case 1-The writter have his lunch just below the Eiffel tower so he can’t see Eiffel tower
Antony
June 11, 2021
1.Under the eiffel tower
2.Raghu because there is no exam at the first day of school
Shreyash Chauhan
June 11, 2021
So, here are the answers. Almost all were quite simple for one with a detective mind i,e. Me.
In the first case the man would have had his lunch from any place facing his back towards the Eiffel tower. Or simply he could have had it at any place surrounded by walls. Eg. His house
In second case how could Raghu write the exam paper on the first day of school. So he is the culprit. This type of riddle is quite famous or you can say I am used to it
In the third case they may have talked over phone and fixed the meeting and stranger would have told him that he would be wearing a certain dress so Joseph recognised him
In the fourth case I would just like to say that a book simply can’t have its pages in odd-even format. They are always in even-odd format.
In the fifth case as the husband pointed towards broken glass windows at the OUTSIDE of the house. If anyone has to break in through the window he would hit it from outside and the glass pieces would fall in the house. But if the pieces are outside it means someone broke the window from inside to fake the burglary most probably in this case are either the husband or the wife or even both of them.
Case Solved
From Detective Sherlock Holmes.
Rupsa Sengupta
June 11, 2021
1. The poet had lunch in any other city of France.
2. Raghu, because exams cannot be held on th first day of school.
4. As per the writer’s nephew the will was found on 13th April, before the writer’s death. But, the will was produced after 2 days of producing the 1st will. If, the will was found before the death , it was to be the 1st will to be produced on the court.
Nikita Patel
June 11, 2021
Case 1 (answer)
The writer have his lunch from a place where the tower was not visible.
Case 2 (answer)
Principal suspect Ron, Arushi, Raghu, Debby because Tina lost her tuition fee and her parents reported the case to the school principal so that the principal suspected four of her new friends and questioned them that what they doing at 8 am that day.
Lavya
June 11, 2021
1. At the base of Eiffel tower
2. Raghu, he was writing the exam paper on the first day of school
3. Because he was a twin of someone he already knew
4.
5. Because if the thief had broken the window from outside then the glass pieces would have been inside the house
Lavya
June 11, 2021
1. At the base of Eiffel tower
2. Raghu, he was writing the exam paper on the first day of school
3. Because he was a twin of someone he already knew
4.
5. Because if the thief had broken the window outside the house then the glass pieces would have been inside the house
Ragini Agrawal
June 11, 2021
Byjus
Ragini
June 11, 2021
The question are easy
Gaurangi Devidas Jadhav
June 11, 2021
1. The writer was having lunch at the base of Eiffel tower in a restaurant.
2. Raghu because on first day of school there are no exams conducted.
3. Because the stranger was twin brother of his friend.
4. It was the will of Sidney Sheldon the author.
5. Because from the tiny hole no one could enter.
Tiyasa Pathak
June 11, 2021
Case1. I think the writer have his dinner under the Eiffel Tower.
Tiyasa Pathak
June 11, 2021
Case.2_i think the principal suspected Debby because he said that he reached school at 8.30am but principal told them to say what they do at 8am and Debby didnot say what he did at 8am.
Sapna N
June 11, 2021
Answer to case 1 – May be Guy de maupassant had his his lunch in the Eiffel tower itself where he could not see the tower.
Answer to case 2 – The principal suspected Raghu because while everybody else were in the assembly except Debby who came late how can Raghu write the exam paper.
Answer to case 3 – May be the guy was David’s twin.
Answer to case 4 – The inspector said that to check did Rishab really knew where the book was.
Answer to case 5 – The policeman was sure that it was not a burglary because no man could could have entered it through such a small broken area in the window.
Aryan Ashish Baikar
June 11, 2021
Ok
Disha Dinesh Joshi
June 5, 2021
1-1)he won’t call police first.
2)he was talking about what good friend he was but if anyone sees his friend killed then he will only talk
about the what he has & not about their good friendship.
3) might be he killed first then drank him cynacide
4)as mentioned above if anyone is killed by cynacide his muscles go limp
2- Raghu at first day how he was writing exam paper.
3-John
4-1) a date can’t be proof
2) might be he wrote the will for property
3) they first found the will that property should be divided into three parts.
5-small hole with which a man can’t be pass
ARNAV VERMA
June 5, 2021
Case 5 – because if someone would have broken the glass from the outside the glass pieces would be shattered inside and would be mostly inside the house not outside.
ARNAV VERMA
June 5, 2021
Case 3 – John killed because the secret message was like this –
First of January means First letter of January
And it repeats
ARNAV VERMA
June 5, 2021
Case 2- Raghu because that day there was no exam as it was the 1st day .
Garima Singh
June 5, 2021
Case 1:If Kabir and Akash had done lunch together then how can Kabir go to lobby for a newspaper because
the newspaper are send at morning not at after noon.
Case 2:Their is the first day of the school then how can Raghu was writting exam paper.
Case 3:First of January= J
Fourth of October= O
Fifth of March= H
Third of June= N
So, that’s JOHN
Case 4: Rishad could be killed by that killer for property.
Case 5: Because the window has small hole and anyone can’t go through that.
Koninika Pandit
June 5, 2021
Case 3: John was the killer . The note indicated the letter of each month. First January means J. Fourth of October means O. Fifth of March means H. This of June means N.
Pallavi Mishra
June 5, 2021
Ans of case 4 – Rishab was lying because he told that he found the will between page no. 113 & 114 of Sidney Sheldon but in this book those page no. are on the opposite sides of the same page so the will cannot be found in between.
Hence proved he is lying.
Ans of case 5 – The policeman was sure that no one from the outside had came because the crack in the window was very small for any human to come inside.
Hence proved no one has come from outside.
Akul Narain
June 5, 2021
1) The detective thought that this was not a suicide , we know that cyanide kills them instantly but the detective told to arrest Kabir because he have brought the bottle to the room and Kabir also knew that he died 15 minutes ago , this means he only killed aakash.
2) I think Raghu is the suspect because there was no exams in the class so what he was doing? He only stole the money
3) I think Julien killed the widow as the the dates of the months are the starting dates of that month , I think the widow dint gave the housemaid the money in these months
4) The inspector said because , it was may be a bad will or the will was written by Rishabh only
5) Because if any outsider would have broken the window then the pieces inside the house and not outside the house
Disha Prakash
June 5, 2021
In the Case 2 Raghu stole Tina tution fee as no one will write exam on the first day of the school
Sapna N
June 5, 2021
Answer to case 1- The detective suspected Kabir because how did Kabir who went to the lobby for a newspaper half an hour ago know that Akash Gupta have been dead for about 15 minutes.
Answer to case 2- The principal suspected Raghu because while everybody who were suspected were all in the assembly at the same time except for Debby who came late how is it possible for Raghu to write the exam paper?
Answer to case 3- Detective Roy instantly knew who was the murderer because the note has a riddle which answers the name JOHN.
Answer to case 4- The inspector said that because to find out that did Rishab actually found the will between that Book or is it a fake will.
Answer to case 5- The policeman was sure because the burglar could not have been possibly enter the house with such a small break in the window.
Sanjana Arun
June 5, 2021
1.Because in description given at the beginning that the bottle of cyanide was found “clutched” in his hand.But if drink cyanide the body goes into limp,so it is not possible for the bottle to be clutched in his hand.
2.Raghu, Because it was the first day of school so he could not have been writing his exam paper.
3.John because it says First of January meaning first letter of January,Fourth of October meaning fourth letter of October and if you take the 5th and 3rd letters of March and June respectively you will get the name John.
4.Because the 113th and the 114 pages of any book will be on the same page of the book hence Rishab could not have found the will between 113th and 114th pages of the book.
5.Because if the burglar had come from outside then there would have been more prices of glass inside than outside.
Ammachar.S
June 5, 2021
1.I think it is becoz Kabir said that he went down half an hour ago….then how could he confidently say that Akash died 15 min ago…
2 I think so Raghu
3.John
5.Becoz if someone broked the window there must be more pieces of window…but I think the husband and his wife only broked the window …so only tiny pieces
Yashraj Malvi
June 5, 2021
Case 2 – Raghu is guilty because in first day of School
how he writes exam paper ??
Antony
June 5, 2021
Case 2:Raghu because there is no exam at the first day of school
Case 3:John because the first letter of January is j,fourth letter of October is o,fifth letter of March is hand the third letter of June is n